Hello,
12 sept. 2020 14:09:14 Dan Ritter :
> John Conover wrote:
>>
>> Does portsentry(1) make any sense in systems with ipv6 connectivity?
>>
> Yes and no. If you want to know that machines are scanning
> ports, yes. If you want to effectively block IPs, no.
Why would it not be able to block ip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sorry not to have sent to the list.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:39 PM, Charles Curley
charlescur...@charlescurley.com wrote:
> According tohttps://docs.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-weather-plugin,
> the weat
Thank you!
(Nothing new below this line.)
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 06:14:33 PM David Christensen wrote:
> On 2020-09-12 09:10, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I'm thinking about putting my backup encrypted files in a LUKS filesystem
> > within a file instead of on a dedicated partition (for
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:26:27 +
ghe2001 wrote:
> I have 2 computers running Debian/xfce4, and the WR widget says "? No
> Data" on both of them.
>
> I've set it to several locations, and WR finds the locations just
> fine. It just can't get the weather data.
According to https://docs.xfce.or
On 2020-09-12 12:14, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:10:48 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking about putting my backup encrypted files in a LUKS
filesystem within a file instead of on a dedicated partition (for a
few reasons).
Why do you want a file system inside a file?
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:32:58
> From: Greg Wooledge
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Installing/launching MATE in a command line environment
> Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:33:17 + (UTC)
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.
On 2020-09-12 09:10, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking about putting my backup encrypted files in a LUKS filesystem within
a file instead of on a dedicated partition (for a few reasons).
I have two questions about that:
* if I don't have that LUKS filesystem "mounted" and open and I wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Debian Buster, apt says everything's up to date
Did xfce4's Weather Report go away?
I have 2 computers running Debian/xfce4, and the WR widget says "? No Data" on
both of them.
I've set it to several locations, and WR finds the locations just fi
Hi there.
On 11/09/2020 01.40, Michael Morgan wrote:
I recently installed Debian 9.13 on my machine. I was planning to use it for
scientific computation so GUI is not necessary. For some reason, I installed
the desktop environment with LXDE desktop during installation. Later I
decided to remove
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 04:28:46PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Some package you are trying to install must either depend on that package
or recommend it. Try installing that package with --no-install-recommends.
The entire purpose of that package is to prevent the installation of
other packages
Some package you are trying to install must either depend on that package
or recommend it. Try installing that package with --no-install-recommends.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Hi, Stefan.
On 12/09/2020 17.30, Stefan Monnier wrote:
APT keeps wanting to install `sse2-support` on my dear Thinkpad X30, but
that machine's CPU does not support SSE2, so the package's installation
always fails.
How can I tell APT that it shouldn't *try* to install `sse2-support`?
I tried to
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> APT keeps wanting to install `sse2-support` on my dear Thinkpad X30, but
> that machine's CPU does not support SSE2, so the package's installation
> always fails.
>
> How can I tell APT that it shouldn't *try* to install `sse2-support`?
>
> I tried to put a "hold" on the
APT keeps wanting to install `sse2-support` on my dear Thinkpad X30, but
that machine's CPU does not support SSE2, so the package's installation
always fails.
How can I tell APT that it shouldn't *try* to install `sse2-support`?
I tried to put a "hold" on the package with
echo "sse2-support"
On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 13:47:04 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 19:19:50 (+0100), mick crane wrote:
> > On 2020-09-12 18:42, Brian wrote:
> > > On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 11:49:18 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > > > On 2020-09-12 10:53, Brian wrote:
> > > > > On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 12:33:
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:10:48 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm thinking about putting my backup encrypted files in a LUKS
> filesystem within a file instead of on a dedicated partition (for a
> few reasons).
Why do you want a file system inside a file? The only reason I can
think of to do tha
On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 19:19:50 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-09-12 18:42, Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 11:49:18 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> >
> > > On 2020-09-12 10:53, Brian wrote:
> > > > On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 12:33:56 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Vi, 11 sep 2
On 9/12/20 12:10 PM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking about putting my backup encrypted files in a LUKS filesystem within
a file instead of on a dedicated partition (for a few reasons).
I have two questions about that:
* if I don't have that LUKS filesystem "mounted" and open and I wr
On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 19:19:50 (+0100), mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-09-12 18:42, Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 11:49:18 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > > On 2020-09-12 10:53, Brian wrote:
> > > > On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 12:33:56 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > > > On Vi, 11 sep 20, 22:47:06,
On 2020-09-12 18:42, Brian wrote:
On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 11:49:18 +0100, mick crane wrote:
On 2020-09-12 10:53, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 12:33:56 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > On Vi, 11 sep 20, 22:47:06, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote:
> > >
> > > I've also been bitten by this. I
On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 11:49:18 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-09-12 10:53, Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 12:33:56 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > > On Vi, 11 sep 20, 22:47:06, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've also been bitten by this. I think it is a UI issue,
Am Samstag, 12. September 2020, 18:10:48 CEST schrieb rhkra...@gmail.com:
Hi,
> I'm thinking about putting my backup encrypted files in a LUKS filesystem
> within a file instead of on a dedicated partition (for a few reasons).
