Re: Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange

2024-04-01 Thread Howard Chu
Damien Miller wrote: > Another thing we're considering in OpenSSH is changing how we integrate > with PAM. PAM's API demands loading modules into the authenticating > process' address space, but obviously we've just been reminded that this > is risky. This was a long-standing problem with

Re: Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange

2024-04-01 Thread Sirius
In days of yore (Tue, 02 Apr 2024), Colin Watson thus quoth: > TCP wrappers > Not used hosts.{allow,deny} for the last 17 years (since I started my current employment) so I am biased. Honest opinion is that firewall and fail2ban have pretty much obsoleted TCP wrappers. > SELinux >

Re: Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange

2024-04-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Christoph Anton Mitterer writes: > Actually I think that most sites where I "need"/use GSSAPI... only > require the ticket for AFS, and do actually allow pubkey auth (but > right now, one doesn't have AFS access then). In past discussions of this patch, this has not been the case. One of the

Re: Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange

2024-04-01 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey. On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 01:30 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > All the same, I'm aware that some people now depend on having this > facility in Debian's main openssh package: I get enough occasional > bug > reports to convince me that it's still in use. Being one of those people, and having even

Re: Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange

2024-04-01 Thread Damien Miller
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024, Colin Watson wrote: [I'm not subscribed to the debian-* lists, please Cc me in replies if you want me to see them] > [I've CCed openssh-unix-dev for awareness, but set Mail-Followup-To to > just debian-devel and debian-ssh to avoid potentially spamming them > with a long

Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange

2024-04-01 Thread Colin Watson
[I've CCed openssh-unix-dev for awareness, but set Mail-Followup-To to just debian-devel and debian-ssh to avoid potentially spamming them with a long discussion. If you choose to override this then that's your call, but please be mindful of upstream's time.] Following the xz-utils backdoor, I'm

Bug#1068162: Please consider adding MP-TCP support

2024-04-01 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Thanks for your reply, Colin. > While I realize that this doesn't introduce a new external dependency, I > have to say that this is not the week to be asking for a new distro > patch to OpenSSH! Point taken. > I'd be happy to include this if upstream does, but I don't think I'm > likely to

Processed: Re: Bug#1068162: Please consider adding MP-TCP support

2024-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 wontfix Bug #1068162 [openssh-server] Please consider adding MP-TCP support Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 1068162: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068162 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1068162: Please consider adding MP-TCP support

2024-04-01 Thread Colin Watson
Control: tags -1 wontfix On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 01:21:27AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Please consider applying the following patch: > > https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/335 > > MP-TCP support allows moving from one IP address to another without > breaking connections,