On April 18, 2019 7:56:06 PM Jimmy Johnson wrote:
On 4/17/19 5:57 AM, songbird wrote:
what? synaptic is a GUI interface to package installation
and removal. why should this block anything? dpkg and apt
do those tasks just fine in a terminal. i only used synaptic
in the past to get a qu
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> songbird wrote:
>
>>what? synaptic is a GUI interface to package installation
>> and removal. why should this block anything? dpkg and apt
>> do those tasks just fine in a terminal. i only used synaptic
>> in the past to get a quick access to lists of files installed
On 4/17/19 5:57 AM, songbird wrote:
what? synaptic is a GUI interface to package installation
and removal. why should this block anything? dpkg and apt
do those tasks just fine in a terminal. i only used synaptic
in the past to get a quick access to lists of files installed
and locations
Dan Purgert writes:
> Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 7:57 AM Michael Stone wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> No, the ULA is the IPv6 equivalent of RFC1918 space--you can use it
>>> internally without central registration by choosing a subnet from
>>> fd00::/8. The space is so much larger th
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, 8:29 AM Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:12:04AM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> >But isn't it irrelevant whether they pick the same prefix or not? Routers
> that
> >respect ULA and RFC1918 shouldn't route any traffic destined to them off
> the
> >logical
On Thu 18 Apr 2019 at 13:36:12 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> The Debian Installer translation status page reports 86 languages (besides
> english):
>
> https://d-i.debian.org/l10n-stats/translation-status.html
As far as the buster installer is concerned:
* 76 languages are supported in th
Le 18/04/2019 à 14:52, Michael Stone a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:37:36PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
A properly generated IPv6 ULA (Unique Local Address) prefix is
unlikely to have collisions.
A randomly selected subnet from 10/8 is also *unlikely* to have
collisions.
The proba
The Debian Installer translation status page reports 86 languages (besides
english):
https://d-i.debian.org/l10n-stats/translation-status.html
Francisco
On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 17:15 +0100, Paul Sutton wrote:
> Hi
> I am looking for some information as to how many languages Debian is
> available i
Hi
I am looking for some information as to how many languages Debian is
available in.
So far the only info I seem to find on this is here
https://www.debian.org/international/index.en.html
is this right, so the list there is the current list.
Thanks
Paul
--
Paul Sutton
http://www.zleap.net
htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 7:57 AM Michael Stone wrote:
>
>>
>> No, the ULA is the IPv6 equivalent of RFC1918 space--you can use it
>> internally without central registration by choosing a subnet from
>> fd00::/8. The space i
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:41:18AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
Alternatively, for internal-only stuff, you can use ULAs. IPv6
The context of our discussion is seamless and collision-free host access
across a VPN, not "internal-only stuff" - unless your directions below
are going to work even when the
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:10:38 -0400
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:00:28AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> >Can you point me to such documenation? You've said that it's a trivial,
> >straightforward change: what, exactly, do I do to start using IPv6?
>
> Find an IPv6 provider. There's
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:00:28AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
Can you point me to such documenation? You've said that it's a trivial,
straightforward change: what, exactly, do I do to start using IPv6?
Find an IPv6 provider. There's not much debian can document about that.
Alternatively, for intern
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:50:17 -0400
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 08:45:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> >You make it sound like it's a trivial, straightforward change. Is it?
>
> Pretty much.
>
> >Will all my applications work correctly over IPv6 without much work?
>
> Unless you
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:12:04AM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
But isn't it irrelevant whether they pick the same prefix or not? Routers that
respect ULA and RFC1918 shouldn't route any traffic destined to them off the
logical subnet. Right?
If it didn't matter, people wouldn't keep looking
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 7:57 AM Michael Stone wrote:
>
> No, the ULA is the IPv6 equivalent of RFC1918 space--you can use it
> internally without central registration by choosing a subnet from
> fd00::/8. The space is so much larger that it's much less likely that
> two sites would pick the same
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 08:06:05PM -, Curt wrote:
On 2019-04-17, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 17/04/2019 à 18:42, Michael Stone a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:38:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:10:56 -0400 Michael Stone
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:57:43AM -04
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:37:36PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 17/04/2019 à 18:42, Michael Stone a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:38:11PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:10:56 -0400 Michael Stone
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:57:43AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
I was ra
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 08:45:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
You make it sound like it's a trivial, straightforward change. Is it?
Pretty much.
Will all my applications work correctly over IPv6 without much work?
Unless you've written something yourself (badly) IPv6 has "just worked"
in debian
19 matches
Mail list logo
