Brad writes:
> Most web forums don't have email capability though. Only discourse
> and groups.io that I know of have it.
Though described as a mailing list manager Sympa has a full Web
interface that might satisfy email-phobic millennials.
https://www.sympa.org/overview/features
--
John
Sur la partie apache je ne peux t'aider. Ton apache ne devrait pas
écouter le 443, le 6443 comme dans mon exemple puis faire un proxy_pas
sur jitsi.systelia.fr: en fonction du hostname appelé. À partir de
là cela devrait être fonctionnel.
Ma conf nginx:
server {
# SSL configuration
Bonjour,
Je tente de lancer une appli graphique depuis chez moi (client)
depuis un serveur distant :
ssh root@ -X xclock
"X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
Error: Can't open display: localhost:10.0"
J'ai vainement cherché, rien ne fonctionne, c'est désespérant,
dont de
tomás writes:
> Please, folks. The subject (mail vs discourse) is thorny enough,
> eliciting strong emotions (myself included).
> Mixing it up with group moderation is going to kill any chance
> of having a productive discussion.
> It is as easy to moderate a mailing list as it is a platform à
NoSpam a écrit :
> Rappelle toi que jitsi utilise le port 443 pour le proxy. Si ton apache
> écoute également sur ce port ... Chez moi nginx écoute le 6443 (MV dont
> le port 443 de l'extérieur est forwardé sur ce port) et fait proxy_pass
> vers le pour jitsi qui utilise également le 80, le
Bonjour
Ma machine à la maison est une "grosse" machine: AMD Ryzen Threadripper
2970WX, carte mère MSI X399 SLI Plus, 64Go de RAM, boitier bien ventilé,
12 Tera de disque dont un Samsung SSD 970 EVO 2TB, deux cartes
graphiques (AMD Radeon 570 + Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti). Noyau Linux 5.5.0,
xorg
Hi,
For the record, I had the exact same problem on a computer running
buster that I don't use very often. For sure, it was working fine even
with timidity installed a few months ago. Many thanks to Andrei for the
'lsof | grep /dev/snd' command that pointed us in the right direction!
Debugging
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 07:32:56AM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2020 13 Apr 03:10 -0500, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > Well, Russ Allbery is one of the most intelligent and even-headed
> > folks out there.
>
> Agreed.
>
> I doubt that Russ reads this list [...]
I wouldn't be so sure.
* On 2020 13 Apr 03:10 -0500, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> Well, Russ Allbery is one of the most intelligent and even-headed
> folks out there.
Agreed.
I doubt that Russ reads this list and may not be aware of the
experiences of us that have dealt with a project that wholesale replaced
working
Rappelle toi que jitsi utilise le port 443 pour le proxy. Si ton apache
écoute également sur ce port ... Chez moi nginx écoute le 6443 (MV dont
le port 443 de l'extérieur est forwardé sur ce port) et fait proxy_pass
vers le pour jitsi qui utilise également le 80, le 443 pour *son*
BERTRAND Joël a écrit :
> NoSpam a écrit :
>> Une idée: tu pourrais faire l'authentification avec apache .htaccess
>> sans toucher à Jitsi.
>
> J'y ai pensé ce matin, mais ça ne me donne pas la souplesse attendue.
> Sinon, pas d'erreur grossière ?
>
À propos d'erreur, en voici une
NoSpam a écrit :
> Une idée: tu pourrais faire l'authentification avec apache .htaccess
> sans toucher à Jitsi.
J'y ai pensé ce matin, mais ça ne me donne pas la souplesse attendue.
Sinon, pas d'erreur grossière ?
__
I'm using this dedicated address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this mail public archive. Public archive administrator
should fix this against automated addresses collectors.
El 13/4/20 a les 13:11, Alex Muntada ha escrit:
> Hola Narcis,
>
>> Coincideix que els
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 09:28:51AM -0500, Anil F Duggirala wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 17:51 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > GeocodeNominatim *
> > geocode_nominatim_get_gnome (void)
> > {
> > GeocodeNominatim *backend;
> >
> > G_LOCK (backend_nominatim_gnome_lock);
> > backend =
On Apr 13, 2020, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 08:23:40AM -, Curt wrote:
> > On 2020-04-13, wrote:
> > >
> > > It is as easy to moderate a mailing list as it is a platform la
> > > discourse. So this isn't a criterion to decide between both.
> >
> > It is, on the
On Apr 13, 2020, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> [...]
> If the interface is as good as google mail in browser, I won't last long;
> maybe 2 minutes.
It makes gmail look good.
--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
On Mon, 13 Apr, 2020 at 12:57:54 +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:16:02AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> > Whether DoH or DNS-over-TLS, you have to trust the DNS server.
>
> Yup. That's why I have my own, and every Debian user can have their own
> too, using
Hola Narcis,
> Coincideix que els ordinadors amb aquest problema foren
> instal·lats de zero amb Debian 9, i després actualitzats a
> Debian 10.
