BIG BUNDLES SALE ~FEB~

Hello, Are you looking for stunning and high-quality new office furniture? Maybe you've just moved into a new office or your existing furniture is looking a bit out dated? MSK Installation Ltd has the solution for every office. We have an extensive selection of office furniture - Ranging

Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports.

On 2/22/20 11:45 PM, didier.gau...@gmail.com wrote: Le samedi 22 février 2020 20:30:04 UTC+1, Anastasios Lisgaras a écrit : Yes, all the needed firmwares seem to be present. Explanation of the 'bug' above is here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69921 Nice, thank you for the

Re: Modern automounters and umount

On Saturday 22 February 2020 14:55:45 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 01:22:38PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > [...] > > > I dunno, I've got years on you, and I'm not half done with what I > > need to do yet. > > If everything's done before one leaves, then it gets boring,

Re: High DPI (4K), laptop screen, mode settings, fonts and initramfs-tools

Alex Yuriev composed on 2020-02-22 15:57 (UTC-0500): > I have a 4K laptop in a 12" package with Intel HD520. I have been running > Debian 7 and Debian 8 on it for a while and now I have updated to Debian 10. > I'm sure that you already have an idea of the issue - the console fonts on > 4k are

Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports.

Le samedi 22 février 2020 20:30:04 UTC+1, Anastasios Lisgaras a écrit : [...] > I think all is well, isn't it? > Because the last line worries me a little. > > [14666.667585] ACPI: [Firmware Bug]: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored Yes, all the needed firmwares seem to be present. Explanation of the

High DPI (4K), laptop screen, mode settings, fonts and initramfs-tools

Hi, I have a 4K laptop in a 12" package with Intel HD520. I have been running Debian 7 and Debian 8 on it for a while and now I have updated to Debian 10. I'm sure that you already have an idea of the issue - the console fonts on 4k are tiny, barely usable even at 32px ( does anyone know why

Re: your mail

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 07:44:59PM +0100, René Luijckx wrote: > Hoi, > > Op mijn mobiel ( Android 8.0.0 ) staan volgens de mobiel op de SD-kaart 7 > submappen in de hoofdmap "Muziek". > Als ik deze aankoppel ( bedraad of middels Filezilla ) zie ik echter maar 4 > submappen. > > Is dit een

Re: Modern automounters and umount

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 01:22:38PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: [...] > I dunno, I've got years on you, and I'm not half done with what I need to > do yet. If everything's done before one leaves, then it gets boring, doesn't it? > What I like to find is a government that uses our Constitution,

Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports.

On 2/22/20 8:05 PM, didier.gau...@gmail.com wrote: Le samedi 22 février 2020 11:50:05 UTC+1, Anastasios Lisgaras a écrit : For the hardware already known to the kernel, the later will try to load a firmware when needed. So a search of the 'firmware" word in the kernel logs would show either

Re: Thunderbird reageert soms niet

Op 20-02-2020 om 09:41 schreef Paul van der Vlis: > De problemen bleken uit een van de IMAP accounts te komen. Voor dat de > problemen begonnen had ik daar iets aan gewijzigd, het zo ingesteld dat > berichten ouder dan een jaar automatisch verwijderd konden worden. Toen > de problemen begonnen

Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports.

Le samedi 22 février 2020 11:50:05 UTC+1, Anastasios Lisgaras a écrit : > On 2/19/20 8:14 PM, Anastasios Lisgaras wrote: [...] > > How do I see if my hardware needs > > a particular firmware to work properly? For the hardware already known to the kernel, the later will try to load a firmware

Re: Modern automounters and umount

On Saturday 22 February 2020 12:03:41 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 05:53:07PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > but udisksctl (or however it's called) said "all is well", > > > so it must be either lying -- or someone else quicly

Re: Installing chromium uninstalls runit-init

Quoting Mark Raynsford (2020-02-22 17:38:20) > 'Ello. > > On 2020-02-22T17:32:59 +0100 > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > Maybe you have... held broken packages? > > > > If you use aptitude instead of apt, then you can step through more > > options, including options involving downgrading

Re: Modern automounters and umount

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 05:53:07PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > but udisksctl (or however it's called) said "all is well", > > so it must be either lying -- or someone else quicly mounted > > things after that. > > There is obvious need for a special distro

Re: Installing chromium uninstalls runit-init

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 04:51:01PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote: > On 2020-02-22T17:39:15 +0100 > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > Not all is lost [...] > Thanks! I was about to try that, but it seems that aptitude found an > alternative solution. Firstly, "# aptitude install chromium" said: Great

