Woops. Corrections below:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> (Ben saw this, anyway. 8-p
>
> Sorry. Wandering back and forth between Ubuntu and Debian, I sometimes
> forget that debian treats e-mail as e-mail, where Ubuntu does the
> convenient thing.)
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:
Hi, Joel.
Just to clear up a point of confusion (mine) -- when you say you got
those debs (brscan4, etc.) from the repos, do you mean Debian
repositories? I don't see anything like that there.
If you're referring to Ubuntu repos, then that's another matter. I can't
(won't) use those with a D
(Ben saw this, anyway. 8-p
Sorry. Wandering back and forth between Ubuntu and Debian, I sometimes
forget that debian treats e-mail as e-mail, where Ubuntu does the
convenient thing.)
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 02/01/17 13:38, Joel Rees wrote:
>>
>> I got a Bro
On 01/02/2017 07:16 PM, Brian wrote:
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 09:38:24 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian packages
from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the scanner
still isn't being found.
Any progress on this? Which device is
On 01/02/2017 06:50 PM, Brian wrote:
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 10:55:06 -0500, Jape Person wrote:
In the end, voting with my dollars accomplished nothing for the FOSS
community, because I simply couldn't find a functional equivalent that was
free all the way. After a while I just got tired of the r
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 09:38:24 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> I got a Brother printer to work by installing both the debian packages
> from the repos and the deb from Brother's website, but the scanner
> still isn't being found.
Any progress on this? Which device is it?
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 10:55:06 -0500, Jape Person wrote:
> In the end, voting with my dollars accomplished nothing for the FOSS
> community, because I simply couldn't find a functional equivalent that was
> free all the way. After a while I just got tired of the research and bought
> something tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 08:32:33AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 01 Jan 2017 at 13:15:11 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 05:14:50PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
Yeah, sorry. I was set off by this...
> > > Auto-selecti
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 12:00:21PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 01 January 2017 11:52:20 Xen wrote:
> > Lisi Reisz schreef op 31-12-2016 10:30:
> > > Which make me bad at writing?
> > >
> > > Lisi
> >
> > Refusing to write good documentation on purpose.
>
> "%(&_++**!&
I've often thought
Michael Luecke wrote on 01/01/2017 10:29 AM:
> Maybe you could try this to find out if there is some process blocking
> the sound device:
>
> $ fuser -v /dev/snd/* /dev/dsp*
Thank you very much for that suggestion. I'll try it when I next reboot that
machine (probably sometime in the next coupl
David Wright wrote on 01/02/17 15:41:
> On Sun 01 Jan 2017 at 12:39:26 (+0100), Xen wrote:
>> rhkra...@gmail.com schreef op 31-12-2016 15:12:
>>
>>> But, info pages could work.
>>
>> Yes, let's propose that. They are just impossible to navigate if you
>> are not an insider.
>
> I don't know what a
On Monday, January 02, 2017 12:12:53 PM David Wright wrote:
> BTW glad you got your photo frame working OK (in another thread).
Thanks!
> I thought it might work that way. But back in this thread, note
> how they roll on and on. We are still posting under the subject
> line "Do have programs have
On Monday, January 02, 2017 12:01:33 PM David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 11:19:21 (-0500), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, January 02, 2017 09:41:07 AM David Wright wrote:
> > > I have no problem navigating them. I usually consult them with the
> > > function
> > >
> > > $ info
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 11:28:49 (-0500), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 02, 2017 09:52:14 AM David Wright wrote:
> > Have you actually looked?
> >
> > $ man ls | wc -l
> > 223
> > $ info --output=/dev/stdout --subnodes ls | wc -l
> > 853
> > $
>
> I think, for a fairer comparison,
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 11:19:21 (-0500), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 02, 2017 09:41:07 AM David Wright wrote:
> > I have no problem navigating them. I usually consult them with the function
> >
> > $ info --output=/dev/stdout --subnodes "$1" | less
> >
> > which works well with
This appears to be a never ending thread. ;-)
I started it, an, for the record, I'm good (I've got a satisfactory answer--it
seems I can put photos in subdirectories and the photo frame will work its way
through the subdirectories).