>
> I have two questions about that:
>
>* if I don't have that LU
I'm thinking about putting my backup encrypted files in a LUKS filesystem
within
a file instead of on a dedicated partition (for a few reasons).
I have two questions about that:
* if I don't have that LUKS filesystem "mounted" and open and I write to it,
I assume (or hope) that nothing will
* On 2020 12 Sep 02:06 -0500, Lone Learner wrote:
> POSIX.1-2001 Utilities[1] and POSIX.1-2008 Utilities[2] both list the
> commands "bc" and "ed" to be part of POSIX.
>
> Yet, in a brand new Debian installation (version 10 for example),
> these commands are missing by default:
>
> $ bc
> bash: b
John Conover wrote:
>
> Does portsentry(1) make any sense in systems with ipv6 connectivity?
>
Yes and no. If you want to know that machines are scanning
ports, yes. If you want to effectively block IPs, no.
You can, of course, block well known IPv6 addresses -- I block
Google's DNS resolvers
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 05:18, Felix Miata wrote:
> Greg Wooledge composed on 2020-09-11 11:42 (UTC-0400):
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:35:46 -0500, David Wright wrote:
>
> >> That's the first mention of this phenomenon I recall seeing since I posted
> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2018
BOGAT BREZPLAČEN ANIMACIJSKI PROGRAM
•doma smo ustvarjalni (jesensko slikanje z odtisi listov, peka kostanjev ob ognju,
izdelava spominkov..)•doma smo aktivni (pohod do Energetskih točk, do Ribniške koče,
nočni pohod, jutranja telovadba..) •doma smo zabavni (igra "Zemljo krast",
tw
On 2020-09-12 10:53, Brian wrote:
On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 12:33:56 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Vi, 11 sep 20, 22:47:06, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote:
>
> I've also been bitten by this. I think it is a UI issue, the options
> are ambiguous. Would it be possible to simply change the dialog box
I do this job using aptitude instead apt:
/usr/bin/aptitude search '~i !~M' -F '%p' --disable-columns
Toni Mas
Missatge de Sven Joachim del dia ds., 12 de set.
2020 a les 9:29:
>
> On 2020-09-11 22:03 -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
>
> > Is there any option to have 'dpkg --get-selections' NOT includ
On Sat 12 Sep 2020 at 12:33:56 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 11 sep 20, 22:47:06, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote:
> >
> > I've also been bitten by this. I think it is a UI issue, the options
> > are ambiguous. Would it be possible to simply change the dialog box as
> > follows? --
> >
>
On Vi, 11 sep 20, 10:35:46, David Wright wrote:
>
> I don't use a DE so I can't check. Who owns the X server nowadays
> when running a DM? (With no DM running, ownership changed from root
> to the user some time ago.)
As far as I know it depends on the DM, e.g. with lightdm it's root, at
least o
On Vi, 11 sep 20, 22:47:06, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote:
>
> I've also been bitten by this. I think it is a UI issue, the options
> are ambiguous. Would it be possible to simply change the dialog box as
> follows? --
>
> Debian desktop environments:
> [ ] ... GNOME (default)
> [ ] ... Xf
Hi folks,
I am searching a setting in kmail.
When I try to sign a mail which has an attachement in kmail, a popup appears
and I get warned, that the signing is only partly of the mail, and if I want
to change this.
So I suppose, there is somewhere a setting of this ("sign mails partly" or
"s
On 9/12/20 9:05 AM, Lone Learner wrote:
> POSIX.1-2001 Utilities[1] and POSIX.1-2008 Utilities[2] both list the
> commands "bc" and "ed" to be part of POSIX.
>
> Yet, in a brand new Debian installation (version 10 for example),
> these commands are missing by default:
>
> $ bc
> bash: bc: command
12 sept. 2020 09:06:19 Lone Learner :
> Why does Debian not include these [posix] commands by default?
>
I guess many debian users don't care about these commands, so it would be rude
to impose something wanted by only a part of the users. And there's the case
of tiny embedded scarce systems t
On 2020-09-11 22:03 -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Is there any option to have 'dpkg --get-selections' NOT include
> automatically installed packages?
No, dpkg has no notion of automatically installed packages, that is an
apt concept.
> Otherwise, all packages show as manually installed, including
POSIX.1-2001 Utilities[1] and POSIX.1-2008 Utilities[2] both list the
commands "bc" and "ed" to be part of POSIX.
Yet, in a brand new Debian installation (version 10 for example),
these commands are missing by default:
$ bc
bash: bc: command not found
$ ed
bash: ed: command not found
Why does De
Does portsentry(1) make any sense in systems with ipv6 connectivity?
Thanks,
John
--
John Conover, cono...@rahul.net, http://www.johncon.com/
38 matches
Mail list logo
