Currently I have an opinion on libc5 in sparc. 1) our current libc5 is
pretty broken (I can't seem to get too many libc5 binaries to work with
it), it makes xfree86-1 build fail when doing the libc5 compat xlib, 2)
the latest libc5 wont compile for sparc (the build doesn't even support
a sparc
Ben == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben I want to get a consensus on dropping libc5 support in our
Ben sparc dist, it will relieve a lot of overhead and save us
Ben some headache for the potato release.
I'm in favour of dropping libc5.
--
Stephen
---
Long noun chains don't
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently I have an opinion on libc5 in sparc. 1) our current libc5 is
pretty broken (I can't seem to get too many libc5 binaries to work with
it), it makes xfree86-1 build fail when doing the libc5 compat xlib, 2)
the latest libc5 wont compile for sparc
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 02:10:28PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently I have an opinion on libc5 in sparc. 1) our current libc5 is
pretty broken (I can't seem to get too many libc5 binaries to work with
it), it makes xfree86-1 build fail when doing
4 matches
Mail list logo