Le 03/12/2014 07:58, Simon Hollenbach a écrit :
Sent this to Pierre's private mail first. Sorry.
Hi Pierre,
you might want to dig further into this,
Mmm, what is my other choice ? W8 ? Ubuntu ?
as I can't see how a developer could fix the error you are
experiencing without more information.
Le 02/12/2014 23:15, Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
> Am Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2014, 18:47:38 schrieb Renaud OLGIATI:
>> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:22:13 -0700
>>
>> Aaron Toponce wrote:
It's a waste. They shouldn't have left. I'm pretty neutral about
systemd as I'm only an end user but I diskl
Sent this to Pierre's private mail first. Sorry.
Hi Pierre,
you might want to dig further into this, as I can't see how a developer
could fix the error you are experiencing without more information. Have
you tried chrooting into the unbootable system from an install cd's
rescue mode? Is there
Le 03/12/2014 06:24, Charlie a écrit :
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 03:04:00 +0100 Pierre Couderc sent:
Save the file and the do an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade.
When this is complete and everything is configured.
I did that. But I had to repeat the upgrade operation many times
until I get a cl
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 03:04:00 +0100 Pierre Couderc sent:
> > Save the file and the do an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade.
> > When this is complete and everything is configured.
> I did that. But I had to repeat the upgrade operation many times
> until I get a clear system with no more packe
Le 03/12/2014 01:17, Charlie a écrit :
Thank you very much !
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 23:27:13 +0100 Pierre Couderc sent:
1- install wheezy, all is ok, I boot and boot again. I change it to
jessie (following standard instructions)
This may not help at all because things may have changed in the
On Tue 02 Dec 2014 at 18:37:04 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> >On Tue 02 Dec 2014 at 16:52:46 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >
> >>Brian wrote:
> >>>On Wed 03 Dec 2014 at 02:27:26 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >>>
> >Do you have a citation for this?
> I'm glad you asked.
>
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 23:27:13 +0100 Pierre Couderc sent:
> 1- install wheezy, all is ok, I boot and boot again. I change it to
> jessie (following standard instructions)
This may not help at all because things may have changed in the last
couple of months, but I'll give it a larrup.
I don't kno
Brian wrote:
On Tue 02 Dec 2014 at 16:52:46 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Wed 03 Dec 2014 at 02:27:26 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Do you have a citation for this?
I'm glad you asked.
No - I "presumed" that amongst the "lots" of experts so opposed to the
late-command option,
On Tue 02 Dec 2014 at 16:52:46 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Brian wrote:
> >On Wed 03 Dec 2014 at 02:27:26 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >
> >>>Do you have a citation for this?
> >>I'm glad you asked.
> >>No - I "presumed" that amongst the "lots" of experts so opposed to the
> >>late-command op
I have a customized package, adduser, that I want to get into new VM's
early in the wheezy installation process. In particular, it must
happen before installing the "debian basic system tools" (DBST
hereafter) recommended when the installer gets to task selection. The
modified adduser tweaks the
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:47:38PM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> Another way to look at it is "forward planning for the release after Jessie,
> when systemd may well become compulsory..."
Most would call that FUD.
--
. o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
. . o . o o o . o . o o . . o
o
Am Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2014, 18:47:38 schrieb Renaud OLGIATI:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:22:13 -0700
>
> Aaron Toponce wrote:
> > > It's a waste. They shouldn't have left. I'm pretty neutral about
> > > systemd as I'm only an end user but I disklike having it forced upon me
> > > this way.
> >
>
Don Armstrong wrote:
> mad wrote:
> > I am using equivs to create simple packages with dependencies and a few
> > files.
> >
> > Now I removed one file from the equivs package and installed the
> > resulting deb file. The deb file does not contain the file but dpkg did
> > not remove the old file
Hello
I have a problem with jessie : my Acer Travelmate (P253) refuses to boot.
I have used 2 methods :
1- install wheezy, all is ok, I boot and boot again. I change it to
jessie (following standard instructions) : I can boot no more
2- I have used net installer debian-jessie-DI-b2-amd64-neti
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> I wonder... What exactly does "bind not responding" mean? any command
> that reproduces that would be handy.
>
> As this is happening in relation to suspend/resume, this would imply
> that network interfaces go down and up too. So perhaps bind is failing
> to detect the r
Brian wrote:
On Wed 03 Dec 2014 at 02:27:26 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Do you have a citation for this?
I'm glad you asked.
No - I "presumed" that amongst the "lots" of experts so opposed to the
late-command option, at least one of them would apply Kenshi's patch
(which apparently works) to
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:22:13 -0700
Aaron Toponce wrote:
> > It's a waste. They shouldn't have left. I'm pretty neutral about
> > systemd as I'm only an end user but I disklike having it forced upon me
> > this way.
> # apt-get install upstart
> # apt-get install sysvinit-core
> # apt-get insta
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 09:40:20PM +0100, Märk Owen wrote:
> It's a waste. They shouldn't have left. I'm pretty neutral about
> systemd as I'm only an end user but I disklike having it forced upon me
> this way.
# apt-get install upstart
# apt-get install sysvinit-core
# apt-get install openrc
No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 10:47:19 +0100
maderios wrote:
> Hi guys
> Not for me but interesting.
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTg1MDQ
It's a waste. They shouldn't have left. I'm pretty neutral about
systemd as I'm only an end user
On 12/02/2014 02:34 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote:
Debian has kindled a big fire with this systemd crap. It’s time to jump
ship before you only have ashes.
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
yes! Yes! RUNAWAY!! :) Ric
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in
On Wed 03 Dec 2014 at 02:27:26 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > Do you have a citation for this?
>
> I'm glad you asked.
