Re: 1Gbps Ethernet drops to 100Mbps

2020-05-13 Thread Andy Smith
Hi Nazar, On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:58:16PM +0200, Nazar Zhuk wrote: > I have a 1Gbps network port that correctly connects as 1Gbps full duplex on > boot, then drops to 100Mbps 4 seconds later. Negotiation is failing and that is required for 1Gbit, so I would start by ruling out the device that

Re: cleanly getting rid of manually installed transitional packages due to rename

2020-05-13 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 13 mai 20, 10:47:32, David Wright wrote: > > https://wiki.debian.org/RenamingPackages > > I think I understand how that's expected to work now. Checking on two > top-level packages I have removed (cryptsetup/pdftk), I notice that > though they are in Sections admin/text in the Packages

Debian Denyhost Bogue 128

2020-05-13 Thread G2PC
Bonjour, Quelqu'un pour tester la version Denyhost branche bug_128 ? Il s'agirait de vérifier la nouvelle fonctionnalité, sur un serveur VPS / Dédié, que votre IP publique ( box à la maison ), soit bien ajoutée dans le fichier hosts.allow Merci de vos retours. Bogue :

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread David Wright
On Wed 13 May 2020 at 11:24:54 (-0700), Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2020 00:37:52 +0200 Andrea Borgia wrote: > > Il 13/05/20 00:21, Patrick Bartek ha scritto: > > > > > I can't find anything definitive on this question. Some say, 100MB is > > > fine; others 215 or 550 is a safe

Re: Re: Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread Lyndon Brown
> nearer: > > https://sources.debian.org/src/etm/3.2.30-1/etmTk/etm.1/#L154 > " \%\- get haircut @s 24 @r d 14 @o r" > > https://sources.debian.org/src/etm/3.2.301/etmTk/etm.appdata.xml/#L17 > "- get haircut @s 24 @r d i 14 @o r >" > >

Re: Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, nearer: https://sources.debian.org/src/etm/3.2.30-1/etmTk/etm.1/#L154 " \%\- get haircut @s 24 @r d 14 @o r" https://sources.debian.org/src/etm/3.2.30-1/etmTk/etm.appdata.xml/#L17 "- get haircut @s 24 @r d i 14 @o r "

Re: Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i wrote: > > https://www.fpml.org/spec/fpml-5-9-3-wd-3/html/recordkeeping/schemaDocumentation/schemas/fpml-repo-5-9_xsd/complexTypes/InitialMarginCalculation/haircut.html > > (I found no evidence that the term is usual in typesetting.) David Wright wrote: > I think they refers to investors

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread David Wright
On Wed 13 May 2020 at 11:37:31 (-0700), Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2020 07:38:00 +0200 Sven Hartge wrote: > > Rick Thomas wrote: > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020, at 3:37 PM, Andrea Borgia wrote: > > >> Il 13/05/20 00:21, Patrick Bartek ha scritto: > > > > >> > I can't find anything

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread Sven Hartge
Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2020 07:38:00 +0200 Sven Hartge wrote: >> Also Firmware/BIOS update are often put onto there nowadays to be >> installed on next reboot. > Aren't such updates stored still in /boot? Or has that changed with > efi? For my Dell Precision 7520 I can either

1Gbps Ethernet drops to 100Mbps

2020-05-13 Thread Nazar Zhuk
Hi all, I have a 1Gbps network port that correctly connects as 1Gbps full duplex on boot, then drops to 100Mbps 4 seconds later. Forcing 1Gbps full duplex with ethtool works fine. Tested to make sure the actual speed is over 100Mbps. I am trying to determine what causes the drop to 100Mbps

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Wed, 13 May 2020 07:38:00 +0200 Sven Hartge wrote: > Rick Thomas wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2020, at 3:37 PM, Andrea Borgia wrote: > >> Il 13/05/20 00:21, Patrick Bartek ha scritto: > > >> > I can't find anything definitive on this question. Some say, 100MB > >> > is fine; others 215

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Wed, 13 May 2020 09:16:33 +0200 Andrea Borgia wrote: > Update:older laptop had 100MB, the current one apparently has more than > 500MB but I am not sure whether that holds the recovery image as well or > not. > > Anyhow, the caveat for multiple copies is valid for /boot, where kernels >

