Re: IDE with VIA VT6421A on netra T1 ultrasparc II

2012-01-25 Thread Tom Theisen
I forgot to specify more info, sorry. I will happily give you more info should you need it. Thanks again. - Muling The system runs debian squeeze, up to date. root@netra:~# uname -a Linux netra 2.6.32-5-sparc64 #1 Wed Jan 11 12:17:58 UTC 2012 sparc64 GNU/Linux root@netra:~# lspci -vv 0

IDE with VIA VT6421A on netra T1 ultrasparc II

2012-01-25 Thread Tom Theisen
Hey everybody, I bought a cheap PCI IDE/SATA/USB controller to expand the capabilities of my SUN netra T1 AC200 machine. The card uses a VIA VT6421A chipset for IDE and SATA, and a VIA VT6421T for USB. The USB part works fine, i couldn't test SATA due to lack of a SATA drive but the IDE par

Re: Ultrasparc II

2011-07-12 Thread brian m. carlson
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:50:41PM +0200, Csepregi Zoltan wrote: > Hi all, > > I would have a question. I have got some Sun - Ultra Sparc 10 computer with TI > UltraSparc IIi cpu. And i tried to distupgrade my old stable debian to > squueze. > Is there a support yet for this sparc architecture in

Re: Ultrasparc II

2011-07-12 Thread Hartwig Atrops
Hi. > I would have a question. I have got some Sun - Ultra Sparc 10 computer with > TI UltraSparc IIi cpu. And i tried to distupgrade my old stable debian to > squueze. Is there a support yet for this sparc architecture in squueze? Or > which debian release supported it? Debian Squeeze works well

Ultrasparc II

2011-07-12 Thread Csepregi Zoltan
Hi all, I would have a question. I have got some Sun - Ultra Sparc 10 computer with TI UltraSparc IIi cpu. And i tried to distupgrade my old stable debian to squueze. Is there a support yet for this sparc architecture in squueze? Or which debian release supported it? Best Regards, vip -- To

Re: Enterprise 450 UltraSparc II

2004-05-20 Thread Mike Artis
f you're concerned, perhaps changing the slots the controllers use would > help. > > > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 04:41:54PM -0400, Mike Artis said: > > Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 16:41:54 -0400 > > From: Mike Artis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: debian-sparc@li

Re: Enterprise 450 UltraSparc II

2004-05-20 Thread Mike Edwards
OTECTED]> > To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org > Subject: Enterprise 450 UltraSparc II > X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5.7 > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=2.60 > X-Spam-Level: > > I am trying to install Debian 3.0 r2 on an Enterpris

Re: Enterprise 450 UltraSparc II

2004-05-20 Thread Mike Artis
Yes, all of the SCSI controllers have the same chipset (Symbios Logic 53c875). The system works fine with the disks in the wrong order, but it will cause a major headache to figure out which disk in the chassis corresponds to which sd* device in Linux. Also, setting up the software RAID on this

Re: Enterprise 450 UltraSparc II

2004-05-19 Thread Patrick Finnegan
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 15:41, Mike Artis wrote: > My problem is that during and after installation, Debian reports the > drive order incorrectly. It is reporting disk #4 (the first slot on > the first controller card) as /dev/sda instead of disk #0 as > /dev/sda. This setup worked correctly in

Enterprise 450 UltraSparc II

2004-05-19 Thread Mike Artis
I am trying to install Debian 3.0 r2 on an Enterprise 450 UltraSparc II. My server has a total of 12 hard drives installed. Here is the layout of the disks. These numbers reflect what the system should see them as after installation. Onboard SCSI controller (holds 4 drives

ultrasparc II/e

2001-11-05 Thread Narancs v1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! is there anybody to know that if Linux supports this hardware? like Sun Netra T1 200 (not 105 which has II/i CPU that is currently supported) my debian linux install cd set doesn't boot this hw. (2.2.19) Is it supported in 2.4.13 or later? i