Re: XFree86 Problems

1999-08-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, the problem (rather obscure) is that he has a special add-on 24 bit card which is /dev/fb0 and XF86_Mach64 only looks at /dev/fb0. Really? Isn't this a bug in the xserver-mach64? I don't see a bug filed, however... -- .Adam Di [EMAIL

Re: XFree86 Problems

1999-08-21 Thread Steve Dunham
Michael Jean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ok, heres two discrepencies i noted; i've never used X with an ultra, but.. Operating System: Linux 2.2.9 sparc64 [ELF] Configured drivers: Mach64: accelerated server for ATI Mach64 graphics adaptors (Patchlevel 0) (using VT number 7) Linux

Re: XFree86 Problems

1999-08-19 Thread Michael Jean
ok, heres two discrepencies i noted; i've never used X with an ultra, but.. Operating System: Linux 2.2.9 sparc64 [ELF] Configured drivers: Mach64: accelerated server for ATI Mach64 graphics adaptors (Patchlevel 0) (using VT number 7) Linux 2.2.9/64 Now, from your dmesg Linux version 2.2.1

XFree86 Problems

1999-08-18 Thread Adam D . McKenna
I'm having some problems with XFree86.. At the suggestion of a friend, I symlinked /dev/fb to /dev/fb0, but I still can't start X.. Here's what I get when I try to startx: (BTW, gpm isn't working either, see dmesg output at bottom. What should I be using as my mouse device?) XFree86 Version