rsyslog not sending message to remote syslog.

i have deployed logAnalyzer and been using it for about 4 months. things seems to be working find but today i found out that my /var/log/syslog contains this Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.347932] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.348008] ata1.00: error: { UNC

Re: How to enlarge LUKS partition ?

En l'an 2012, le lundi 20 août, vers 20 h 23 mn, J. B écrivait: > Is there anyone who is successful increasing LUKS partition ? Hi, here is how I have "successfully" increased my LUKS partition: http://lists.debian.org/20120611070906.ga4...@delanoe.org (Some text in French but commands can be e

how to fix logical bad sectors

i am using RAID 1 on 2x500GB harddrives. and one of my drive shows Current_Pending_Sector 154. how can i fix that. root@lion:~# smartctl -A /dev/sda 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 200 200 051Pre-fail Always - 1 3 Spin_Up_Time0x0027 152 150 021Pre-f

Re: How to mount .ccd image under GNOME?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian writes: > On Sun 26 Aug 2012 at 17:53:32 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: > >> I've got a .ccd image that I want to mount, e.g. in /mnt. Associated >> with the .ccd file, there is a .img too. I tried mounting the .img using >> various CLI combinati

Re: How to enlarge LUKS partition ?

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:12:36 +0200 Alexandre wrote: > En l'an 2012, le lundi 20 août, vers 20 h 23 mn, J. B écrivait: > > Is there anyone who is successful increasing LUKS partition ? > > Hi, > here is how I have "successfully" increased my LUKS partition: > > http://lists.debian.org/201206110

Re: Obtaining a Newer Kernel

On 27.8.2012 6:32, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: That will get him the latest kernel for his particular distribution ("testing", "wheezy", etc). The current kernel for either testing or unstable is 3.2; the current for experimental is 3.4; the current at kernel.org is 3.5. http://packages.debian.org/exp

Re: how to fix logical bad sectors

Good time of the day, Muhammad. You wrote: > i am using RAID 1 on 2x500GB harddrives. and one of my drive shows > Current_Pending_Sector 154. how can i fix that. I also did not have such a problem. But I think, that You have not to worry about this unless huge amount of sectors will become bad

Re: how to fix logical bad sectors

but my /var/log/syslog showing this Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.347932] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.348008] ata1.00: error: { UNC } Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.372478] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.372487

Reseed Help

I am trying to implement the preseed information contained on: http://users.telenet.be/mydotcom/howto/linux/autoinventory.htm In the section "debian installer preseed file' there is a command sequence: TARGET="/root/inventory" debconf-get-selections --installer > $TARGET/$TARGET/list_packages_

Re: How to mount .ccd image under GNOME?

On Mon 27 Aug 2012 at 10:23:31 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: > Thanks for the two messages. > $ ccd2iso fv.ccd fv.iso > Error at sector 0. > The sector does not contain complete data. Sector size must be 2352, > while actual data read is 772 > > What's happening? The image file should not be corru

Re: [SOLVED] Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

> I run an SSD on my MCP61P so lack of NCQ has no impact > whatsoever--SSD's have no moving parts, and all seeks > are instantaneous. While I haven't heard of NCQ improving read speed of SSDs, it can have a significant positive impact on write speed for SSDs. Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Realtek RTL8111/8168B death

On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:32:23 +0200, Gareth de Vaux wrote: > Hi all, after about 3 weeks into a new machine the network card started > dying pretty regularly with these oopses: > > Aug 21 23:03:49 fire kernel: [ 2656.192450] [ cut here > ] > Aug 21 23:03:49 fire kernel: [

Re: Windows 2003 AD to Samba4 Migration

On 27/08/12 02:54, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: any help please? On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i wanted to migrate Windows 2003 AD to Samba For DC with out rejoining the clients and down time.Such as Additional Domain Controller actually, i am Planning migrating

Re: Re (3): mp3 to speex

On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 10:47:11 -0700, peasthope wrote: > From: Camaleon > Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:12:17 + (UTC) >> You mean "--demuxdump-file" is for that? :-? > > That was my speculation. From the 305671 kiB > http://wiki.videolan.org/VLC_command-line_help how might the the > destination b

Re: Obtaining a Newer Kernel

On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:51:54 -0500, Alex Robbins wrote: > I am running Debian testing, which currently has kernel 3.2.23-1, same > as unstable. experimental has 3.5.something. I am looking to run > kernel version 3.3 or higher. > > As I understand it, there are 2 ways to go about this. I could

Re: How to enlarge LUKS partition ?

