On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:35:36AM +0200, christian mock wrote:
> Did the stability of SMP sun4m boxen improve for anyone going from
> 2.4.18 to 2.4.19? Shall I invest the multiple CPU hours to recompile
> for SMP?
Well, I tried 2.4.20-pre11 from osinvestor.com, and here it sits,
going
spin_lock
* christian mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021023 02:41]:
> Did the stability of SMP sun4m boxen improve for anyone going from
> 2.4.18 to 2.4.19? Shall I invest the multiple CPU hours to recompile
> for SMP?
Absolutely... there were a _ton_ of fixes that went into the 2.4.19-pre
series for 2.4.x ...
My opinion is that Ben knows a lot more about this stuff than I do, plus he's
the one that would end up having to support it. I personally think of 2.4
on sparc32 as experimental. sun4d is completely broken, sun4c breaks at
whim, and sun4m has a bunch of smaller problems. The only reason I put u
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:05:22AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 21:52:17 -0400,
> > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've no
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 21:52:17 -0400,
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've noted that
> > already :)
>
> actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well o
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:35:36AM +0200, christian mock wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
>
> > actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well on my SS20 (even in SMP mode)
> > and LX. i'm running the dual-SS20 as my two-headed desktop, and it works
>
>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
> actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well on my SS20 (even in SMP mode)
> and LX. i'm running the dual-SS20 as my two-headed desktop, and it works
IBTD; I've compiled 2.4.19 as non-SMP to finally get my 2 CPU SS10
stable; i
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 21:52:17 -0400,
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've noted that
> > already :)
>
> actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well o
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 21:52:17 -0400,
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've noted that
> already :)
actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well on my SS20 (even in SMP mode)
and LX. i'm running the dual-SS20 as my two-headed desktop
9 matches
Mail list logo