But, if you (all) are having fun, carry on ;-)
On Monday,
On Monday, January 02, 2017 09:52:14 AM David Wright wrote:
> Have you actually looked?
>
> $ man ls | wc -l
> 223
> $ info --output=/dev/stdout --subnodes ls | wc -l
> 853
> $
I think, for a fairer comparison, you should specify ls in the info command.
Then I get:
rhk@s19:~$ info ls --output=
On Monday, January 02, 2017 09:41:07 AM David Wright wrote:
> I have no problem navigating them. I usually consult them with the function
>
> $ info --output=/dev/stdout --subnodes "$1" | less
>
> which works well with PageUp/Dn.
>
Nice, thanks!
It seems that to get info for a specific command
On 01/02/2017 07:25 AM, Brian wrote:
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 02:05:47 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 02 January 2017 00:51:11 Jape Person wrote:
On 01/01/2017 09:29 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
For a far less secure way than I do it.
For a far less secure way than you do what? Scanning? Yo
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 06:53:24 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 12/28/2016 10:09 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >On 12/28/2016 4:53 PM, Brian wrote:
> >>On Wed 28 Dec 2016 at 04:48:41 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>
> >>>There is a separate issue with default font sizes that I've
> >>>noticed bef
Le tridi 13 nivôse, an CCXXV, Jude DaShiell a écrit :
> msdos 6.22 which was fat16 had a limit of 112 files in top level directory.
> Once I tried putting more than that on a floppy disk and couldn't figure why
> no more would fit until I found this out. I don't know if the limit got
> expanded fo
msdos 6.22 which was fat16 had a limit of 112 files in top level
directory. Once I tried putting more than that on a floppy disk and
couldn't figure why no more would fit until I found this out. I don't
know if the limit got expanded for fat32 and msdos 7 but since Microsoft
has been devoted
On Sun 01 Jan 2017 at 20:00:56 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 January 2017 14:46:30 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > I cannot recall ever seeing a more complete information about
> > > anything I ever looked up, telling me something that wasn't in the
On Sun 01 Jan 2017 at 12:39:26 (+0100), Xen wrote:
> rhkra...@gmail.com schreef op 31-12-2016 15:12:
>
> >But, info pages could work.
>
> Yes, let's propose that. They are just impossible to navigate if you
> are not an insider.
I don't know what an "insider" is.
I have no problem navigating th
On Sun 01 Jan 2017 at 13:15:11 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 05:14:50PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 31 Dec 2016 at 10:35:02 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Calculemus, as Leibnitz said. A bit of experimental informatics:
>
> Mpfh. Seems I
On 01/02/2017 07:43 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2017-01-02, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'll not pursue the installation of thinkfan as I see no benefit
and do see the possibility of breaking something. I'll continue
to investigate the various display and logging apps available.
Please note that to us se
On Monday 02 January 2017 12:43:15 Curt wrote:
> On 2017-01-02, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I'll not pursue the installation of thinkfan as I see no benefit
> > and do see the possibility of breaking something. I'll continue
> > to investigate the various display and logging apps available.
>
> Plea
On 12/28/2016 10:09 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 12/28/2016 4:53 PM, Brian wrote:
On Wed 28 Dec 2016 at 04:48:41 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
There is a separate issue with default font sizes that I've
noticed before,
but am now motivated to address. Default fonts are annoyingly
small. I know
On 2017-01-02, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I'll not pursue the installation of thinkfan as I see no benefit
> and do see the possibility of breaking something. I'll continue
> to investigate the various display and logging apps available.
Please note that to us serious man page writers the differ
On Mon 02 Jan 2017 at 02:05:47 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2017 00:51:11 Jape Person wrote:
>
> > On 01/01/2017 09:29 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > For a far less secure way than I do it.
> >
> > For a far less secure way than you do what? Scanning? You're stating
> >
30 matches
Mail list logo