ipsec for the
sparc64 platform?
There is a backport of the IPsec implementation from 2.5 to 2.4. See
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/davem/IPSEC/linux-2.4.21-ipsec.patch
It's totally unsupported, but might work for you.
noah
--
___
| Web
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
There is a backport of the IPsec implementation from 2.5 to 2.4. See
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/davem/IPSEC/linux-2.4.21-ipsec.patch
It's totally unsupported, but might work for you.
Thanks, at a first glance it seems to work, now i
Hello
I've been planning to test ipsec on my Ultra 1.
But it seems that the FreeS/WAN kernel patches for 2.4.x won't compile on
sparc64 and 2.5.69 was horribly unstable.
So my question now is if there is any other way of getting ipsec for the
sparc64 platform?
I'm also open for any suggestions
of getting ipsec for the
sparc64 platform?
Try 2.5.70. I'm not sure why you had some many problems with 2.5.69.
I've been running 2.5 on all my ultrasparc's for awhile now.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
I've been planning to test ipsec on my Ultra 1.
But it seems that the FreeS/WAN kernel patches for 2.4.x won't compile on
sparc64 and 2.5.69 was horribly unstable.
So my question now is if there is any other way of getting ipsec for the
sparc64
Jean-Francois Dive wrote:
I really thing it worth looking at the native linux implemetation in
2.5. I will upload openbsd isakmpd this week ported to linux. It does
work on intel and i'll do some test on alpha and sun (well, i still cant
install debian on my netra though).
I bet the stack
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:26:14PM -0500, Chad Miller wrote:
Well, Mips can be either Big- or Little-Endian. I've heard rumor of a
jumper on some motherboards to flip it. Of course, that sounds just
too cool to be true.
ARM can run either way too - and it doesnt even need a jumper :O)
--
van Eeden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:06:51AM +0100, Ulrich Wurst wrote:
Has anyone of you successfully managed to use ipsec on a sparc64
machine?
I've still never managed to get it working. I've basically given up on
freeswan on SPARC64
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:35:03PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote:
Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
The problem is specific to any arch where the userspace and kernel run
different bitness. Like sparc64, where userland is 32bit (same for
ppc64, mips64 and some
:06:51AM +0100, Ulrich Wurst wrote:
Has anyone of you successfully managed to use ipsec on a sparc64
machine?
I've still never managed to get it working. I've basically given up on
freeswan on SPARC64. Hopefully the ipsec implementation that's going in
to Linux 2.6 will give better results
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:31:02PM +0100, Martin Rusko wrote:
Paul Hedderly wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
In my experience, it's been unusable on anything big-endian.
Nah many people use freeswan on sparc/alpha/PPC ...
I was unable to
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:21:42AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:35:03PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote:
Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
The problem is specific to any arch where the userspace and kernel run
different bitness. Like
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:47:10AM +, Paul Hedderly wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
In my experience, it's been unusable on anything big-endian.
Nah many people use freeswan on sparc/alpha/PPC ...
I thought that both Alpha and PPC were little
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:14:56PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:47:10AM +, Paul Hedderly wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:44:06PM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
In my experience, it's been unusable on anything big-endian.
Nah many people use freeswan on
Ben Collins wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:35:03PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote:
Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
The problem is specific to any arch where the userspace and kernel run
different bitness. Like sparc64, where userland is 32bit (same for
I really thing it worth looking at the native linux implemetation in
2.5. I will upload openbsd isakmpd this week ported to linux. It does
work on intel and i'll do some test on alpha and sun (well, i still cant
install debian on my netra though).
I bet the stack part'll be working on sparc64 as
Ben Collins wrote:
The problem is specific to any arch where the userspace and kernel run
different bitness. Like sparc64, where userland is 32bit (same for
ppc64, mips64 and some other arch's atleast for a short time).
Ioctl's from userspace have to be translated in this case from 32bit
of you successfully managed to use ipsec on a sparc64
machine?
I've still never managed to get it working. I've basically given up on
freeswan on SPARC64. Hopefully the ipsec implementation that's going in
to Linux 2.6 will give better results.
I don't remember the details of the freeswan
/pipermail/bugs/2002-March/000207.html but it does
not work for me.
Has anyone of you successfully managed to use ipsec on a sparc64 machine?
Thanks,
Uli
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:06:51AM +0100, Ulrich Wurst wrote:
Has anyone of you successfully managed to use ipsec on a sparc64 machine?
I've still never managed to get it working. I've basically given up on
freeswan on SPARC64. Hopefully the ipsec implementation that's going in
to Linux 2.6
Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32?
Daniel van Eeden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:06:51AM +0100, Ulrich Wurst wrote:
Has anyone of you successfully managed to use ipsec on a sparc64 machine?
I've still never managed
21 matches
Mail list logo