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Tue, 12 May 2020 17:17:29 -0700 "Rick Thomas" wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2020, at 3:37 PM, Andrea Borgia wrote: > > Il 13/05/20 00:21, Patrick Bartek ha scritto: > > > I can't find anything definitive on this question. Some say, 100MB is > > > fine; others 215 or 550 is a safe choice. It

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Wed, 13 May 2020 00:37:52 +0200 Andrea Borgia wrote: > Il 13/05/20 00:21, Patrick Bartek ha scritto: > > > > I can't find anything definitive on this question. Some say, 100MB is > > fine; others 215 or 550 is a safe choice. It all seems to be just > > opinions. > > I had the same

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Wed, 13 May 2020 12:33:32 + Steve McIntyre wrote: > nemomm...@gmail.com wrote: > > > >I can't find anything definitive on this question. Some say, 100MB is > >fine; others 215 or 550 is a safe choice. It all seems to be just > >opinions. > > > >Anyone know for sure? I hate having to

Re: Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread jnqnfe
I'm also seeing this, yesterday and today on unstable/sid. It does not happen on every use of `sudo aptitude update`, only some.

Re: R performance

2020-05-13 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Wed, May 13, 2020, 3:02 AM Mark Fletcher wrote: > . So the question has become academic but I would like to get some > sort of explanation so I can adjust for the future. > It used to be the case that AMD caches performed vastly differently than Intel. That will especially be so as you

Re: cleanly getting rid of manually installed transitional packages due to rename

2020-05-13 Thread David Wright
On Tue 12 May 2020 at 12:12:33 (+0200), Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2020-05-07 18:24:59 -0500, David Wright wrote: > > On Wed 06 May 2020 at 12:31:35 (+0200), Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > I use unstable. I doubt that packages get renamed in stable > > > (except between full upgrades, where the

Re: package python3-chardet breaks package python-chardet

2020-05-13 Thread Marco Möller
On 13.05.20 16:23, Marco Möller wrote: As package python3-chardet defines to break package python-chardet, I cannot upgrade python3-chardet because I am still very satisfied using software "cherrytree" which depends on python-chardet. My finding is, that I would have to remove python-chardet,

Re: Versões antigas do debian

2020-05-13 Thread Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana
Olá, Na verdade você não precisa usar uma versão antiga do Debian. Vc pode usar a versão atual, mas com um interface gráfica bem mais leve. Abraços, Em 13/05/2020 08:33, China escreveu: > Bom dia. > > Tenho um netbook Asus 1201T que estava com defeito jogado numa gaveta. > Consegui consertar,

package python3-chardet breaks package python-chardet

2020-05-13 Thread Marco Möller
As package python3-chardet defines to break package python-chardet, I cannot upgrade python3-chardet because I am still very satisfied using software "cherrytree" which depends on python-chardet. My finding is, that I would have to remove python-chardet, which subsequently would also remove

Re: Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread David Wright
On Wed 13 May 2020 at 09:55:03 (+0200), Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Darac Marjal wrote: > > as far as I can tell > > (https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=get\s%2Bhaircut=0) the > > phrase "get haircut" isn't anywhere in Debian. > > Google "xml get haircut" yields > >

Re: Versões antigas do debian

2020-05-13 Thread China
É um AMD Athlon MV40. Uma linha só pra netbook. Pelo que percebi, tive problema com o a placa de vídeo ATI Radeon 3200 mas o maior problema foi o consumo de recurso da CPU. Eu usei essa máquina de 2011 a 2015 com debian testing, mas dai ela parou. Até 2015 o uso era bom pra e-mail e documentos

Re: Versões antigas do debian

2020-05-13 Thread P. J.
Bom dia Tenta com i3... openbox... awesome e similiares Em 13/05/2020, China escreveu: > Bom dia. > > Tenho um netbook Asus 1201T que estava com defeito jogado numa gaveta. > Consegui consertar, que envolveu a troca do HD. Instalei a versão stable do > debian mas ficou muito ruim mesmo com lxde

Re: Question on Unattended Upgrades

2020-05-13 Thread Marco Möller
On 12.05.20 07:25, Keifer Bly wrote: Is there a way to configure it to automatically restart when a package that needs to be restarted is upgraded? Thx. Restarting might not be needed at all if applying some "live patching" mechanism. It might not be helpful for you, but I thought to mention

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
nemomm...@gmail.com wrote: > >I can't find anything definitive on this question. Some say, 100MB is >fine; others 215 or 550 is a safe choice. It all seems to be just >opinions. > >Anyone know for sure? I hate having to waste hundreds of megs for a >partition that only needs to hold a few megs,

Re: Versões antigas do debian

2020-05-13 Thread Leandro Ramos
Para termos outras sugestões, seria melhor sabermos a configuração da máquina. Qual é o processador? Dê mais detalhes, pois o peso do sistema não é tão diferente nas versões 8, 9 e 10 do Debian. E as mais antigas não tem mais suporte. Em qua, 13 de mai de 2020 08:49, China escreveu: > Bom dia.

