Re: ash need to be recompiled

On Fri, Nov 27, 1998 at 11:47:38PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: > Christian Meder wrote: > > Very cool. Would it be possible to create a 2.0.35 installation set > > and a 2.1.130 set (next week) ? best of both worlds approach I guess > > ;-) > > I will try to upload new boot disks next monday, base

Re: ash need to be recompiled

Christian Meder wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 1998 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm requiring new ash package to release bootdisks (0.3.4-2 in sid > > complains about different size for sys_siglist). > > Is someone working on it or should I do it myself ? > > I'

Re: ash need to be recompiled

Joel Klecker wrote: > BTW, I figured out how to get "library reduction" working with glibc 2.1, > it's not a binutils problem at all, it is simply necessary to have the > symbol versioning map to give to the linker (which is not part of the > libc6-pic package at present, though my current tree

Re: ash need to be recompiled

At 01:17 +0100 1998-11-27, Christian Meder wrote: On Thu, Nov 26, 1998 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: Hello, I'm requiring new ash package to release bootdisks (0.3.4-2 in sid complains about different size for sys_siglist). Is someone working on it or should I do it myself ? I

Re: ash need to be recompiled

On Thu, Nov 26, 1998 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm requiring new ash package to release bootdisks (0.3.4-2 in sid > complains about different size for sys_siglist). > Is someone working on it or should I do it myself ? I'll do it tomorrow. Anything else you need

ash need to be recompiled

Hello, I'm requiring new ash package to release bootdisks (0.3.4-2 in sid complains about different size for sys_siglist). Is someone working on it or should I do it myself ? Thanks in advance. PS: I did a fresh install on a sparc-classic last night with minor troubles. I'm fixing them rig