I've read the wiki page. I'm fine with the proposed approach. I note
that by including pam_lastlog2.so in a pam-auth-update configuration,
other services (gdm, for example) will include lastlog info.
The fact that gdm and other display managers do not include
pam_lastlog.so suggests that it's u
On 2024-04-08 15:46 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> To clarify, because I think there is still some ongoing
> confusion regarding binary files and binary packages, here a table:
>
> Debian package name | (primary) file(s)
>
>
* Iker Pedrosa [240408 09:19]:
> > >- Did you consider using a systemd service to upgrade from lastlog to
> > >lastlog2 data?
> >
> > No, I did not consider this, as I wasn't aware of any
> > implementations for this. Does u-l upstream ship such a service?
> >
>
> Yes,
> https://github.co
* Colin Watson [240408 10:55]:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:19:09AM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 11:48 PM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > > util-linux upstream provides three binary objects to be built:
> > > - liblastlog2.so
> > > - pam_lastlog2.so
> > > - lastlog2 (progra
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:19:09AM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 11:48 PM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > util-linux upstream provides three binary objects to be built:
> > - liblastlog2.so
> > - pam_lastlog2.so
> > - lastlog2 (program)
> >
> > Debian's PAM policy says to put P
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 11:48 PM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Iker Pedrosa [240403 09:43]:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > I have some questions regarding your proposal:
> >
> >- What is the difference between liblastlog2 and libpam-lastlog2
> >binaries? Upstream util-linux only provi
Hi,
* Iker Pedrosa [240403 09:43]:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I have some questions regarding your proposal:
>
>- What is the difference between liblastlog2 and libpam-lastlog2
>binaries? Upstream util-linux only provides one binary (lastlog2) so this
>confuses me.
util-linux upstream provide
Hi Chris,
I have some questions regarding your proposal:
- What is the difference between liblastlog2 and libpam-lastlog2
binaries? Upstream util-linux only provides one binary (lastlog2) so this
confuses me.
- Did you consider using a systemd service to upgrade from lastlog to
las
Hi everyone,
* Chris Hofstaedtler [240330 01:42]:
> > So, after some of the current fog clears, src:util-linux could
[..]
> >
> > Does this seem right?
I've put everything I know of into this wiki page:
https://wiki.debian.org/PamLastlog2
I would invite you all to review / edit it as you s
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:41:40AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:32:08AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > > It seems desirable to ship liblastlog2 in trixie, considering that the
> > > /var/log/las
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 08:32:40AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> So we could either put pam_lastlog2.so into a common-* file from
> >> src:pam, or openssh and shadow should switch their setup.
> >> What do we all think about that?
> > pam should not be adding any modules to common-* that it its
On 2024-03-29 20:36 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:41:40AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>> Hi OpenSSH, shadow Maintainers,
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:32:08AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:41:40AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi OpenSSH, shadow Maintainers,
>
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:32:08AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > > It seems desirable to ship liblastlog2 in trixie, co
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:41:40AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi OpenSSH, shadow Maintainers,
>
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:32:08AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > > It seems desirable to ship liblastlog2 in trixie, co
Hi OpenSSH, shadow Maintainers,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:32:08AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > It seems desirable to ship liblastlog2 in trixie, considering that the
> > /var/log/lastlog file is not Y2038-safe and pam in unst
15 matches
Mail list logo
