On 26/01/19 03:06 AM, Celejar wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:24:56 -0800
"James H. H. Lampert" wrote:
Fellow List members:
Would anybody care to voice an opinion on USB external hard drives in
the 2 terabyte size range, for automated backup purposes?
We've been looking at the Seagate "Expansi
On 06/02/2019 03.17, ghe wrote:
On 2/5/19 9:19 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Have you tried replacing "-" with \45 yet? That's the ascii equivalent
for "-'.
Excellent idea. But:
root@sbox:~# systemctl unmask \45.mount
Unit 45.mount does not exist, proceeding anyway.
(Same with quotes.)
You mi
On Tuesday, February 05, 2019 08:21:16 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> The sudoers(5) man page is ridiculously complex, as is the format of
> the /etc/sudoers file. For 99% of Debian users, it's also completely
> unnecessary to know it. Just make sure your primary user account is in
> the sudo group, a
On Tuesday 05 February 2019 14:03:15 Curt wrote:
> On 2019-02-05, Elmo wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:34:49 +0100
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
> >>
> >>> But it would be so easy to comply with GDPR: rotate logs regularly
> >>
> >> I'
On Tuesday 05 February 2019 09:41:30 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:32:01AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 February 2019 08:42:01 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:58:11AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > http://w
* From: Michael Lange
On 5/02/19 1:55 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
> I've just started getting a bunch of warnings when I start gvim from the
> commandline (as I often do):
>
> ** (gvim:31818): WARNING **: AT-SPI: Could not obtain desktop path or name
> ** (gvim:31818): WARNING **: atk-bridge: get_device_events_reply:
> u
On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 20:32 +, James Allsopp wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm having lots of problems getting this usb wireless dongle (Edimax)
> to pick up and connect to a wireless network. I'm not sure if there's
> a config from an older wireless getting in the way. The hardware for
> that isn't installe
Hi,
On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 13:42:41 -0800
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> Any ideas about this?
>
> root@imager:/etc/apt# apt-get install aptitude
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean
Any ideas about this?
root@imager:/etc/apt# apt-get install aptitude
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
On 2/5/19 2:05 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> I still think that that massive effort might have been better spent
>> fixing init. Handling threads, tightening some methods and regulations,
>> tidying up init.d and its buds, [...]
>
> Start here: https://jdebp.eu/FGA/system-5-rc-problems.html
Yup. T
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 02:00:12PM -0700, ghe wrote:
> I still think that that massive effort might have been better spent
> fixing init. Handling threads, tightening some methods and regulations,
> tidying up init.d and its buds, [...]
Start here: https://jdebp.eu/FGA/system-5-rc-problems.html
On 2/5/19 12:01 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>>From man systemctl:
>
>mask NAME...
>Mask one or more units, as specified on the command line. This will
>link these unit files to /dev/null, making it impossible to start
>them. This is a stronger version of d
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> I'd guess the same. But... now it gets interesting: blocked by whom?
> China? North Korea?
Yes just tried
whois wvsto.com
and accessible from here Europe.
I don't think one would block this site
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone knew if there was a plan to package
ModSecurity-apache for v3 for modsecurity? This would be presumably
be a replacement for libapache2-mod-security2, which is based on
modsecurity v2.
https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity-apache
There is libmodsecurity3 and lib
Hi,
I'm having lots of problems getting this usb wireless dongle (Edimax) to
pick up and connect to a wireless network. I'm not sure if there's a config
from an older wireless getting in the way. The hardware for that isn't
installed anymore.
I'm running network manager in KDE
It's detected by l
On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 19:03:15 -, Curt wrote:
> On 2019-02-05, Elmo wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:34:49 +0100
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
> >>
> >>> But it would be so easy to comply with GDPR: rotate logs regularly
> >>
>
Okay so "-" isn't a systemd unit name. At this point, you might do well
to examine dmesg. Check for fatals errors and warnings and see if any
interesting material turns up.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, ghe wrote:
> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:17:49
> From: ghe
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject:
On 2019-02-05, Elmo wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:34:49 +0100
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
>>
>>> But it would be so easy to comply with GDPR: rotate logs regularly
>>
>> I'm in the UK and can connect to the site in question. Therefore,
>>
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:51:42AM -0700, ghe wrote:
> I'd still like to know what 'mask' means in systemd.