[Subscribed to the list, I do not need cc, thanks] En l'an 2012, le lundi 27 août, vers 15 h 10 mn, J. B écrivait: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:12:36 +0200 > Alexandre wrote: > > > En l'an 2012, le lundi 20 août, vers 20 h 23 mn, J. B écrivait: > > > Is there anyone who is successful increasing LUKS

Re: alsa-base breaks linux-sound-base

On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 21:41:46 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote: > On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:10:03 +0200 > Camaleón wrote: > >> If package "linux-sound-base" has been dropped and this generates an >> error in your system, you better report it, > > Thanks for this advice maybe I should report that when r

Re: how to fix logical bad sectors

On Monday 27 August 2012 13:21:41 Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.347932] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR } > Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.348008] ata1.00: error: { UNC } > Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.372478] ata1.00: configured for > UDMA/133 Aug 27 12:

Re: pulseaudio configuration question

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:13:36 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 07:18:04PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote: >> Good time of the day, Jude. >> >> >> > The Holy Father is neither jude >> >> Could You please stop This Name in vain?! > > Could You please stop criticising people's sign

Re: How to mount .ccd image under GNOME?

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:23:31 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: > Brian writes: > >> On Sun 26 Aug 2012 at 17:53:32 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: >> >>> I've got a .ccd image that I want to mount, e.g. in /mnt. Associated >>> with the .ccd file, there is a .img too. I tried mounting the .img >>> using

Re: Samba 4 on Debian Wheezy

On 24/08/12 13:03, Camaleón wrote: On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:52:38 -0300, Federico Alberto Sayd wrote: Anyone has tried to implement samba4 in Debian Wheezy? (...) I am investigating this new version that provides Active Directory functionality. I have installed the samba4 packages and provisio

Re: how to fix logical bad sectors

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:21:41 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Sthu Deus wrote: >> Good time of the day, Muhammad. >> >> >> You wrote: >> >>> i am using RAID 1 on 2x500GB harddrives. and one of my drive shows >>> Current_Pending_Sector 154. how can i fix that.

RE: Dual-Monitor help

> Also, consider using a backported kernel (with xorg and mesa) instead a > self-compiled one. > I am certainly willing to try that. Thanks for the suggestion. > > I would center first in getting the correct driver to be loaded and then > go with the dual card setup. Good luck then and report b

Re: pulseaudio configuration question

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:16:35 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: Jude, please, next time remember to reply at the bottom of the message :-) > Script done on Mon 27 Aug 2012 12:11:50 AM EDT On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, > Camale?n > wrote: > >> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 23:45:12 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: >> >> > By

Re: Obtaining a Newer Kernel

Pertti Kosunen writes: > On 27.8.2012 6:32, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: >> That will get him the latest kernel for his particular distribution >> ("testing", "wheezy", etc). The current kernel for either testing or >> unstable is 3.2; the current for experimental is 3.4; the current at >> kernel.org is

Re: [SOLVED] Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

On 8/27/2012 8:27 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> I run an SSD on my MCP61P so lack of NCQ has no impact >> whatsoever--SSD's have no moving parts, and all seeks >> are instantaneous. > > While I haven't heard of NCQ improving read speed of SSDs, it can have > a significant positive impact on write s

pcieport: Multiple Corrected error received and can't find device

Hi, I'm experiencing a lot of strange errors in the logs about a pci port device. Aug 27 13:36:42 n2 kernel: [ 2350.344677] pcieport :00:03.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 Aug 27 13:36:42 n2 kernel: [ 2350.344683] pcieport :00:03.0: can't find device of ID0018 Aug 27 13:

Squeeze, Empathy and Facebook chat

Hello, Since (approx) two weeks ago Empathy doesn't work with Facebook chat in Squeeze. Previously it was working fine. I was googling but didn't find a reason. Could you help me, please?. Thanks. Best Regards, -- ximolis...@yahoo.es -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.d

Re: pcieport: Multiple Corrected error received and can't find device

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:47:39 -0300, Damian Montaldo wrote: > Hi, I'm experiencing a lot of strange errors in the logs about a pci > port device. > > Aug 27 13:36:42 n2 kernel: [ 2350.344677] pcieport :00:03.0: AER: > Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 > Aug 27 13:36:42 n2 kernel: [

Re: pcieport: Multiple Corrected error received and can't find device

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Camaleón wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:47:39 -0300, Damian Montaldo wrote: > >> Hi, I'm experiencing a lot of strange errors in the logs about a pci >> port device. > > (...) > > There's more information about those message in this bug report for Ubuntu: > > http

Bind9 - help - wildcard priority fail.

