Michael,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:51:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Since no-one in the systemd/udev team is using SPARC hardware, I was
wondering, if vio_type would have a better home in e.g. the sparc-utils
[2] package, where it would be maintained and tested by people with
knowledge
Am 13.05.2013 13:45, schrieb Julien Cristau:
Michael,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:51:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Since no-one in the systemd/udev team is using SPARC hardware, I was
wondering, if vio_type would have a better home in e.g. the sparc-utils
[2] package, where it would be
On May 13, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
I don't think that would make much sense, and this belongs with the
related utils in udev IMO.
Actually the root issue is that the helper is (was?) needed only because
the kernel does not provide the data needed to allow autoloading these
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 16:26:05 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 13, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
I don't think that would make much sense, and this belongs with the
related utils in udev IMO.
Actually the root issue is that the helper is (was?) needed only because
the
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 04:17:40PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 13.05.2013 13:45, schrieb Julien Cristau:
Michael,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:51:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Since no-one in the systemd/udev team is using SPARC hardware, I was
wondering, if vio_type would have a
Hi SPARC porters, hi Jurij!
Since my last attempt to contact Jurij wasn't successful and I'm
actually not sure, if Jurij is still active (as a SPARC porter), I'm
reposting the full email, hoping to gather some feedback from the Debian
SPARC porters.
Regards,
Michael
Am 29.03.2013 22:16,
6 matches
Mail list logo
