David Miller wrote:
From: Josip Rodin
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:49:11 +0100
I'm just Cc:'ing this to the sparc kernel mailing list...
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:21:56PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback as to whether anyone is actually using
the dmfe Davico
David Miller wrote:
From: Brian Thompson
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:25:48 -0400
David Miller wrote:
From: Josip Rodin
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:49:11 +0100
I'm just Cc:'ing this to the sparc kernel mailing list...
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:21:56PM -0500, Brian Thompson
From: Brian Thompson
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:25:48 -0400
>
>
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Josip Rodin
> > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:49:11 +0100
> >
> >
> >> I'm just Cc:'ing this to the sparc kernel mailing list...
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:21:56PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrot
From: Josip Rodin
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:49:11 +0100
>
> I'm just Cc:'ing this to the sparc kernel mailing list...
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:21:56PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> > I'd like to get some feedback as to whether anyone is actually using
> > the dmfe Davicom kernel module o
brian m. carlson wrote:
> Or it could be documented in the release notes that users of
> those machines will need to blacklist dmfe manually.
It already is documented in the installation guide.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:28:59PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
In my opinion that would also be a satisfactory solution. I believe it
would complicate things though for those who need to use the dmfe
module along with that particular PCI ID (possibly DEC alpha users?).
It would be better if we c
Brian Thompson wrote:
> Maybe the solution is somewhere in the middle... Seems the ideal
> situation would be for the dmfe kernel module to be built and installed
> on sparc by default but not enabled/mapped. That way someone
> who does want to use it would only have to make some minor text
> file
brian m. carlson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:21:56PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback as to whether anyone is actually using
the dmfe Davicom kernel module on sparc for 10/100 ethernet.
I do not at the immediate moment, but I have in the past. As the
onboard N
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:21:56PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback as to whether anyone is actually using
the dmfe Davicom kernel module on sparc for 10/100 ethernet.
I do not at the immediate moment, but I have in the past. As the
onboard NIC on my Ultra 5 has a poo
I'm just Cc:'ing this to the sparc kernel mailing list...
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:21:56PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to get some feedback as to whether anyone is actually using
> the dmfe Davicom kernel module on sparc for 10/100 ethernet.
>
> To the best of my kno
Hello,
I'd like to get some feedback as to whether anyone is actually using
the dmfe Davicom kernel module on sparc for 10/100 ethernet.
To the best of my knowledge, Sun never manufactured any
expansion cards that utilize the Davicom chip and the UltraAX-i2
motherboard (Netra X1 and Sunfire V10
11 matches
Mail list logo
