On Monday 17 July 2006 16:40, Kevin Diggs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally stumbled around and got X working on this thing. I had to use
> sunffb as the device, set the mouse device to /dev/sunmouse, and change
> the protocol to MouseSystems. How do I get the resolution up to
> 1280x1024? Got a mod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Kevin Diggs wrote:
Hi,
I finally stumbled around and got X working on this thing. I had to
use sunffb as the device, set the mouse device to /dev/sunmouse, and change
the protocol to MouseSystems. How do I get the resolution
Hi,
I finally stumbled around and got X working on this thing. I had to use
sunffb as the device, set the mouse device to /dev/sunmouse, and change
the protocol to MouseSystems. How do I get the resolution up to
1280x1024? Got a modeline, anyone?
Any pointers on how to upgrade the kernel t
Title:
The Secret on How PORN STARS Grew Big DICKS !
The answer is here.
Turn off notifications here.
.
MM International
Exports Ltd
St. #7701Belize City,
Belize
.
Try and support us!!!
www.yahoo.com
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the delay getting to look at these but can you try the
included patch.
Richard
Adam McKenna writes:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:30:03AM +0100, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> > That looks similar to the errors that I first got when the csr0 values
> > were set wrongly. I wonder
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:30:03AM +0100, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> That looks similar to the errors that I first got when the csr0 values
> were set wrongly. I wonder if a chip register is not getting setup
> correctly in certain circumstances. The main thing that I did with
> this was to have a l
That looks similar to the errors that I first got when the csr0 values
were set wrongly. I wonder if a chip register is not getting setup
correctly in certain circumstances. The main thing that I did with
this was to have a look at the chip registers and looked at what was
different between working
So, I finally managed to get Debian installed on my Netra X1, I now have a
repeatable problem (well, repeatable in the sense that it happens every other
boot.) I figured I'd start a new thread, and trim the headers, since I
figure most of the people who were included in the last thread are on one
you can now go to
http://www.laughingstormdogs.com
and get a couple of new songs
not totally finished, only one coat of polish
you can also link to our two other sites
more to come.
> On Jan 26, Doug Alcorn scratched in indelible ink :
try setting console to the serial port:
setenv console=ttya (or ttyb)
at the PROM.
or passing the same to the kernel bootflags string:
console=/dev/ttyS0
/Jp...
--
Jean-Paul Blaquière || Avatar of Computational
[EMAIL PR
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 05:32:44PM -0500, Doug Alcorn wrote:
> I'm pretty sure there is no keyboard plugged in. When I go through
> the openboot sequence on the console it reports that there is no
> keyboard.
I can definitely vouch that Potato is installable over a serial
interface -- I've done
Sorry about the bad subject line before. I did a reply in my mail
client to get the quoting of the other message and forgot to change
it.
"Rafael E. Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doug Alcorn wrote:
> > Staff Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I've setup RARP and TFTP service
Doug Alcorn wrote:
> Staff Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've setup RARP and TFTP service on the network.
> > You should be able to boot off the network. However, it appears
> > that Debian defaults to using the on-board video if it finds it (yours
> > has one built in that can't be r
I have recently leased a couple of Sun Sparc IPXes as dedicated
servers from an ISP (netmar.com). The main reason I went with netmar
was because I could install whatever OS I wanted to over the serial
console. They have the console running through a terminal server with
access through ssh.
The s
At 21:47 -0500 2000-05-03, David Engel wrote:
>On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:27:21PM -0400, David Huggins-Daines wrote:
>> c) We have a patch for our libc on Sparc that has its own version of
>> ldconfig, and this version of ldconfig uses a *different* flag to
>> indicate ELF64 libraries (deb
> The Sparc people should probably sit down and figure out a good way to
> do all this that won't break other archs.
Sparc 64bit userland is supported only in glibc 2.2 and higher, which has
its own ldconfig in the tree. The constants used there are the right ones.
Jakub
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:27:21PM -0400, David Huggins-Daines wrote:
> Well, I didn't even get to file a bug report and patch to ld.so before
> the new package was uploaded, and I spent several hours today tracking
> the problem, too. I guess I should get into the habit of tracking
I figured the
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sparc has seperate dynamic loaders for 32 and 64 bit code. AFAIK, you
> can't load 64bit from a 32bit program, atleast not on sparc. Which is why
> we have gotten Wichert to use objdump (and hopefully soon I can convert
> him to readelf) in order to get li
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:27:21PM -0400, David Huggins-Daines wrote:
> Well, I didn't even get to file a bug report and patch to ld.so before
> the new package was uploaded, and I spent several hours today tracking
> the problem, too. I guess I should get into the habit of tracking
> incoming for
Well, I didn't even get to file a bug report and patch to ld.so before
the new package was uploaded, and I spent several hours today tracking
the problem, too. I guess I should get into the habit of tracking
incoming for this sort of thing. It sure would be nice if (a) the BTS
were faster, and (b
ed with the apt-get utility. When I was running slink
I had the sparc cds so I just installed stuff directly with dselect. I was
able to load up Samba and Apache and that is fine. I have noticed that
occasionally I end up with Defunct processes on them (I think that I may
just be asking to
t;
> The stock 2.2.5 kernel or the cvs 2.2.5 kernel?
I've tried both.
> I just tried your new glibc on the SS20 here, and it works fine
> (2.2.5-cvs kernel). I just installed it over a fresh slink base
> image.
Do you maybe have a lower end sun4m like an ss5 or LX to try on?
s kernel). I just installed it over a fresh slink base
image.
I've backed my sun4u to glibc 2.0.105 so I can compile some stuff for
slink. (Update the gnome packages - I can't really do this on an xia
machine without root since it involves build, install, build, install
cycles.)
