libc5...pro or con...

1999-05-17 Thread Ben Collins
Currently I have an opinion on libc5 in sparc. 1) our current libc5 is pretty broken (I can't seem to get too many libc5 binaries to work with it), it makes xfree86-1 build fail when doing the libc5 compat xlib, 2) the latest libc5 wont compile for sparc (the build doesn't even support a sparc

Re: libc5...pro or con...

1999-05-17 Thread Stephen Zander
Ben == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ben I want to get a consensus on dropping libc5 support in our Ben sparc dist, it will relieve a lot of overhead and save us Ben some headache for the potato release. I'm in favour of dropping libc5. -- Stephen --- Long noun chains don't

Re: libc5...pro or con...

1999-05-17 Thread Steve Dunham
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Currently I have an opinion on libc5 in sparc. 1) our current libc5 is pretty broken (I can't seem to get too many libc5 binaries to work with it), it makes xfree86-1 build fail when doing the libc5 compat xlib, 2) the latest libc5 wont compile for sparc

Re: libc5...pro or con...

1999-05-17 Thread Collins M. Ben
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 02:10:28PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Currently I have an opinion on libc5 in sparc. 1) our current libc5 is pretty broken (I can't seem to get too many libc5 binaries to work with it), it makes xfree86-1 build fail when doing