On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 23:19, Brian C. Miles wrote:
What is this leo hardware you speak of?
leo = ZX or TurboZX framebuffer.
I've thought of installing Solaris, just to see if their X implementation
has some sort of acceleration for this hardware (i.e. to see if it's even
possible to get
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 13:59, Andrew Burd wrote:
from what I understand all this old sparc hardware goes very cheap
everywhere.. I think it's cool old stuff.. and it certainly works for what
I'm using it for.. I decided to stick with the debian packages, installed
2.4.18 today and I'm doing NAT
I've got a leo fb that I want to use. Does anyone know of particular issues
using a leo with the SS10? X reports that screen(s) were found but no
usable configurations.
also I tried all bit depths and the driver didn't seem to support them. Is
this an X driver issue or an issue with the
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 19:29, synapse wrote:
I've got a leo fb that I want to use. Does anyone know of particular issues
using a leo with the SS10? X reports that screen(s) were found but no
usable configurations.
also I tried all bit depths and the driver didn't seem to support them. Is
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 19:29, synapse wrote:
I've got a leo fb that I want to use. Does anyone know of particular issues
using a leo with the SS10? X reports that screen(s) were found but no
usable configurations.
also I tried all bit depths and the driver didn't seem to support them. Is
--On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:37 PM -0400 Steve Pacenka
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I literally just swapped a leo back into my SS10 two days ago. It
worked fine with console and X earlier with Woody and now with Sarge
(XFree86 4.2 I believe).
XF86Config-4 settings = 32 bits per pixel,
6 matches
Mail list logo