Diria que em va passar quelcom similar després d'actualitzar un
servidor virtual i vaig poder resoldre el problema amb el que
proposen a:
Une idée: tu pourrais faire l'authentification avec apache .htaccess
sans toucher à Jitsi.
J'ai fais différemment: je n'autorise que certaines salle prédéfinies
avec accès sans mot de passe.
Le 13/04/2020 à 11:23, BERTRAND Joël a écrit :
NoSpam a écrit :
Le 11/04/2020 à 14:49, BERTRAND
Le Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:21:15 +0200,
"ajh-valmer" a écrit :
> Je lis dans la presse de ce matin :
> "Après le covid, la France doit faire repartir sa magnifique industrie au
> plus vite".
> Mais elle est ou cette industrie ?
Ah ça je sais :
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 12:57:54PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:16:02AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> Yup. That's why I have my own, and every Debian user can have their own
> too, using only free software.
...and that is why I want the apps on my box to
Hi.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:16:02AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 13 apr 20, 08:47:22, Reco wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 07:46:38PM -0400, Lee wrote:
> >
> > > How many people use a dnssec validating resolver?
> >
> > See above. Besides, DNSSEC is for integrity of
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 11:05:05 +0200
wrote:
Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
>On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 09:56:24AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
>> You can close threads, so no further messages can be added (stops
>> hi-jacking, drift, etc.)
>I don't see why mailing list software (technically) can't offer
Hi Keith,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:45:33PM +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> I might give it a try - but my history with fora that are
> available in browser is that I forget to go look at what is
> happening; even when I ask a question. At least with email, I get
> a prompt to look at un-read
NoSpam a écrit :
>
> Le 11/04/2020 à 14:49, BERTRAND Joël a écrit :
>> Bonjour à tous,
>>
>> J'essaie d'installer jitsi sur l'un de mes serveurs et je sèche. J'ai
>> besoin d'une authentification (je ne veux pas que n'importe qui puisse
>> faire n'importe quoi sur un serveur accessible
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 09:56:24AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 10:32:55 +0200
> wrote:
>
> Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
>
> >This one is surprising to me. Why should community moderation be
> >easier for discourse?
>
> You can close threads, so no further messages can be added
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 10:32:55 +0200
wrote:
Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
>This one is surprising to me. Why should community moderation be
>easier for discourse?
You can close threads, so no further messages can be added (stops
hi-jacking, drift, etc.) Can split message(s) off to start new topic
On 2020-04-13, wrote:
>
>> Why are you doing this?
>> I have two motivations. First, is moderation. Discourse has built in
>> tools to allow community moderation on a much better scale than our email
>> lists.
>
> This one is surprising to me. Why should community moderation be
> easier for
On Lu, 13 apr 20, 10:32:55, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 08:23:40AM -, Curt wrote:
> > On 2020-04-13, wrote:
> > >
> > > It is as easy to moderate a mailing list as it is a platform la
> > > discourse. So this isn't a criterion to decide between both.
> >
> > It is, on
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 08:23:40AM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-04-13, wrote:
> >
> > It is as easy to moderate a mailing list as it is a platform la
> > discourse. So this isn't a criterion to decide between both.
>
> It is, on the contrary, the *primary* criterion for the proposed change
> as
On 2020-04-13, wrote:
>
> It is as easy to moderate a mailing list as it is a platform la
> discourse. So this isn't a criterion to decide between both.
It is, on the contrary, the *primary* criterion for the proposed change
as given by the primary proponent of the change:
Why are you doing
On Lu, 13 apr 20, 10:09:40, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:24:04AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > For those who are not following the discussion on -project here are two,
> > from my point of view, excelent messages [...]
>
> >
On Lu, 13 apr 20, 08:47:22, Reco wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 07:46:38PM -0400, Lee wrote:
>
> > How many people use a dnssec validating resolver?
>
> See above. Besides, DNSSEC is for integrity of zones, not privacy.
> You need DNS-over-TLS if you need last one.
>
>
> > At least
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:24:04AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> For those who are not following the discussion on -project here are two,
> from my point of view, excelent messages [...]
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2020/04/msg00103.html
>
>
On Du, 12 apr 20, 11:45:02, Reco wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> [1] came to my attention today. To quote relevant parts:
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2020/04/msg00074.html
For those who are not following the discussion on -project here are two,
from my point of view, excelent
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 12:36:15AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 12:47:52 -0700
> Ihor Antonov wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, April 12, 2020 12:39:43 PM PDT John Hasler wrote:
[...]
> > > "Ease of moderation" is *not* a plus.
> >
> > +1
> > Observing how zealots have moderated Norbert
On Du, 12 apr 20, 10:55:48, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> I've been hearing/reading this old saw about "less technical users" for
> well over two decades, and not just in Linux land but amateur radio as
> well, and it really touches a nerve of mine. How are less technical
> users ever going to
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 07:46:38PM -0400, Lee wrote:
[...]
> Mozilla claims it's a privacy issue:
> https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-dns-over-https
> Benefits
Yes, sure [1], but *not in each and every friggin' application*.
It'd be OK for the local DNS caching resolver to forward
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
