Eric Delaunay writes:
> Since the compiled program does not work like expected, it could be a
> compilation problem. Could be because sparc macro is not define anymore ?
Surely a change in what gets defined could explain such things. What
should be tested for instead ?
This does not seem to h
Paul Vojta wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 15:18:11 +0100 (CET)
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian bug tracking system),
> > debian-sparc@lists.debian.org (debian sparc group)
> > From: Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: bad mke2fs beha
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 15:18:11 +0100 (CET)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian bug tracking system),
> debian-sparc@lists.debian.org (debian sparc group)
> From: Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: bad mke2fs behavior on sparc
>
> Latest mke2fs zer
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.17-1
Architecture: sparc
Severity: critical
Latest mke2fs zeroes the first sector of the partition is is formating.
It is really bad on sparc when the partition starts at sector 0 because it
kills the partition table :((
I took a quick look into e2fsprogs sources: it
4 matches
Mail list logo