Someb
On Sat, Apr 17, 1999 at 11:02:40PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve> Also - I've never had the init locking syndrome on my SS20
> Steve> - I've had lock ups during the boot sequence, but never
> Steve> init itself. What ke
> "Steve" == Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> Also - I've never had the init locking syndrome on my SS20
Steve> - I've had lock ups during the boot sequence, but never
Steve> init itself. What kernel is Stephen running?
This is with a 2.2.0-pre7 kernel. I've got 2.
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 11:51:28PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > > "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ben> Ok, I've recompiled glibc 2.1.1 with a cvs checkout from
> > Ben> today. Seems to work pretty well on my ultra. The
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 11:51:28PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben> Ok, I've recompiled glibc 2.1.1 with a cvs checkout from
> Ben> today. Seems to work pretty well on my ultra. The problems
> Ben> that you and I experienced ha
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 11:51:28PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben> Ok, I've recompiled glibc 2.1.1 with a cvs checkout from
> Ben> today. Seems to work pretty well on my ultra. The problems
> Ben> that you and I experienced ha
> "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> Ok, I've recompiled glibc 2.1.1 with a cvs checkout from
Ben> today. Seems to work pretty well on my ultra. The problems
Ben> that you and I experienced have gone away (apt-get works
Ben> again). Now I just need some kind a
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 07:56:40PM +, Steve Dunham wrote:
> I can probably put Debian on the SS20 here again. (I've been using
> the machine to develop a Red Hat "kickstart" install for our local
> setup.) I can definitely test on my Ultra machine (which did have
> problems with your 2.2.1-0.
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 10:35:39AM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote:
> > >Ben, I'm currently recompiling without sigstack and sigaction. (So I
> > >just have your chown patch.) If it works, we may also want to add the
> > >attached patch (it may fix the problem
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 10:35:39AM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote:
> >Ben, I'm currently recompiling without sigstack and sigaction. (So I
> >just have your chown patch.) If it works, we may also want to add the
> >attached patch (it may fix the problems with non-cvs kernels).
>
> Send me the latest v
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 07:33:10PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Ben> This does not show in the ChangeLog for 2.1.1-0.2.
>
> The patch went in the same day and therefore it should be in 2.1.1-0.2
> (looking at the dates). Nevertheless, I'm appending the patch so that
> you can check yourself.
Th
> Ben Collins writes:
Ben> On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 06:52:34PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> > There were a few differences: They have nothing resembling our
>> > sigaction, and sigstack patches (are they still needed?) They have an
>> > additional "libio-vfork" patch, which may fix our prob
At 16:25 + 1999-04-16, Steve Dunham wrote:
There were a few differences: They have nothing resembling our
sigaction, and sigstack patches (are they still needed?) They have an
Christian Meder told me they were required for glibc to work with
2.0.x kernels on sparc.
additional "libio-vf
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 06:52:34PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > There were a few differences: They have nothing resembling our
> > sigaction, and sigstack patches (are they still needed?) They have an
> > additional "libio-vfork" patch, which may fix our problems with
> > non-cvs kernels (
>>>>> Steve Dunham writes:
> Ben,
> I'm still trying to figure out the glibc 2.1.1 stuff. A lot of stuff
> seems to break if I use your 2.1.1-0.2 package (on a sun4u machine).
> I'm not sure why (the 2.1.1-0.1.1 package worked fine). I tried a
> re
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 04:25:01PM +, Steve Dunham wrote:
> There were a few differences: They have nothing resembling our
> sigaction, and sigstack patches (are they still needed?) They have an
> additional "libio-vfork" patch, which may fix our problems with
> non-cvs kernels (I'm not sure,
Ben,
I'm still trying to figure out the glibc 2.1.1 stuff. A lot of stuff
seems to break if I use your 2.1.1-0.2 package (on a sun4u machine).
I'm not sure why (the 2.1.1-0.1.1 package worked fine). I tried a
recompile of the 0.2 package and it didn't help (2.2.5+cvs kernel).
it'll just create
Chris> symlinks, and not get the darned files. I just want to get
Chris> the Sparc stuff, I dont' want to have to transfer any of
Chris> the 'binary-all' directories. (plus, i'd like to be able
Chris> to make a CD, and hav
Chris Trainor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok, this isn't exactly on-topic here, but i'm trying to find a mirroring
> program that's like decent. i tried mirror, and fmirror, and both suck.
> it'll just create symlinks, and not get the darned files. I just wa
, there is a way cool Mirror prog.. called Wget.
It's for nabbing stuff via FTP or WWW. Now this. will nab the entire
planet IF you really want.
:)
You will find it easy.. I don't need to give you a location.
Richard Parkinson Ph 64
ok, this isn't exactly on-topic here, but i'm trying to find a mirroring
program that's like decent. i tried mirror, and fmirror, and both suck.
it'll just create symlinks, and not get the darned files. I just want to
get the Sparc stuff, I dont' want to have to transf
>Umm, well I am at the point where I am using Dselect to install all the
>crap I want, including X and stuff... but it gets so far, then complains
>about depending and needing packages which are not available.
>I can't remember which ones they were off the top of my head. I am a
Umm, well I am at the point where I am using Dselect to install all the
crap I want, including X and stuff... but it gets so far, then complains
about depending and needing packages which are not available.
I can't remember which ones they were off the top of my head. I am at work
and
It's been a long winter here, and I've finally go some time to spare,
and would like to get Debian sparc up and running.
I have three sparc, and one x86 (Pentium) system to work with. The
sparc systems are 2 LX, and 1 1+. I'd like to get the 1+ running Deb.
The Pentium is running Deb, and has be
47 matches
Mail list logo
