Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 13 May 1999, Steve Dunham wrote:
Yeah, glibc should work fine on sparc32 machines with a recent kernel,
there is a patched 2.2.7 kernel and a 2.2.8 kernel at:
http://www.cse.msu.edu/debian/kernel
Herbert, I see that you are the
On 13 May 1999, Steve Dunham wrote:
Yeah, glibc should work fine on sparc32 machines with a recent kernel,
there is a patched 2.2.7 kernel and a 2.2.8 kernel at:
http://www.cse.msu.edu/debian/kernel
Steve,
It works!! It was nice to see the machine boot normally again ;-)
Ben, could you
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 02:07:20PM +0530, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
On 13 May 1999, Steve Dunham wrote:
Yeah, glibc should work fine on sparc32 machines with a recent kernel,
there is a patched 2.2.7 kernel and a 2.2.8 kernel at:
http://www.cse.msu.edu/debian/kernel
Steve,
It works!!
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 02:07:20PM +0530, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
On 13 May 1999, Steve Dunham wrote:
Yeah, glibc should work fine on sparc32 machines with a recent kernel,
there is a patched 2.2.7 kernel and a 2.2.8 kernel at:
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 09:46:16AM -0400, J. S. Connell wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
All the new packages will run with slink's glibc, they are perfectly
compatible. Please report any problems to the contrary as we are set on
having this compatability.
The following
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 06:57:16AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 09:46:16AM -0400, J. S. Connell wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
All the new packages will run with slink's glibc, they are perfectly
compatible. Please report any problems to the contrary
Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 12/05, Ben Collins wrote:
| All the new packages will run with slink's glibc, they are perfectly
| compatible. Please report any problems to the contrary as we are set on
| having this compatability.
Btw, I am running glibc2.1.1-2 on my Sparc10
Hi Debian users,
I tried to upgrade my Sun Sparc 5 to potato and this error occurs:
What I can do?
Have a nice day,Paulo Henrique
Preparing to replace libc6 2.0.105-2 (using .../libc6_2.1.1-5_sparc.deb)
...
WARNING: Your sun4m cpu is known to have problems with
the current
You lucky chap, you have just been saved from a lot of trouble ;-)
Do not try to install glibc2.1 on a sun4m. Search the archives for recent
posts by Ben Collins and me on the libc6 problem.
Till you get a go-ahead on this list, hold libc6 at 2.0.x level
Regards,
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Paulo
Hi,
thanks for the advice. But I think that news packages are beign compiled
with glibc2.1. Am I wrong? I want enlightenment in my Sun! :)
Have a nice day , Paulo Henrique
Quoting Sanjeev Gupta ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
You lucky chap, you have just been saved
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the advice. But I think that news packages are beign compiled
with glibc2.1. Am I wrong? I want enlightenment in my Sun! :)
Have a nice day , Paulo Henrique
No idea. Perhaps Mitch
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 05:38:52AM -0300, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the advice. But I think that news packages are beign compiled
with glibc2.1. Am I wrong? I want enlightenment in my Sun! :)
Have a nice day , Paulo Henrique
All
On 12/05, Ben Collins wrote:
| All the new packages will run with slink's glibc, they are perfectly
| compatible. Please report any problems to the contrary as we are set on
| having this compatability.
Btw, I am running glibc2.1.1-2 on my Sparc10 (Sun4m) without any apparent
problem (as long as
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
All the new packages will run with slink's glibc, they are perfectly
compatible. Please report any problems to the contrary as we are set on
having this compatability.
The following errors occur with libc6 2.0.105-2:
zsh from
14 matches
Mail list logo