Hi,   I'm having problem with newest Bind9 (9.7.3). In version 9.6-ESV-R1 it works fine. The problem is that wildcard records are taking priority to more specific ones.   For example (adresses are fake, dont bother to checking it out):     --

Re: Obtaining a Newer Kernel

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:25:11 -0500 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 8/26/2012 7:44 PM, Alex Robbins wrote: > > > need something more recent than testing > > Why? IIRC you previously mentioned you *needed* 3.3 or higher. Can you > tell use what feature it is you need that was introduced in 3.3? > >

Re: Obtaining a Newer Kernel

On 08/27/2012 08:45 AM, Camaleón wrote: On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:51:54 -0500, Alex Robbins wrote: I am running Debian testing, which currently has kernel 3.2.23-1, same as unstable. experimental has 3.5.something. I am looking to run kernel version 3.3 or higher. As I understand it, there are

Re: How to mount .ccd image under GNOME?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Camaleón writes: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:23:31 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: > >> Brian writes: >> >>> On Sun 26 Aug 2012 at 17:53:32 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: >>> I've got a .ccd image that I want to mount, e.g. in /mnt. Associated wi

Re: Obtaining a Newer Kernel

On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:39:42 -0400 Gary Dale wrote: ... > Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source > from kernel.org and compiling it. At least some attempt is made to make > it work in the Debian ecosystem. As Stan points out in another message in this thread, the

Re: Obtaining a Newer Kernel

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:04:39 -0500 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 8/26/2012 6:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote: > > > Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source > > from kernel.org and compiling it. > > I disagree. I've been running late model vanilla kernels with Stable > for many

Re: Obtaining a Newer Kernel

On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:31 -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:39:42 -0400 > Gary Dale wrote: > > ... > > > Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source > > from kernel.org and compiling it. At least some attempt is made to make > > it work in the Debian eco

Re: Obtaining a Newer Kernel

On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:38 -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:04:39 -0500 > Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > > On 8/26/2012 6:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote: > > > > > Experimental kernels are probably better than downloading the source > > > from kernel.org and compiling it. > > > > I disagree.

debian sid bug?

Hello. I'm using debian sid. When I try to update the system I have the error: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64: libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64 depends on libqtcore4 (= 4:4.8.2-2+b1); however: Version of libqtcore4:amd64 on system is 4:4.8.2+dfsg-1 Is it stil

Re: Reseed Help

r...@aarden.us wrote: > I am trying to implement the preseed information contained on: > http://users.telenet.be/mydotcom/howto/linux/autoinventory.htm > > In the section "debian installer preseed file' there is a command > sequence: > TARGET="/root/inventory" > debconf-get-selections --install

Re: debian sid bug?

On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 22:13 +0200, Mauro wrote: > Hello. > I'm using debian sid. > When I try to update the system I have the error: > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64: > libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64 depends on libqtcore4 (= 4:4.8.2-2+b1); however: > Versi

Re: debian sid bug?

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:13:25 +0200 Mauro wrote: > Hello. > I'm using debian sid. > When I try to update the system I have the error: > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of > libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64: libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64 depends on > libqtcore4 (= 4:4.8.2-2+b1); however: Versio

Re: debian sid bug?

Mauro wrote: > I'm using debian sid. > When I try to update the system I have the error: > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64: > libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64 depends on libqtcore4 (= 4:4.8.2-2+b1); however: > Version of libqtcore4:amd64 on system is 4:4.8.2+

Re: debian sid bug?

On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 22:28 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 22:13 +0200, Mauro wrote: > > Hello. > > I'm using debian sid. > > When I try to update the system I have the error: > > > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64: > > libqt4-sql-sq

Re: debian sid bug?

On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 22:38 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 22:28 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 22:13 +0200, Mauro wrote: > > > Hello. > > > I'm using debian sid. > > > When I try to update the system I have the error: > > > > > > dpkg: dependency problems

Re: debian sid bug?

At Joe and Bob. Do you use multi arch? It seems to be a problem for multi arch. Regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1346100391.1286.21.camel

Re: debian sid bug?

On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 22:28 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of > libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64: > > libqt4-sql-sqlite:amd64 depends on libqtcore4 (= 4:4.8.2-2+b1); > however: > > Version of libqtcore4:amd64 on system is 4:4.8.2+dfsg-1 Oops, perhaps no mu

Re: debian sid bug?

