Dennis Wicks wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> Been looking but haven't found it yet.
>
> My hosting has changed servers and I have to move all my stuff pretty soon.
> I need a ftp program that will do site-to-site transfers without having to
> download to my PC first then upload to the destination.
>
> A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 01:12:34AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
[...]
> > Well the solution is to have a talk with the mail system admin who
> > reconfigured the mail system, and did a half-assed job of it.
>
> Most employers are going to reconfigure th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:11:34AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 13 Nov 2015 at 14:43:39 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > (as an aside: it's bad custom inherited from DOS to name shell scripts
> > with an .sh ending. No ending is the right
On Fri, November 13, 2015 7:52 pm, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> Been looking but haven't found it yet.
>
> My hosting has changed servers and I have to move all my
> stuff pretty soon. I need a ftp program that will do site-to-site transfers
> without having to download to my PC first then upload to the d
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
wrote:
> On Qui, 12 Nov 2015, Safwat wrote:
>>
>> I am running NoScript + Iceweasel, and I observed something weird.
>> Consider a Google search result which has this "a href" value:
>>
>>
>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://en.wikipedia.o
I do agree with Piyavkin.
AFAIT these are perhaps marketing efforts by corporations exploiting
"customer fear" and implementing their policy of "buy or suffer".
All about Linux, a user should see the message carefully and analyse before
executing a program with root privileges. That's why "sudo" an
El 13/11/15 a las 18:50, Joel Rees escribió:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Mario Castelán Castro
wrote:
[...]
joel.r...@gmail.com writes:
The question being begged is this -- Do you really want to use AVX
enough to sign the Intel agreement that you can't read unless you
agree to it before y
to...@tuxteam.de writes:
I see. But a soft emulation won't give you an idea of performance
anyway? Just thinking about the whole mess from caching down to
instruction set (all of which the emulator has wildly different
timings for)... I'd guess that the single/multi-thread issue is
just a ripple
Greetings;
Been looking but haven't found it yet.
My hosting has changed servers and I have to move all my
stuff pretty soon. I need a ftp program that will do
site-to-site transfers without having to download to my PC
first then upload to the destination.
Anybody know of such a one? I used
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Mario Castelán Castro
wrote:
> [...]
> monn...@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
>>
>> I think the question was: what makes you think AVX will improve
>> the performance of *your* code? Base64 encoding/decoding should be
>> completely bandwidth-constrained, so it seems ver
On 11/13/15 8:12 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Saturday 14 November 2015 00:43:43 Miles Fidelman wrote:
On 11/13/15 7:15 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Friday 13 November 2015 22:14:30 Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Steve Kleene wrote:
Almost five years ago, I became unable to post question
References: ,
<20151113221430.GV4773@geta>, <564683bf.1050...@meetinghouse.net>
>>>On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:41:14 + (UTC), I wrote:
>>>
>>> Almost five years ago, I became unable to post questions here by e-mail.
The
>>> e-mail bounces with, for example:
>>>
>>> > The following message to was
On Saturday 14 November 2015 00:43:43 Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On 11/13/15 7:15 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 13 November 2015 22:14:30 Don Armstrong wrote:
> >> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Steve Kleene wrote:
> >>> Almost five years ago, I became unable to post questions here by
> >>> e-mail. The
>
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Mario Castelán Castro
wrote:
> [...]
> joel.r...@gmail.com writes:
>>
>> The question being begged is this -- Do you really want to use AVX
>> enough to sign the Intel agreement that you can't read unless you
>> agree to it before you read it so you can download it
On 11/13/15 7:15 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Friday 13 November 2015 22:14:30 Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Steve Kleene wrote:
Almost five years ago, I became unable to post questions here by e-mail.
The
e-mail bounces with, for example:
The following message to was
undeliverable
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le septidi 17 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Joel Rees a écrit :
>> > The firs drawback is that it would be incompatible with GPL code and
>> > libraries, and even possibly LGPL. That means libraries made using that
>> > license can not be used from
On 11/13/2015 06:43 AM, Pol Hallen wrote:
(a) the result of the command "ls -l /home/user/bin/script1.sh"
-rwx-- 1 user000 user000 936 Dec 5 2014 script1.sh
my mistake sorry :-/
script1.sh checks (using apt-get update && apt-get upgrade) if there're
(or not) any updates availables sh
On Friday 13 November 2015 22:14:30 Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Steve Kleene wrote:
> > Almost five years ago, I became unable to post questions here by e-mail.
