On 2020-05-11 20:11, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On 11/05/2020 08:40, Reco wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:33:59AM +0200, Dmitry Katsubo wrote:
>>
>>> root@debian:~ # systemctl status binfmt-support
>>> * binfmt-support.service - Enable support for additional executable binary
>>> f
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, May 17, 2020 4:48 PM, David Wright
wrote:
> OK, I thought you might list both. I'm not actually sure where output
> goes because I always have MAILTO set, which takes care of it.
Since I don't know what MAILTO is, I suspect I've never had to have it
On 2020-05-11 20:11, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On 11/05/2020 08:40, Reco wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:33:59AM +0200, Dmitry Katsubo wrote:
>>
>>> root@debian:~ # systemctl status binfmt-support
>>> * binfmt-support.service - Enable support for additional executable binary
>>> f
On Sun 17 May 2020 at 13:05:39 (-0600), ghe wrote:
> On Sunday, May 17, 2020 12:03 PM, David Wright
> wrote:
>
> > I always examine my cron with
> >
> > crontab -l
> >
> > rather than just catting some random file.
>
> Here it is, but I see no difference, except the disabled tripwire.
>
> root
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, May 17, 2020 12:03 PM, David Wright
wrote:
> I always examine my cron with
>
> crontab -l
>
> rather than just catting some random file.
>
> Cheers,
> David.
Here it is, but I see no difference, except the disabled tripwire.
root@sbox:~# crontab
On Sun 17 May 2020 at 11:21:11 (-0600), ghe wrote:
> On 5/17/20 10:42 AM, ghe wrote:
> > Buster, Supermicro desktop
> >
> > Cron jobs (some of them) don't show up in root's email.
> >
> > I admin 2 domains -- one on Squeeze, one on Buster. My Squeeze
> > cron results show up fine; Buster's don't.
On 5/17/20 10:42 AM, ghe wrote:
Buster, Supermicro desktop
Cron jobs (some of them) don't show up in root's email.
I admin 2 domains -- one on Squeeze, one on Buster. My Squeeze cron
results show up fine; Buster's don't. I've reinstalled the Buster jobs.
I've copyNpasted them from the Squeeze
On Sunday 17 May 2020 12:51:00 David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 17 May 2020 at 09:34:42 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 17 May 2020 06:25:20 Reco wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 01:04:23PM +0300, aprekates wrote:
> > > > In Buster lsof wont report anything
> > > >
> > > > $ sudo lsof
Hi.
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 11:51:00AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 17 May 2020 at 09:34:42 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 17 May 2020 06:25:20 Reco wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 01:04:23PM +0300, aprekates wrote:
> > > > In Buster lsof wont report anything
> > >
On Sun 17 May 2020 at 09:34:42 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 17 May 2020 06:25:20 Reco wrote:
> > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 01:04:23PM +0300, aprekates wrote:
> > > In Buster lsof wont report anything
> > >
> > > $ sudo lsof
> > > lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse file system /run/user/100
On Sunday 17 May 2020 11:56:51 John Conover wrote:
> I have two Prolific PL2303 devices on a machine. The output of lsusb
> is identical for both, including iSerial of 0, for both.
>
> Is there any way of doing udev SYMLINK+ with these devices?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
TBT John, the best place
I have two Prolific PL2303 devices on a machine. The output of lsusb
is identical for both, including iSerial of 0, for both.
Is there any way of doing udev SYMLINK+ with these devices?
Thanks,
John
--
John Conover, cono...@rahul.net, http://www.johncon.com/
On Sunday 17 May 2020 06:25:20 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 01:04:23PM +0300, aprekates wrote:
> > In Buster lsof wont report anything
> >
> > $ sudo lsof
> > lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse file system /run/user/1000/doc
> > Output information may be incomplete.
>
>
Sven Hartge wrote:
> Temporary solution: downgrade to 2.9 again, hold the package and monitor
> the bug report I linked.
Sorry, the correct bug is
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959236
Unfortunately it has only "normal" severity, "grave" would be better
here, since it not onl
Grzesiek Sójka wrote:
> On 5/17/20 12:34 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Mind doing a "ifup -v bond0" to really see what is called how and where
>> it fails in what way?