Re: Question on Unattended Upgrades

2020-05-13 Thread l0f4r0
Hi, 13 mai 2020 à 06:39 de keifer@gmail.com: > I am not backing this machine up to a physical drive, it is a VPS, so being > hosted in the cloud and all. We are not dealing with databases, but just > pushing traffic between nodes, etc. They strongly advise be running both the > most

Versões antigas do debian

2020-05-13 Thread China
Bom dia. Tenho um netbook Asus 1201T que estava com defeito jogado numa gaveta. Consegui consertar, que envolveu a troca do HD. Instalei a versão stable do debian mas ficou muito ruim mesmo com lxde de inefável gráfica. Além do processador capado tem só 2gb de ram. Então gostaria de instalar uma

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:37:52AM +0200, Andrea Borgia wrote: > Debian uses about 6MB, MS about 26MB, plus a couple of megs for boot. > If space is really tight you might want to stick with 100MB in total. My current desktop PC is an HP Pavilion that came pre-loaded with Windows. I added Debian

Re: R performance

2020-05-13 Thread Reco
Hi. On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:02:20AM +0100, Mark Fletcher wrote: > EC2 used to offer Debian but they don't any more. Debian AMIs do exist on EC2, you just have to search them: https://wiki.debian.org/Cloud/AmazonEC2Image/Buster Reco

Re: Question on Unattended Upgrades

2020-05-13 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 13 May 2020 03:53:36 l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > Hi, > > 13 mai 2020 à 06:39 de keifer@gmail.com: > > I am not backing this machine up to a physical drive, it is a VPS, > > so being hosted in the cloud and all. We are not dealing with > > databases, but just pushing traffic between

Re: R performance

2020-05-13 Thread Mark Fletcher
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:06:52PM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > > You don't mention which distro you are running on the EC2 instance, nor > whether R or the C libraries differ in release levels. Moreover, that EC2 > instance type is AMD-based not Intel. So if not an apples-to-oranges >

Re: Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Darac Marjal wrote: > as far as I can tell > (https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=get\s%2Bhaircut=0) the > phrase "get haircut" isn't anywhere in Debian. Google "xml get haircut" yields

Re: Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread Anders Andersson
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:31 AM Darac Marjal wrote: > > > On 13/05/2020 07:05, Ihor Antonov wrote: > > Today during apt update I got a very strange error message (below) > > Running apt udpate did not seem to reproduce the issue. > > > > Does anyone know what is this? And why does it tell "get

Re: Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread Ihor Antonov
On Wednesday, 13 May 2020 00:30:31 PDT Darac Marjal wrote: > That's an odd one because, as far as I can tell > (https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=get\s%2Bhaircut=0) the > phrase "get haircut" isn't anywhere in Debian. That would imply that > it's in a datafile on your computer. You could try

Re: Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread Darac Marjal
On 13/05/2020 07:05, Ihor Antonov wrote: > Today during apt update I got a very strange error message (below) > Running apt udpate did not seem to reproduce the issue. > > Does anyone know what is this? And why does it tell "get haircut" ? > > > $ sudo apt update

Re: Smallest Usable EFI Partition?

2020-05-13 Thread Andrea Borgia
Update:older laptop had 100MB, the current one apparently has more than 500MB but I am not sure whether that holds the recovery image as well or not. Anyhow, the caveat for multiple copies is valid for /boot, where kernels live. AFAIK, /boot/EFI is fairly constant in space utilization... I have

Re: Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread Anders Andersson
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 8:05 AM Ihor Antonov wrote: > > Today during apt update I got a very strange error message (below) > Running apt udpate did not seem to reproduce the issue. > > Does anyone know what is this? And why does it tell "get haircut" ? > > > $ sudo apt update > [sudo]

Suspicious output during apt update

2020-05-13 Thread Ihor Antonov
Today during apt update I got a very strange error message (below) Running apt udpate did not seem to reproduce the issue. Does anyone know what is this? And why does it tell "get haircut" ? $ sudo apt update