>From man systemctl:
mask NAME...
Mask one or more units, as specified on the command line. This will
link these unit files to /dev/null, making it impossible t
On 2/5/19 9:12 AM, john doe wrote:
> What message
Never mind. It quit complaining. No changes to the scripts. Maybe a
systemd update -- there are several updates to lots of code with testing.
Thanks for the responses.
> In general, ignoring error messages is a recipe for disaster.
You'd think s
On 2/5/2019 7:17 PM, ghe wrote:
> On 2/5/19 9:19 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
>> Have you tried replacing "-" with \45 yet? That's the ascii equivalent
>> for "-'.
>
> Excellent idea. But:
>
> root@sbox:~# systemctl unmask \45.mount
> Unit 45.mount does not exist, proceeding anyway.
>
> (Same with q
On 2/5/19 9:19 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Have you tried replacing "-" with \45 yet? That's the ascii equivalent
> for "-'.
Excellent idea. But:
root@sbox:~# systemctl unmask \45.mount
Unit 45.mount does not exist, proceeding anyway.
(Same with quotes.)
--
Glenn English
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:34:49 +0100
wrote:
Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
But it would be so easy to comply with GDPR: rotate logs regularly
I'm in the UK and can connect to the site in question. Therefore,
it's probably not a GDPR issue.
ditto from Madri
On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 09:54:43 (-0500), Dan Ritter wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 08:21:16 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 08:21:40PM -0700, Thomas D Dial wrote:
> > > > When in doubt about questions like this it often is helpful to consult
> > >
On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 04:42:02 (-0500), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 1/31/19, David Wright wrote:
> >> If for whatever reason you disown that computer, you would just
> >> delete that partition. Your own data you will keep on a USB pen or
> >> microdrive.
> >
> > Something like that. I'd run badb
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 04:06:12PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:34:49 +0100
> wrote:
>
> Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
>
> >But it would be so easy to comply with GDPR: rotate logs regularly
>
> I'm in the UK and can connect to the site in question. Therefore,
> it's probably no
On 2/5/2019 4:43 PM, ghe wrote:
> Buster
>
> A shell script has begun to throw errors I can't seem to get rid of.
> Didn't used to -- it started in the past few days.
>
> I have access to a couple Internet connections: a slow but extremely
> reliable T1 I've been with for years, and a Comcast resid
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:34:49 +0100
wrote:
Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
>But it would be so easy to comply with GDPR: rotate logs regularly
I'm in the UK and can connect to the site in question. Therefore,
it's probably not a GDPR issue.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious
Buster
A shell script has begun to throw errors I can't seem to get rid of.
Didn't used to -- it started in the past few days.
I have access to a couple Internet connections: a slow but extremely
reliable T1 I've been with for years, and a Comcast residential cable
WiFi that's odd, but very fast.
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 06:11:15PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:41:30PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > China? North Korea?
>
> Site owner, of course. (No)thanks to GDPR, it's easier for US site to
> block any visitor from Europe than to comply with leg
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:41:30PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:32:01AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 February 2019 08:42:01 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:58:11AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 08:21:16 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 08:21:40PM -0700, Thomas D Dial wrote:
> > > When in doubt about questions like this it often is helpful to consult
> > > man pages, which often are available on the Web if you don't want
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:32:01AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2019 08:42:01 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:58:11AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > http://www.wvsto.com/Unclaimed-Property/Search-Claim
> >
> > It doesn't even conn
On Tuesday 05 February 2019 08:42:01 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:58:11AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > http://www.wvsto.com/Unclaimed-Property/Search-Claim
>
> It doesn't even connect for me. I lean even more strongly
> towards incompetent web "programmers". S
On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 08:21:16 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 08:21:40PM -0700, Thomas D Dial wrote:
> > When in doubt about questions like this it often is helpful to consult
> > man pages, which often are available on the Web if you don't want to
> > install the necessary
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 08:39:52AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2019 08:13:00 didier gaumet wrote:
[...]