> > The
> >
> > e-mail bounces with, for example:
> > > The following message to was
> > > undeliverable. The reason for
On Fri 13 Nov 2015 at 16:08:07 (-0600), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, David Wright wrote:
> > The implementation isn't necessarily irrelevant when you have to
> > maintain the scripts yourself. Just at the level of pressing F3 in mc,
> > or running less, it saves time knowing what you
On 13.11.2015 23:35, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 13 November 2015 14:19:00 Piyavkin wrote:
On 12.11.2015 21:14, Ralph Katz wrote:
On 11/11/2015 10:24 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
[...]
Brian Krebs of Krebs On Security had
something on ransomware and Linux, just not labeled Ransm-C or
anyth
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Steve Kleene wrote:
> Almost five years ago, I became unable to post questions here by e-mail. The
> e-mail bounces with, for example:
>
> > The following message to was undeliverable.
> > The reason for the problem:
> > 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.1.7
> : Sender ad
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, David Wright wrote:
> The implementation isn't necessarily irrelevant when you have to
> maintain the scripts yourself. Just at the level of pressing F3 in mc,
> or running less, it saves time knowing what you expect to appear on
> the screen.
A good $EDITOR takes care of that
On Fri 13 Nov 2015 at 11:18:17 (-0600), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, David Wright wrote:
> > I name my scripts in ~/bin with an extension corresponding to their
> > contents: .pl .py .sh etc. Where I'm working on alternative versions,
> > I might have more than one language. Extensio
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:41:14 + (UTC)
Steve Kleene wrote:
>Almost five years ago, I became unable to post questions here by e-mail. The
>e-mail bounces with, for example:
>
>> The following message to was undeliverable.
>> The reason for the problem:
>> 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.1
On Friday 13 November 2015 14:19:00 Piyavkin wrote:
> On 12.11.2015 21:14, Ralph Katz wrote:
> > On 11/11/2015 10:24 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> Brian Krebs of Krebs On Security had
> >> something on ransomware and Linux, just not labeled Ransm-C or
> >> anything:
> >>
> >>
Almost five years ago, I became unable to post questions here by e-mail. The
e-mail bounces with, for example:
> The following message to was undeliverable.
> The reason for the problem:
> 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.1.7
: Sender address rejected:
undeliverable address: host syrano.acb.
On 12.11.2015 21:14, Ralph Katz wrote:
On 11/11/2015 10:24 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
[...]
Brian Krebs of Krebs On Security had
something on ransomware and Linux, just not labeled Ransm-C or
anything:
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2015/11/ransomware-now-gunning-for-your-web-sites/
IF I'm unde
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, David Wright wrote:
> I name my scripts in ~/bin with an extension corresponding to their
> contents: .pl .py .sh etc. Where I'm working on alternative versions,
> I might have more than one language. Extensionless filenames are
> either links or binaries. What's bad about this
>Could it be NoScript itself, or another extension, changing the link to
avoid Google tracking?
That's definitely possible. I'll check it out.
Le septidi 17 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Joel Rees a écrit :
> > The firs drawback is that it would be incompatible with GPL code and
> > libraries, and even possibly LGPL. That means libraries made using that
> > license can not be used from GPL code or with GPL libraries. Basically,
> > there is logica
On Fri 13 Nov 2015 at 14:43:39 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> (as an aside: it's bad custom inherited from DOS to name shell scripts
> with an .sh ending. No ending is the right thing here).
So these were all DOS scripts once, were they?
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1248 Apr 21 2014 /etc/init.d/b
On Qui, 12 Nov 2015, Safwat wrote:
I am running NoScript + Iceweasel, and I observed something weird.
Consider a Google search result which has this "a href" value:
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hello_(Adele_song)&sa=U&ved=0CCsQFjAIahUKEwjPuq3H34vJAhWDWhQKHW7eCbA&usg
A couple of days ago I installed Debian 8 to my Apple Macbook Air (mid
2012). There's no OS X anymore: the only thing left is the small EFI
partition; otherwise it's all just Debian. And I'm happy!
But Thunderbolt port with VGA monitor adapter is not working, and it
would be nice to have that as w
(a) the result of the command "ls -l /home/user/bin/script1.sh"
-rwx-- 1 user000 user000 936 Dec 5 2014 script1.sh
my mistake sorry :-/
script1.sh checks (using apt-get update && apt-get upgrade) if there're
(or not) any updates availables showing me only the total number of
package
On Friday 13 November 2015 08:50:25 Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> How can I execute a script inside a script?