Re: Modern automounters and umount

Hi, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > but udisksctl (or however it's called) said "all is well", > so it must be either lying -- or someone else quicly mounted > things after that. There is obvious need for a special distro for age-wise challenged people like me. Or at least some online AI which

Re: Installing chromium uninstalls runit-init

On 2020-02-22T17:39:15 +0100 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > Not all is lost... for some reason your system thinks you don't want > to install libgtk-3.0 (I'm assuming you're "on" stable). Just add > that to your install list. If it doesn't conflict with something else, > that might work. > > Cheers

Re: Modern automounters and umount

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 05:39:00PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > Or the /dev/sdb1 is still mounted elsewhere. > > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > twice? (it was just umounted once, [...] > > Own experience with Debian 10.0 Live: > There are two mount points of

Re: Modern automounters and umount

Hi, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Or the /dev/sdb1 is still mounted elsewhere. to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > twice? (it was just umounted once, [...] Own experience with Debian 10.0 Live: There are two mount points of /dev/sda1 reported. The mount point /usr/lib/live/mount/medium can be unmounted.

Re: Installing chromium uninstalls runit-init

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 04:24:01PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote: > On 2020-02-22T17:08:48 +0100 > wrote: > > I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd. > > > > Just for kicks, try > > > > apt install chromium sysvinit-core > > > > If that works, you'd perhaps want to

Re: Installing chromium uninstalls runit-init

'Ello. On 2020-02-22T17:32:59 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Maybe you have... held broken packages? > > If you use aptitude instead of apt, then you can step through more > options, including options involving downgrading (which is unsupported > by Debian, but since your system is already

Re: Installing chromium uninstalls runit-init

Hi Mark, Quoting Mark Raynsford (2020-02-22 17:24:01) > On 2020-02-22T17:08:48 +0100 > wrote: > > I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd. > > > > Just for kicks, try > > > > apt install chromium sysvinit-core > > > > If that works, you'd perhaps want to adapt your

Re: Installing chromium uninstalls runit-init

On 2020-02-22T17:08:48 +0100 wrote: > I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd. > > Just for kicks, try > > apt install chromium sysvinit-core > > If that works, you'd perhaps want to adapt your apt-preferences > (either pushing sysvinit-core or lowering systemd). >

Re: Installing chromium uninstalls runit-init

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 04:02:16PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote: > Hello! > > Attempting to install chromium results in the following: > > # apt install chromium I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd. Just for kicks, try apt install chromium sysvinit-core If that

Re: Modern automounters and umount

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 09:29:51AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > So either "udisksctl" is lying or something else is happening > > behind the scenes (e.g. an over-eager automounter remounting > > the file system again). > > Or the /dev/sdb1 is still mounted elsewhere. twice? (it was just

Installing chromium uninstalls runit-init

Hello! Attempting to install chromium results in the following: # apt install chromium Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: fgetty getty-run Use 'sudo apt

Re: Unable to use Buster as an nfs client

On 2020-02-22T10:27:41 -0500 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, February 22, 2020 09:42:32 AM Mark Raynsford wrote: > > It's a new VM, but this actually _was_ the problem, amusingly. I had > > the following in the bhyve device.map: > > I sometimes get too curious, but is bhyve a typo, or

Re: Unable to use Buster as an nfs client

On Saturday, February 22, 2020 09:42:32 AM Mark Raynsford wrote: > It's a new VM, but this actually _was_ the problem, amusingly. I had > the following in the bhyve device.map: I sometimes get too curious, but is bhyve a typo, or something real? (I tried locate on my system, didn't find

System Error: Standard Service Notice!!!

This message is from a trust sender to debian-user-french@lists.debian.org You have not move to standard service on debian-user-french@lists.debian.org This may cause unable to login tomorrow SOLVE SYSTEM ISSUE

Re: Unable to use Buster as an nfs client

I've discovered what the problem was... On 2020-02-22T17:39:05 +0300 Reco wrote: > > A leftover from an old installation maybe? It's a new VM, but this actually _was_ the problem, amusingly. I had the following in the bhyve device.map: (hd0) /dev/zvol/storage/vm/peppermint/disk1 (cd0)

Re: Unable to use Buster as an nfs client

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 02:03:55PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote: > On 2020-02-22T16:44:18 +0300 > Reco wrote: > > > > And yet it is a case of running a wrong kernel. > > You see, buster's kernel currently has version 4.19.0-8, but yours > > (4.9.0-9) looks like an outdated stretch one. > > And you