> > - Java and Javascript are different things
>
> I was using javascript as the keyword, and noscript is not installed.
That's what happens when mails cross in-flight
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 08:00:40AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2019 05:55:32 deloptes wrote:
>
> > to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > Too little info to know really say something, but it seems that the
> > > web"masters" mis-typed some javascript: "URL" somewhere.
[...]
> I ch
On Tuesday 05 February 2019 08:13:00 didier gaumet wrote:
> Le 05/02/2019 à 14:00, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> > I checked the about:config, no java related stuff is disabled.
> >
> > Cheers, Gene Heskett
>
> Hello Gene,
>
> - Java and Javascript are different things
I was using javascript as the ke
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:58:11AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> http://www.wvsto.com/Unclaimed-Property/Search-Claim
It doesn't even connect for me. I lean even more strongly
towards incompetent web "programmers". Sigh.
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 08:21:40PM -0700, Thomas D Dial wrote:
> When in doubt about questions like this it often is helpful to consult
> man pages, which often are available on the Web if you don't want to
> install the necessary packages that includes them. In this case, if sudo
> is installed, t
On 2019-02-05, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The address wasn’t understood
>
> Firefox doesn’t know how to open this address, because one of the
> following protocols (javascript) isn’t associated with any program or is
> not allowed in this context.
>
> You might need to install other software to o
Le 05/02/2019 à 14:00, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> I checked the about:config, no java related stuff is disabled.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
Hello Gene,
- Java and Javascript are different things
- If you have installed a Firefox extension like Noscript, it partially
or totally disables scripts for
On Tuesday 05 February 2019 05:55:32 deloptes wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > Too little info to know really say something, but it seems that the
> > web"masters" mis-typed some javascript: "URL" somewhere.
> >
> > If you want anyone to help you debug it, you'd have to disclose the
> > page's
On Tuesday 05 February 2019 04:59:58 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 07:19:26PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > The address wasn’t understood
> >
> > Firefox doesn’t know how to open this address, because one of the
> > following protocols (javascript) isn’t associated with any pr
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:05:30AM +, Paul Sutton wrote:
> Could be interesting as to how to do this depending on where you are,
> different languages (French, German, Arabic), I can see it being easier
> but English, you would, I assume need to compile it for that location.
That's what loca
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:55:32AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > Too little info to know really say something, but it seems that the
> > web"masters" mis-typed some javascript: "URL" somewhere.
> >
> > If you want anyone to help you debug it, you'd have to disclose the
>
On 04/02/2019 13:24, Curt wrote:
> On 2019-02-04, wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:09:33PM -, Curt wrote:
>>> To obviate all ambiguity I'm for calling this rubbish.
>> Isn't that something for locali[sz]ation?
> Depends what you're calling rubbish.
>
I agree, localization is also app
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Too little info to know really say something, but it seems that the
> web"masters" mis-typed some javascript: "URL" somewhere.
>
> If you want anyone to help you debug it, you'd have to disclose the
> page's URL.
I was thinking he has disabled javascript in the browser
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 07:19:26PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The address wasn’t understood
>
> Firefox doesn’t know how to open this address, because one of the
> following protocols (javascript) isn’t associated with any program or is
> not allowed in this context.
>
> You might need to
On 1/31/19, David Wright wrote:
>> If for whatever reason you disown that computer, you would just
>> delete that partition. Your own data you will keep on a USB pen or
>> microdrive.
>
> Something like that. I'd run badblocks over the unencrypted partitions.
>
Why? Do you mean the low level fo
51 matches
Mail list logo