> No - I "presumed" that amongst the "lots" of experts so opposed to the
> late-command option, at least one of them would apply Kenshi's patch
> (which apparently works) to d-
On 12/02/2014 04:47 AM, maderios wrote:
Hi guys
Not for me but interesting.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTg1MDQ
"# More about the vision
This is just a start, as bold as it sounds to call it fork, at a
process that will unfold in time and involve more people, first to
im
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, mad wrote:
> I am using equivs to create simple packages with dependencies and a few
> files.
>
> Now I removed one file from the equivs package and installed the
> resulting deb file. The deb file does not contain the file but dpkg did
> not remove the old file and says that
On 02/12/2014 20:48, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
[cut]
Also, what is EBR (or EPBR, which seems to be some sort of enhanced
whatever may be a EBR)?
Extended Boot Record on DOS disks ? Where information about extended
partition is stored.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_boot_r
Le 20.11.2014 22:26, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 21/11/14 06:45, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Scott Ferguson a écrit :
Might be worth fscking the disk first in case that's where the
problem lies.
Why ? fsck works on filesystems, not disks or partition tables.
Good question - because I didn't sp
Le 27.11.2014 03:04, Serge a écrit :
Later some people started to abuse those directories and put there
files,
that never supposed to be there. Those people don't really think
about
standards or unification. Usually they just enable displaying hidden
files
in their file manager, see a lot of do
On 3 December 2014 at 01:36, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 12/02/2014 at 07:23 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 2 December 2014 at 18:05, Patrick Bartek
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
Depends on what 'you' call "*default*". It implies a choice - as
opposed to
On 3 December 2014 at 01:18, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>> On 2 December 2014 at 18:05, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>>
On 2 December 2014 at 08:18, Patrick Bartek
wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Dec 201
On 2 December 2014 at 23:53, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>> Le Mon, 1 Dec 2014 23:05:09 -0800,
>> Patrick Bartek a écrit :
>>
>>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>>
>>> > On 2 December 2014 at 08:18, Patrick Bartek
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
On 12/02/2014 at 07:23 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 2 December 2014 at 18:05, Patrick Bartek
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> Depends on what 'you' call "*default*". It implies a choice - as
>>> opposed to "*mandatory*".
>>
>> You do have a choice, but ONLY after
Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 30 November 2014 at 02:30, Richard Owlett wrote:
Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 29 November 2014 at 08:17, Richard Owlett wrote:
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
On 11/28/14, Richard Owlett wrote:
I've just proved ( again ;/ ) that my writing lacks clarity.
It's h
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 2 December 2014 at 18:05, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>
>>> On 2 December 2014 at 08:18, Patrick Bartek
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, 01 Dec 2014, Ric Moore wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On 11/30/2014 11:27 PM,
Le 28.11.2014 15:32, Rusi Mody a écrit :
However there are some issues: if the software-versions in these
dont match up then its precisely these XDG files that tread on
each others'
toes across OSes.
Well... if configuration files are not both upward and downward
compatible between different
Le 02.12.2014 08:05, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
>> > and more and more
>> > developers will start writing apps with systemd, or parts of
it,
>> > as a dependency for the "features" it offers.
It's their choice - likewise it's your choice *not* to write
alternatives. It 'sounds' like you're pr
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le Mon, 1 Dec 2014 23:05:09 -0800,
> Patrick Bartek a écrit :
>
>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>
>> > On 2 December 2014 at 08:18, Patrick Bartek
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 01 Dec 2014, Ric Moore wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 03:26:29PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> On Sunday 30 November 2014 11:59:16 Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 12:26:36PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > > Hi Pascal,
> > >
> > > On Sunday 30 November 2014 11:15:41 Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 29 nov 14, 16:46:01, Richard Owlett wrote:
Application 2:
Extremely secure browsing and email for me on my personal machine.
https://tails.boum.org/
I wasn't thinking in terms of personal privacy, but what I think
of as "system security".
My *personal idiosy
On 2 December 2014 at 18:05, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 2 December 2014 at 08:18, Patrick Bartek
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 01 Dec 2014, Ric Moore wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 11/30/2014 11:27 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> >>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > > > as the default
On 02/12/14 00:52, lee wrote:
> Whatever ... You should have snipped your own posts to begin with.
>
> Anyway, you didn't contribute anthing to what the OP said, and I don't
> find this part of the discussion worthwhile at all.
>
Then why are you persisting with it?
--
Tony van der Hoff |
Le Mon, 1 Dec 2014 23:05:09 -0800,
Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
> > On 2 December 2014 at 08:18, Patrick Bartek
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 01 Dec 2014, Ric Moore wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 11/30/2014 11:27 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > >>
> > [snip]
> >
> >
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:49:15AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:45:12 -0500,
> Miles Fidelman a écrit :
>
> > Ric Moore wrote:
> > > On 11/30/2014 11:27 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > >
> > >> I fear that once systemd is firmly entrenched in Debian as the
> > >> defaul
Le Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:45:12 -0500,
Miles Fidelman a écrit :
> Ric Moore wrote:
> > On 11/30/2014 11:27 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> >> I fear that once systemd is firmly entrenched in Debian as the
> >> default init more distros will follow suit, and more and more
> >> developers will start w
Hi guys
Not for me but interesting.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTg1MDQ
--
Maderios
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/547d8aa7.
On Tuesday 02 December 2014 07:05:09 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> User's do contrain. They even dictate. Always have. Developers
> should, if they are samrt, be developing what customers want or need.
> Not the other way around. That's the formula for going out of business.
> Listening to your custom
Hi!
I am using equivs to create simple packages with dependencies and a few
files.
Now I removed one file from the equivs package and installed the
resulting deb file. The deb file does not contain the file but dpkg did
not remove the old file and says that the file belongs to the package.
What
46 matches
Mail list logo
