On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:26:30AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 01:11, Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
> > If everyone is experiencing issues with those kernel releases, maybe
> > it's better to remove them from unstable.
>
> That is not really an option. The 2.6.18 kernel is sch
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 01:11, Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
> If everyone is experiencing issues with those kernel releases, maybe
> it's better to remove them from unstable.
That is not really an option. The 2.6.18 kernel is scheduled for release
with Etch.
What needs to happen is that the bug i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 9, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 08/ott/06, alle ore 22:42, Riccardo Tortorici ha scritto:
The latest kernel version in unstable is 2.6.18. You do know that
the kernel
pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 08/ott/06, alle ore 22:42, Riccardo Tortorici ha scritto:
The latest kernel version in unstable is 2.6.18. You do know that
the kernel
packages got renamed from kernel-image to linux-image at some
point, right? :-).
Yeah, I was convin
On 09/10/2006, at 6:42 AM, Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
Now I've upgraded from 2.6.8 to 2.6.18 but I get this error if I
boot with the new image:
NVRAM: Low battery voltage!
CLOCK: Clock was stopped. Kick start
Boot with 2.6.8 is ok.
As far as I can see, this message is in time.c from kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 7, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:15:41AM +0200, Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
I have a Sunblade 150 (sparc64) with 2.6.8 running.
I've just downloaded the netboot image from here[1].
By the way... No one know
On Sunday 08 October 2006 10:33, Hamish Greig wrote:
> This is all the things I would be looking at in your situation,
plus check silo.conf isn't using obsolete devfs names for your hardware.
hamish
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Sunday 08 October 2006 01:09, Enrique Morfin wrote:
> It complains about the hdd device.
>
> something about diferences of /dev/hda and
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5
what is in your /etc/fstab ?
devfs style naming ?
Where does the boot halt? right where the root filesystem should b
> > Hi!
> >
> > Does anyone have a blade 150 with kernel 2.6
> running?
> >
> > If so, how?
> >
> > I can't boot on 2.6 kernels, just 2.4 (currently
> using
> > 2.4.26-sparc64) :(
> >
> > I'm using etch.
>
> What version of the installer and what installation
> method you are using, and what
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:15:41AM +0200, Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
> I have a Sunblade 150 (sparc64) with 2.6.8 running.
> I've just downloaded the netboot image from here[1].
> By the way... No one knows when newer kernel version will be
> available in unstable?
> Ric
The latest kernel versio
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:30:48PM -0700, Enrique Morfin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does anyone have a blade 150 with kernel 2.6 running?
>
> If so, how?
>
> I can't boot on 2.6 kernels, just 2.4 (currently using
> 2.4.26-sparc64) :(
>
> I'm using etch.
What version of the installer and what installati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 6, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Enrique Morfin wrote:
Hi!
Does anyone have a blade 150 with kernel 2.6 running?
If so, how?
I can't boot on 2.6 kernels, just 2.4 (currently using
2.4.26-sparc64) :(
I have a Sunblade 150 (sparc64) with 2.6.8 run
Hi!
Does anyone have a blade 150 with kernel 2.6 running?
If so, how?
I can't boot on 2.6 kernels, just 2.4 (currently using
2.4.26-sparc64) :(
I'm using etch.
Bye.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection arou
13 matches
Mail list logo
