-Original Message-
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 July 2004 21:51
To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: What is best kernel/disto combination for SS20 SMP?
This is one of the rare events where userspace isn't the
problem. 2.6.x needs somebody
-Original Message-
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2004 12:29
To: Gary Parker
Subject: Re: What is best kernel/disto combination for SS20 SMP?
Just a thought, but do people think it would be worthwhile getting
some note about the instability
On Monday 05 Jul 2004 16:12, Gary Parker wrote:
Hi all, I've been successfully running a stock Woody install on an SS5
70MHz/128MB for a year or so now as my home firewall/router/mail server but
felt I'd outgrown it's limited processing power (wanting to do more with
it) and recently treated
: What is best kernel/disto combination for SS20 SMP?
Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:14:55 -0500 (CDT)
Resent-From: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
On Monday 05 Jul 2004 16:12, Gary Parker wrote:
Hi all, I've been successfully running a stock Woody install on an SS5
70MHz/128MB for a year
-Original Message-
From: David Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 July 2004 17:15
To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: What is best kernel/disto combination for SS20 SMP?
As far as I'm aware, no kernel is stable with even a single
150MHz Ross CPU, let alone
On Mon, 2004-07-05 12:15:27 -0400, JLB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why wouldn't they? Don't all CPUs labeled as SPARC have to meet the
SPARC specifications?
It's not all *that* easy. There are optional parts which some CPU
implement, others don't. IIRC there's an
- Original Message -
From: David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: What is best kernel/disto combination for SS20 SMP?
It shouldn't make any difference which distro you choose, it's the kernel
which
7 matches
Mail list logo