> after "ifup -v bond0" I get a larg number of following messages
> (probably 1000?):
> + [ -n ]
> + return 0
> + setup_master
>
On 5/17/20 12:34 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Mind doing a "ifup -v bond0" to really see what is called how and where
it fails in what way?
after "ifup -v bond0" I get a larg number of following messages
(probably 1000?):
+ [ -n ]
+ return 0
+ setup_master
+ add_master
+ [ -f /sys/class/net/bond0
Susmita/Rajib wrote:
I need help with BT card identification in my laptop, enable it and
pair it with a BT enabled loudspeaker.
My daughter, a Graphic Designer, does this so easily with her Doze
laptop. Why should it be a problem with Linux, as all the core device
programs are in assembly and c?
Grzesiek Sójka wrote:
> On 5/17/20 12:13 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> How does your /etc/network/interfaces look like? Usally all the work is
>> done via if-pre-up.d and if-up.d scripts provided by the ifenslave
>> package.
> # cat /etc/network/interfaces
> source-directory /etc/network/interfaces.
On 5/17/20 12:13 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
How does your /etc/network/interfaces look like? Usally all the work is
done via if-pre-up.d and if-up.d scripts provided by the ifenslave
package.
# cat /etc/network/interfaces
source-directory /etc/network/interfaces.d
auto bond0
iface bond0 inet stati
Hi.
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 01:04:23PM +0300, aprekates wrote:
> In Buster lsof wont report anything
>
> $ sudo lsof
> lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse file system /run/user/1000/doc
> Output information may be incomplete.
Most likely this fuse filesystem was not mounted with "all
On 2020-05-17 11:27 +0200, Grzesiek Sójka wrote:
> After upgrading ifenslave from 2.9 to 2.10 i found that there if no
> /sbin/ifenslave binary. To restore network connectivity I had to
> manually downgrade to 2.9. Is it on purpose? If so, then how to
> properly configure link aggregation?
I don
Grzesiek Sójka wrote:
> After upgrading ifenslave from 2.9 to 2.10 i found that there if no
> /sbin/ifenslave binary. To restore network connectivity I had to
> manually downgrade to 2.9. Is it on purpose? If so, then how to
> properly configure link aggregation?
It seems you hit
https://bugs.de
In Buster lsof wont report anything
$ sudo lsof
lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse file system /run/user/1000/doc
Output information may be incomplete.
$ sudo lsof -e /run/user/1000/doc
$
Alexandros
Hi there,
After upgrading ifenslave from 2.9 to 2.10 i found that there if no
/sbin/ifenslave binary. To restore network connectivity I had to
manually downgrade to 2.9. Is it on purpose? If so, then how to properly
configure link aggregation?
Thank for any help in advance
Greg
On Du, 17 mai 20, 10:10:38, deloptes wrote:
> Reco wrote:
>
> > Please elaborate that. I haven't found any way to enable that in Debian
> > 10, yet somehow you did it.
>
> perhaps what is meant here is apt-get from source with unknown gpg key. I
> personally do not see another option. But I also
Reco wrote:
> Please elaborate that. I haven't found any way to enable that in Debian
> 10, yet somehow you did it.
perhaps what is meant here is apt-get from source with unknown gpg key. I
personally do not see another option. But I also do not know how one can
workaround this.
@Gary L. Roach
W
Hi.
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 04:54:30PM -0700, Gary L. Roach wrote:
> 2) The latest annoyance is finding that I can't download and install programs
> because they are not signed.
Please elaborate that. I haven't found any way to enable that in Debian 10, yet
somehow you did it.
Reco
Gary L. Roach wrote:
> 1) Not being able to use Dolphin as root is annoying beyond belief.
> Yes, I know, use sudo. What a pain. I am in and out of root files
> constantly either copying or moving them. I always keep two tabs on my
> bash console, one as root and one as normal user.
Whenever I
if you like risky business:
1) assuming you use sddm:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=193261 (you probably also
may auto-login as root which would be simpler)
2)
https://askubuntu.com/questions/74345/how-do-i-bypass-ignore-the-gpg-signature-checks-of-apt
On 17/5/20 4:30 pm, Frank wrote:
when installing a package with multiple dependencies apt gives an output:
(example: apt install gnome)
apt list --upgradable
gives me (shortened)
qemu-system-x86/testing 1:5.0-4 amd64 [upgradable from: 1:4.2-7]
qemu-utils/testing 1:5.0-4 amd64 [upgradable fr
30 matches
Mail list logo
