Re: libreadline & bash

1997-01-31 Thread Eric Delaunay
> I would suggest that when you port code to the SPARC you check Red Hat > Source RPMS for the patchs the SparcLinux team did for the port to > avoid creating incompatible versions of the programs. Thanks for the idea. I have checked RedHat sources and discovered one difference between patches:

Re: libreadline & bash

1997-01-30 Thread Miguel de Icaza
> I don't know what change you have made to bash sources. Mine is just on one > header file (machines.h): I've copied declarations from Linux/m68k then > customized labels to be sparc. Apparently it works just fine for me. I would suggest that when you port code to the SPARC you check Red Hat S

Re: libreadline & bash

1997-01-30 Thread Davide Barbieri
Eric Delaunay wrote: [some problems with my bash.deb for sparc] yes, it's true; the bash debian packages I have built is wrong. I hope you were better than me! :-) We must start to upload packages on master.debian.org. But the connection is too slow for me... > I don't know what change you have

libreadline & bash

1997-01-30 Thread Eric Delaunay
The libreadline package I've compiled is out of date. It fails w/ bash 1.14.7-2 from Davide Barbieri :-( Just forget it. However, I didn't find libreadline 2.0.1 on your ftp site, Davide. Moreover, pre-depends field from your bash package isn't correctly set to check this conflict. So I've rebui