On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:06:40AM -0500, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
>
> Figured someone had, but didn't see it in the thread and can't see
> what could be different between the systems that work and those that
> don't...
>
So has anyone got a diff of the changes from 1.2.3-8.0.1 -> -9.1
That sh
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:40:31AM +0100, Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
:On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 11:37:51PM -0500, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
:>
:> Has anyone verified that:
:> PasswordAuthentication yes
:> is set in this file?
:>
:
:Sure i did that!
:
:Joerg
Figured someone had, but didn't see it in th
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 11:37:51PM -0500, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
>
> Has anyone verified that:
> PasswordAuthentication yes
> is set in this file?
>
Sure i did that!
Joerg
--
-
Joerg Braukhoff
email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
Hi,
Obviously this is biting alot of people, but not others (ie. not me)
I have 9 sun4m machines all recently installed (2.2v2 CDROM), after
first hearing about this issue, I upgraded my ssh to try and
replicate/debug the problem.
All are working well with md5 passwords, kernel 2.2.18pre21, both
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 12:09 PM
> > could i have turned off verification via PAM (i certainly didn't do it
on
> > purpose, if it's possible)? if so, how could i check that?
>
> are you using RSA keys?
i ins
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 04:09:43 -0700,
"Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> are you using RSA keys?
nope.
--
Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr | ignorami: n: The BOFH art of folding problem
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | lusers into representational shapes.
pgpuPwD2Gdkxq.pgp
Descri
> > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x5002a000)
> > libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x50053000)
> > libutil.so.1 => /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x50072000)
> > libcrypto.so.0 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0 (0x50084000)
> > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x50145000)
> > /lib/ld-linux.so.2
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 08:57:52 +,
Stuart Auchterlonie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gateway:/tmp/usr/sbin# ldd sshd
> libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x5002a000)
> libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x50053000)
> libutil.so.1 => /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x50072000)
> libcrypto
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 12:56:17PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ln -s ssh /etc/pam.d/sshd
> > >
> > > Sorry Ben, This doesn't work.
>
> I still say it is because it was not linked to PAM...we've seen this problem
> with the autobuilders lately since ssh had funky pam build-depend
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:35:45PM +0100, Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
> > i've a SPARCstation 10, i can use this machine to login via ssh
> > on every other host (all i386) in the LAN. If i try to login via ssh
> > on this machine sshd alway
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 12:56:17PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > > > > i've a SPARCstation 10, i can use this machine to login via ssh
> > > > > on every other host (all i386) in the LAN. If i try to login via ssh
> > > > > on this machine sshd always returns 'password failure'. I've tried
> >
> > > > i've a SPARCstation 10, i can use this machine to login via ssh
> > > > on every other host (all i386) in the LAN. If i try to login via ssh
> > > > on this machine sshd always returns 'password failure'. I've tried
> > > > every it from every host on the net, even 'ssh 127.0.0.1', always w
On Tuesday 23 January 2001 06:16, Stuart Auchterlonie wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:35:45PM +0100, Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i've a SPARCstation 10, i can use this machine to login via ssh
> > > on every other
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 12:02:57PM +0100, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
>
> > This machine has very little installed on it as I'm using it as a
> > firewall/gateway. It's currently running 2.2.18pre21.
>
> i'm running 2.2.17. my machine is also very minimal, though it's running a
> small number
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:01:46PM +0900, Ragga Muffin wrote:
>
> I was bitten by this too. I purged the ssh from security.debian.org
> and installed the one from testing. (had to upgrade quite a few other
> packages on the way..)
>
> ii ssh1.2.3-8.0.1Secure rlogin/rsh/rcp replac
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 12:02:57 +0100,
Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
to follow up to myself:
> i'm running 2.2.17. my machine is also very minimal, though it's running a
> small number of services.
i'm actually running the 2.2.17-smp kernel image. the machine has two CPUs.
Stuart Auchterlonie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
clip...clipp..
>
> > : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l ssh
> > : Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> > : | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> > : |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 10:34:30 +,
Stuart Auchterlonie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> debug: checking for shadow entry
> debug: shadow entry found, verifying
> debug: completed shadow checks
> debug: Attempting authentication for sauchter.
> Failed rsa for sauchter from 10.44.32.68 port 47
i have similar problems, i just apt-get installed ssh on a clean potato
install on an ultra1 accepting the default configurations ...
bruno
## client debug:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ssh -v localhost
SSH Version OpenSSH-1.2.3, protocol version 1.5.
Compiled with SSL.
debug: Reading configuration data
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 10:38:58AM +0100, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 09:16:33 +,
Well lets compare logs.
>
> : 12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:->ssh -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : SSH Version OpenSSH-1.2.3, protocol version 1.5.
> : Compiled with SSL.
> : debug: Reading configur
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 09:16:33 +,
Stuart Auchterlonie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> This is in the BTS as bug #79106 and seems to bite anyone who is
> using passwd authentication with ssh 1.2.3-9.1 that the security team
> released for potato.
IBTD. lust.cluon.priv.at is a SS10 running
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:40:23PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:35:45PM +0100, Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i've a SPARCstation 10, i can use this machine to login via ssh
> > on every other host (all i386) in the LAN. If i try to login via ssh
> > on this machi
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:35:45PM +0100, Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i've a SPARCstation 10, i can use this machine to login via ssh
> on every other host (all i386) in the LAN. If i try to login via ssh
> on this machine sshd always returns 'password failure'. I've tried every
> it from eve
> > > It's a potato system with ssh 1.2.3-9.1 . '/etc/pam.d/ssh' is the
> > > maintainer's
>
> There is no libpam.so.0 when doing 'ldd /usr/sbin/sshd' . 'ldconfig -v' says
> libpam.so.0.72 is installed.
ok...did you get your ssh from security.debian.org or stock ftp.debian.org?
if not from secu
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 02:13:45PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > > What version of ssh is it? What version of Debian? Have you looked at
> > > /etc/pam.d/ssh?
> > >
> >
> > It's a potato system with ssh 1.2.3-9.1 . '/etc/pam.d/ssh' is the
> > maintainer's
> > version of the file.
>
> hmm
> i've a SPARCstation 10, i can use this machine to login via ssh
> on every other host (all i386) in the LAN. If i try to login via ssh
> on this machine sshd always returns 'password failure'. I've tried every
> it from every host on the net, even 'ssh 127.0.0.1', always with the
> same result. '
Hi,
i've a SPARCstation 10, i can use this machine to login via ssh
on every other host (all i386) in the LAN. If i try to login via ssh
on this machine sshd always returns 'password failure'. I've tried every
it from every host on the net, even 'ssh 127.0.0.1', always with the
same result. '/etc/
27 matches
Mail list logo