>
> I putted inside /home/user/.bashrc a line like this:
>
> /home/user/bin/script1.sh
>
> but the script does not run...
>
> any idea?
>
Actually chmod +x script1.sh
> thanks for he
On Friday 13 November 2015 08:50:25 Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> How can I execute a script inside a script?
>
> I putted inside /home/user/.bashrc a line like this:
>
> /home/user/bin/script1.sh
>
> but the script does not run...
>
> any idea?
>
chmod +x?
> thanks for help! :-)
>
> Pol
C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:50:25PM +0100, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> How can I execute a script inside a script?
>
> I putted inside /home/user/.bashrc a line like this:
>
> /home/user/bin/script1.sh
>
> but the script does not run...
>
>
Hi all,
I've got a DVB-S2 PCI-Express tv card ("Tevii S472", http://tevii.com/P
roducts_S472_1.asp) with Debian testing, but I'm not able to get it
work.
On TeVii's webpage there is a linux driver availible (http://tevii.com/
Support.asp), but if I try to compile the driver, it says that my
kernel
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:50:25PM +0100, Pol Hallen wrote:
Hi all :-)
How can I execute a script inside a script?
I putted inside /home/user/.bashrc a line like this:
/home/user/bin/script1.sh
but the script does not run...
What is your evidence for the statement that it "does not run"? A
I prefer a straight razor. I have been letting blood to help people live
better lives. I have been doing this for decades and I know what I am doing, I
am a member of the barbers' union. I have had people suggest that I use this
gadget or that because it makes a better cut, the scares look ni
Hi all :-)
How can I execute a script inside a script?
I putted inside /home/user/.bashrc a line like this:
/home/user/bin/script1.sh
but the script does not run...
any idea?
thanks for help! :-)
Pol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:46:23PM +0200, Safwat wrote:
> I am running NoScript + Iceweasel, and I observed something weird.
> Consider a Google search result which has this "a href" value:
>
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://en.wikipedia.org/wik
Hi Frank and thanks for your reply,
I think i had read a similar suggestion on the net, but mountpoints
are not called usbX in my case. They are called userid/keylabel
(e.g: /media/baldyeti/my4GBkey). These are created (and deleted)
dynamically and have no corresponding line in fstab.
Anyway pro
On Fri 13 Nov 2015 at 14:30:11 +0400, Dwijesh Gajadur wrote:
> Okay I will install a display manager. But will I need to configure i3 each
> time I log in ?? Because this what is happening now. Each time the system
> starts, I have to reconfigure i3. Will the display manger solve this
> problem?
Okay I will install a display manager. But will I need to configure i3 each
time I log in ?? Because this what is happening now. Each time the system
starts, I have to reconfigure i3. Will the display manger solve this
problem?
With Kind regards,
Dwijesh
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Alberto
Brian writes:
> Indeed it is not! What is the correct term for xdm?
"Display manager", according to the descriptions.
--
Alberto
On Fri 13 Nov 2015 at 10:47:05 +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:12:39AM CET, Brian said:
> > On Fri 13 Nov 2015 at 11:00:36 +0400, Dwijesh Gajadur wrote:
> >
> > > Hello guys. Now I am facing another problem. Each time the system starts I
> > > am getting the console and I
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:12:39AM CET, Brian said:
> On Fri 13 Nov 2015 at 11:00:36 +0400, Dwijesh Gajadur wrote:
>
> > Hello guys. Now I am facing another problem. Each time the system starts I
> > am getting the console and I have to type 'startx' each time in order to
> > launch i3. What can
On Fri 13 Nov 2015 at 15:33:54 +0800, lina wrote:
> or which package can be used to convert to other format.
>
> I tried the imagemagick,
>
> $ convert a.cvx a.jpeg
> convert: no decode delegate for this image format `CVX' @
> error/constitute.c/ReadImage/501.
Conversion means reading the file.
On Fri 13 Nov 2015 at 11:00:36 +0400, Dwijesh Gajadur wrote:
> Hello guys. Now I am facing another problem. Each time the system starts I
> am getting the console and I have to type 'startx' each time in order to
> launch i3. What can I do to automatically launch i3 whenever the system
> starts wi
Hi!
Had the same problem with DebianEdu Jessie and found mountpount
/media/usb0 defined in /etc/fstab. Deleting the line resulted in
mounting usb-sticks in /media/[username] with appropriate rights.
readU
frank
Am 12.11.2015 um 16:37 schrieb baldyeti:
Hello, under wheezy i had no problem mo
51 matches
Mail list logo