Re: Modern automounters and umount

On 2020-02-22, Mark Allums wrote: >> >> But does not require superuser, if udisks2 mounted it on your user's >> behalf in the first place. >> >> > Explain this, then: > > george@martha:~$ udisksctl unmount -b /dev/sdb1 > Unmounted /dev/sdb1. > george@martha:~$ sudo e2fsck -c -c -k -p -f -C 0

Re: Modern automounters and umount

> So either "udisksctl" is lying or something else is happening > behind the scenes (e.g. an over-eager automounter remounting > the file system again). Or the /dev/sdb1 is still mounted elsewhere. Stefan

Re: Unable to use Buster as an nfs client

On 2020-02-22T16:44:18 +0300 Reco wrote: > > And yet it is a case of running a wrong kernel. > You see, buster's kernel currently has version 4.19.0-8, but yours > (4.9.0-9) looks like an outdated stretch one. > And you do have a kernel 4.9, but you don't have the modules for it. > You do have a

Re: Unable to use Buster as an nfs client

Hi. On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:53:38PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote: > I've rebooted the VM several times, so it's definitely not a case of > running the wrong kernel. > > # uname -a > Linux bloodorange.int.arc7.info 4.9.0-9-amd64 And yet it is a case of running a wrong kernel. You see,

Unable to use Buster as an nfs client

Hello! I have a fresh install of Buster installed in a VM. I have the following in /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ buster main deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main deb-src

Re: systemd et swap sur iscsi

didier.gau...@gmail.com a écrit : > > Avertissement: je n'ai jamais créé ou modifié un service Systemd. > > Je pense néanmoins que cet article pourrait t'intéresser au sujet de la > différence entre les clauses "requires" et "after": > >

Re: [iSCSI] NetBSD 9.0 target, Linux Debian initiator

didier.gau...@gmail.com a écrit : > > Avertissement: iscsi j'y connais rien et NetBSD à peine plus: handle with > care ;-) > > peut-être regarder si en jouant avec l'option -l de iscsictl ça améliore les > choses? > la page man: > https://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?iscsictl++NetBSD-6.0 >

Re: Buster - Pas de son - CM M2V / HDA VIA VT82xx - ALC660-VD (realtek ?)

Le samedi 22 février 2020 11:30:03 UTC+1, Hugues MORIN a écrit : [...] > Donc le probleme doit provenir du gestionnaire de bureau > > J'aimerai bien garde Mate sur ce PC car je n'ai pas l'habitude des autres > environnements de bureau, que je l'ai deja configure "a ma sauce", etc... [...] tu

Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports.

On 2/19/20 8:14 PM, Anastasios Lisgaras wrote: On 2/18/20 3:45 PM, Nektarios Katakis wrote: If you check the output of `systemctl status graphical.target` you ll see it s a systemd target and whether it s activated or not. The related file in `/lib/systemd/system/graphical.target` will also

Re: Buster - Pas de son - CM M2V / HDA VIA VT82xx - ALC660-VD (realtek ?)

Bonjour Oui , c'est tout a fait ca , plusieurs version de Debian se sont succede sur ce PC. Il me semble que la 1ere installation etait un Lenny... ca date :) Et comme je debutais, oui, j'ai du faire pas mal de bourde. J'utilise Mate comme environnement de bureau Je viens de realiser que je n'ai

Re: [iSCSI] NetBSD 9.0 target, Linux Debian initiator

Avertissement: iscsi j'y connais rien et NetBSD à peine plus: handle with care ;-) peut-être regarder si en jouant avec l'option -l de iscsictl ça améliore les choses? la page man: https://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?iscsictl++NetBSD-6.0

Re: systemd et swap sur iscsi

Avertissement: je n'ai jamais créé ou modifié un service Systemd. Je pense néanmoins que cet article pourrait t'intéresser au sujet de la différence entre les clauses "requires" et "after": https://serverfault.com/questions/812584/in-systemd-whats-the-difference-between-after-and-requires

Re: Modern automounters and umount

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:47:22PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 21 February 2020 22:58:10 Mark Allums wrote: [...] > > Explain this, then: > > > > george@martha:~$ udisksctl unmount -b /dev/sdb1 > > Unmounted /dev/sdb1. > > george@martha:~$ sudo e2fsck -c -c -k -p -f -C 0 /dev/sdb1 > >

Re: Modern automounters and umount

On 2020-02-22, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >> george@martha:~$ udisksctl unmount -b /dev/sdb1 >> Unmounted /dev/sdb1. >> george@martha:~$ sudo e2fsck -c -c -k -p -f -C 0 /dev/sdb1 >> /dev/sdb1 is in use. >> e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting. >> >> Thnx, >> >> Mark > Is there a user cd'd into it? That