> Juan Cespedes writes:
Juan> On Thu, Mar 12, 1998 at 09:09:24AM +0100, Davide Barbieri wrote:
Juan> Hmm... I suffer the same thing, but I hadn't noticed it
Juan> because I always use ssh instead of logging directly...
Juan> Maybe we'll need to recompile login...
Definitly. setutxent ha
On Thu, Mar 12, 1998 at 09:09:24AM +0100, Davide Barbieri wrote:
> Juan Cespedes wrote:
> > > Eric Delaunay wrote:
> > > > - silo big troubles with libc6 :-((
> > > [...]
> > > > - binutils 2.8.1.0.21 is out (maybe solve the silo problems ???)
> > >
> > > should I try the n
Juan Cespedes wrote:
> > Eric Delaunay wrote:
> > > - silo big troubles with libc6 :-((
> > [...]
> > > - binutils 2.8.1.0.21 is out (maybe solve the silo problems ???)
> >
> > should I try the new binutils? Juan, are you going to
> > package them soon?
>
> Uploade
> Anders Hammarquist writes:
> - glibca new release is available for testing
I don't know if it's a problem with initgroups() or
getgroups(), but I get "cespedes root" when using `groups' (it should
be just "cespedes"). Does anyone else suffer this?
>>
>>> Sa
- glibca new release is available for testing
>>>
>>> I don't know if it's a problem with initgroups() or
>>> getgroups(), but I get "cespedes root" when using `groups' (it should
>>> be just "cespedes"). Does anyone else suffer this?
>
>> Same here. It appears to be at least affectin
> Anders Hammarquist writes:
>>> - glibca new release is available for testing
>>
>> I don't know if it's a problem with initgroups() or
>> getgroups(), but I get "cespedes root" when using `groups' (it should
>> be just "cespedes"). Does anyone else suffer this?
> Same here. It ap
>> - glibca new release is available for testing
>
>I don't know if it's a problem with initgroups() or
>getgroups(), but I get "cespedes root" when using `groups' (it should
>be just "cespedes"). Does anyone else suffer this?
Same here. It appears to be at least affecting initgroups, s
On Tue, Mar 10, 1998 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote:
>
> - glibca new release is available for testing
I don't know if it's a problem with initgroups() or
getgroups(), but I get "cespedes root" when using `groups' (it should
be just "cespedes"). Does anyone else suffe
On Wed, Mar 11, 1998 at 09:18:00AM +0100, Davide Barbieri wrote:
> Eric Delaunay wrote:
> > - silo big troubles with libc6 :-((
> [...]
> > - binutils 2.8.1.0.21 is out (maybe solve the silo problems ???)
>
> should I try the new binutils? Juan, are you going to
> package them so
On Tue, Mar 10, 1998 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> hamm will be frozen in few days, but what should be made about the sparc
> port? Are we ready for a release?
> I did a quick check on the Packages file:
> 616 packages were compiled for sparc (don't know how many a
Eric Delaunay wrote:
> - silo big troubles with libc6 :-((
[...]
> - binutils 2.8.1.0.21 is out (maybe solve the silo problems ???)
should I try the new binutils? Juan, are you going to
package them soon? Have I to compile them on my own?
The problem with compiling, is that I'm s
>hamm will be frozen in few days, but what should be made about the sparc
>port? Are we ready for a release?
As it looks right now, probably not. Though the new glibc looks really
promising (I just compiled perl against it, and it no longer needs
LD_BIND_NOW. Unfortunately it fails a few math tes
Hello,
hamm will be frozen in few days, but what should be made about the sparc
port? Are we ready for a release?
I did a quick check on the Packages file:
616 packages were compiled for sparc (don't know how many are up-to-date)
296 packages are arch indep.
(about 1500 packages are in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