On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 23:05 +0200, Mauro wrote: > On 27 August 2012 22:46, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > At Joe and Bob. Do you use multi arch? It seems to be a problem for > > multi arch. > > I've used multiarch to instal skype but later I've removed it and > removed i386 architecture. You should rep

Re: pulseaudio configuration question

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Camale?n wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:16:35 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > Jude, please, next time remember to reply at the bottom of the message :-) > > > Script done on Mon 27 Aug 2012 12:11:50 AM EDT On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, > > Camale?n > > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 25 Au

Re: debian sid bug?

Ralf Mardorf wrote: > At Joe and Bob. Do you use multi arch? It seems to be a problem for > multi arch. I do because multiarch is now a capability of dpkg and I use dpkg. But I haven't used it explicitly. I am running a pure 64-bit amd64 installation without any explicit ia32 packages installated

Re: [SOLVED] Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:42:54 -0400 (EDT), Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Stephen Powell wrote: >> I know enough to be dangerous, but not >> always enough to be competent. That's why I opened this thread >> in the first place. > > In this case the solution is as simple as downloading and reading the > man

Re: [SOLVED] Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

Stephen Powell writes: > So why are there motherboards available for 32-bit processors that > support installing more than 4G of RAM? -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

Re: How to Mount USB Stick

 Thank you all.  This was very informative and gave several viewpoint which lead me to discover mounting via label.    The main reason for my current activities is to have a record of the entire configuration process for later automation.  Of course, I ran into the reason for this, I forgot where

Re: pulseaudio configuration question

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Camaleón wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:13:36 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 07:18:04PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote: >>> Good time of the day, Jude. >>> >>> >>> > The Holy Father is neither jude >>> >>> Could You please stop This Name in va

import version and changelog into deb?

I've got a specialized piece of software I wrote and maintain (it's a theatre sound system, for playing music cues and sound effects for live theatre). In order to distribute among the various computers I use it on, I've packaged it as a .deb. I also use svn for version control, and autotools to

Re: [SOLVED] Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

Stephen Powell writes: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:42:54 -0400 (EDT), Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> Stephen Powell wrote: >>> I know enough to be dangerous, but not >>> always enough to be competent. That's why I opened this thread >>> in the first place. >> >> In this case the solution is as simple as

Re: Re: Reseed Help

 Bob,   That was great.  It is just the way I learn best.    ray   -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827182402.1753ead7c2b35a7d15c5b99498690bcc.d7d57

Re: pulseaudio configuration question

On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 20:30 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Camaleón wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:13:36 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 07:18:04PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote: > >>> Good time of the day, Jude. > >>> > >>> > >>> > T

startx, gnome 3 and system-wide default session

Hi, I get into X by startx (not lightdm). How can I define the default gnome session (gnome-classic instead of 2d/3d) system-wide for all users? Thanks -- Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply) http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/ http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: Setting up to do repetitive installs on ONE machine (cf BabelBox)

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:03:57 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > In any case with all packages locally available it speeds things up > considerably for doing repeated installations. It is actually kinder to > the upstream file servers because I have many machines and am often > doing many installations in

Re: trying to umount a chroot /dev

On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:54:09 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: >> > Why did you choose "rbind" over "bind". Just curious. >> >> The advantage of using "rbind" is that you don't have to mount >> "/dev/pts" and "/dev/shm" (or just "/dev/pts" on wheezy since >> "/dev/shm" has been moved to "/run/shm") afte

Re: Setting up to do repetitive installs on ONE machine (cf BabelBox)

T o n g wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > In any case with all packages locally available it speeds things up > > considerably for doing repeated installations. It is actually kinder to > > the upstream file servers because I have many machines and am often > > doing many installations in rapid succe

Re: [SOLVED] Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

Stephen Powell wrote: > By the way, there's something I don't understand. A 32-bit processor can > only access 4G of "real" (extended) memory, right? So why are there > motherboards available for 32-bit processors that support installing > more than 4G of RAM? What good is memory that the proces

Re: trying to umount a chroot /dev

T o n g wrote: > Interesting. What is systemd? (apt-cache search systemd shows me nothing) 'systemd' is an alternative 'sysvinit' system. > How can I tell if I'm using systemd or not? If you don't know then you are not using it. You are using sysvinit if you haven't manually taken action to ch

Re: [SOLVED] Is my processor 32-bit or 64-bit?

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Bob Proulx wrote: > Stephen Powell wrote: >> By the way, there's something I don't understand. A 32-bit processor can >> only access 4G of "real" (extended) memory, right? So why are there >> motherboards available for 32-bit processors that support installing >>