On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 04:01:15PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > It does seem to have issues -- kernel 2.6.19.2 had crashed at one point
> > soon after the buildd started running, and I seem to see some three more
> > 'down' entries now with 2.6.22-rc5... elmo might know more.
>
> Perhaps you coul
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:53:37PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Right now I see some 42 *_sparc.deb files in there, so it seems like it
> might be approaching a working state of some sort. It does seem to have
> issues -- kernel 2.6.19.2 had crashed at one point soon after the buildd
> started runni
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 02:57:15PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I finally plugged in that Fire 280R last night! :) It took some time, but
> > it's there.
>
> The machine currently has 2 GB RAM memory and two 750 MHz processors.
>
> Now it's better in that regard than both auric and spontini, whi
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 06:28:59AM -0800, Earl Violet wrote:
> I sometimes come across Sun components while salvaging computers. If
> I know what is needed/wanted, I will put things aside. I am in
> Tucson, Arizona, USA. There are many components I am not familiar
> with but I will try.
That will
I sometimes come across Sun components while salvaging computers. If
I know what is needed/wanted, I will put things aside. I am in
Tucson, Arizona, USA. There are many components I am not familiar
with but I will try.
Earl
URL http://deserthowler.cjb.net
Instant messenger: earlcoyote
ICQ:640334
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:20:16AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Yesterday I decommissioned that 280R and it's now waiting in a storage
> > room. I'll find some extra disks and plug them in, as well as a
> > permanent place in a network rack.
>
> I finally plugged in that Fire 280R last night! :)
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:45:28PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > sparc will be removed from consideration until we no longer have to
> > > worry about OpenOffice builds (or other intensive package builds)
> > > crashing the buildd machines.
> >
> > I have a few Ultra5 machines available, as well
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:45:28PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I don't know what kind of memory [280R] machines use, and judging by the
> price of extra CPUs I doubt I'll be able to afford buying more
The Sun handbook says they are 232-pin 7ns memory modules.
$400 for a gigabyte at http://www.memo
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 02:18:43PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > sparc will be removed from consideration until we no longer have to
> > worry about OpenOffice builds (or other intensive package builds)
> > crashing the buildd machines.
>
> I have a few Ultra5 machines available, as well as suffic
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 03:48:51PM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> >The Xorg setup that works flawlessly on my blade 100 with (custom)
> >2.6.9 at 1280
> >x 960 at 85 Hz suddenly only works at 60 Hz and shows red dots with
> >debian
> >2.6.14. I haven't investigated much in this issue, but perh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 28/dic/05, alle ore 15:29, Admar Schoonen ha scritto:
Are you running the Debian 2.6.14 kernel, or another (self
compiled?) version?
A self compiled version based on the latest debian sources (2.6.14-6).
And what about Xorg? Do you ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 27/dic/05, alle ore 19:04, William Herrin ha scritto:
On a Sparc netra X1, the system partially freezes (some stuff
continues running but at least one of the operations necessary to
log in gets stuck). The logs show that as of the momen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>On a Sparc netra X1, the system partially freezes (some stuff continues
>running but at least one of the operations necessary to log in gets stuck).
>The logs show that as of the moment of the freeze, the clock has jumped
>forward exactly
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Can i also repoduce this on a sarge machine / what are the requirements
>to get this happen. only the kernel or more?
>is a chroot with sid/etch inside enough?
>What can i do to help the porters with this issue.?
>
>I know that rene is doin
I hadn't seen that, thanks. That sunsolve issue is kind of light on the
details, but it implies a random drift of a few seconds. The symptoms I
see are a sudden forward jump of exactly 3d 6:11:15. Every time it happened I saw exactly the same jump, after which some
programs continue running while o
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:04:50 EST, William Herrin writes:
>On a Sparc netra X1, the system partially freezes (some stuff continues
>running but at least one of the operations necessary to log in gets stuck).
>The logs show that as of the moment of the freeze, the clock has jumped
>forward exactly 3
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 01:04:50PM -0500, William Herrin wrote:
> On 12/27/05, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What is this kernel problem, how does it manifest? Which branch, 2.4 or
> > 2.6?
> >
>
> I don't know if this is the same problem you're looking for, but here are
> the symp
Can i also repoduce this on a sarge machine / what are the requirements
to get this happen. only the kernel or more?
is a chroot with sid/etch inside enough?
What can i do to help the porters with this issue.?
I know that rene is doing some OOo builds here, but i am didn't heard
the last time that
On 12/27/05, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
What is this kernel problem, how does it manifest? Which branch, 2.4 or 2.6?
I don't know if this is the same problem you're looking for, but here
are the symptoms I've seen for kernels 2.6.11 and 2.6.12:
On a Sparc netra X1, the system partial
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>What is this kernel problem, how does it manifest? Which branch, 2.4 or 2.6?
Assuming this is what I have seen on my sparc pbuilder (ultra 2, dual
300Mhz), the symptom is the system rebooting (or, less often, crashing
and needing a power cy
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 04:14:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Sun SPARC
> -
> Initially, it seemed like sparc ought to have the easiest time of the
> four to get requalified. Despite misgivings earlier this year about
> upstream support, sparc is generally doing well; since the sarge
>
21 matches
Mail list logo