On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > Since I'd like regexplorer to propagate to testing, I'd like to ask
> > whether there is a known fix for this, or whether I should ask ftp-maste
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Since I'd like regexplorer to propagate to testing, I'd like to ask
> whether there is a known fix for this, or whether I should ask ftp-masters
> to remove regexplorer_1.6.0-1.2_alpha.deb from the archive.
Alp
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Since I'd like regexplorer to propagate to testing, I'd like to ask
> > whether there is a known fix for this, or whether I should ask ftp-masters
> > to remo
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Since I'd like regexplorer to propagate to testing, I'd like to ask
> whether there is a known fix for this, or whether I should ask ftp-masters
> to remove regexplorer_1.6.0-1.2_alpha.deb from the archive.
Please don't - p
Hi
Regexplorer, one of my packages, triggers an internal compiler error on
alpha, preventing regexplorer from propagating to testing. As compilation
succeeded in the past, using the same upstream version, I suppose the
alpha environment changed somehow.
Since I'd like regexplorer to propaga
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > Since I'd like regexplorer to propagate to testing, I'd like to ask
> > whether there is a known fix for this, or whether I should ask ftp-maste
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Since I'd like regexplorer to propagate to testing, I'd like to ask
> whether there is a known fix for this, or whether I should ask ftp-masters
> to remove regexplorer_1.6.0-1.2_alpha.deb from the archiv
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Since I'd like regexplorer to propagate to testing, I'd like to ask
> > whether there is a known fix for this, or whether I should ask ftp-masters
> > to remo
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Since I'd like regexplorer to propagate to testing, I'd like to ask
> whether there is a known fix for this, or whether I should ask ftp-masters
> to remove regexplorer_1.6.0-1.2_alpha.deb from the archive.
Please don't - p
Hi
Regexplorer, one of my packages, triggers an internal compiler error on
alpha, preventing regexplorer from propagating to testing. As compilation
succeeded in the past, using the same upstream version, I suppose the
alpha environment changed somehow.
Since I'd like regexplorer to prop
10 matches
Mail list logo