Le Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:24:33 +0100,
F a écrit :
> 'lut,
>
>
> > Sur le même PC une partition avec Buster ou le script fonctionne
> > et une autre partition avec Buster ou le script ne fonctionne pas.
Merci tout de même d'avoir essayé. ;-)
> oops, oublies mes sottises de bios alors ;)
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021, 8:48 PM komodo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> last two months when I copy multiple files from USB or SD to HDD after the
> first
> file copying stucks.
>
> I don't know if this is some known bug but it's really annoying.
>
Just a thought. I've had reliability problems with USB keys in
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Reminds me of the saying that the difference between USA and USSR was
> that in USSR the population knew that it was propaganda.
Exactly - this part is absolutely the same.
The difference is in the methods. There it was wellknown, here - not until
internet came out ... or
On 21-03-2021 11:32, komodo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> last two months when I copy multiple files from USB or SD to HDD after the
> first
> file copying stucks.
>
> I don't know if this is some known bug but it's really annoying.
>
> I have already reported this problem upstream, but no response.
>
>
Hi,
last two months when I copy multiple files from USB or SD to HDD after the first
file copying stucks.
I don't know if this is some known bug but it's really annoying.
I have already reported this problem upstream, but no response.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434145
So please if
Charles Curley wrote:
>
> The board is an ASUS H97M-E, bios date 05/15/2015. Processor is
> Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790S CPU @ 3.20GHz, with eight processors.
>
> Now what?
4 cores, 8 threads.
As others are pointing out, this could be thermal. Clean the
fan, consider replacing the power
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 02:29:25PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> MCE events:
> 1 2021-03-20 13:58:30 -0600 error: Internal parity error, mcg mcgstatus=0,
> mci Corrected_error Error_enabled, mcgcap=0x0c09,
> status=0x904f0005, tsc=0xf442c87fda, walltime=0x605653e5,
>
Charles Curley wrote:
> Mar 20 13:58:29 hawk rasdaemon[892]: Calling ras_mc_event_opendb()
> Mar 20 13:58:29 hawk rasdaemon[892]: cpu 03:rasdaemon: mce_record store:
> 0x55c124c9b148
> Mar 20 13:58:29 hawk kernel: [ 300.407406] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine
> check events logged
> Mar 20
My syslog is reporting things like:
Mar 20 13:58:29 hawk rasdaemon[892]: Calling ras_mc_event_opendb()
Mar 20 13:58:29 hawk rasdaemon[892]: cpu 03:rasdaemon: mce_record store:
0x55c124c9b148
Mar 20 13:58:29 hawk kernel: [ 300.407406] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine
check events logged
Mar 20
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 09:42:28PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 09:22:24PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Hoi,
> >
> > Computer met XCFE daar kan ik `su - kees` doen.
> > Als user kees mag ik geen grafische opstarten
> > want DISPLAY staat niet goed.
> >
> > Hoe dat
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 09:22:24PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> Computer met XCFE daar kan ik `su - kees` doen.
> Als user kees mag ik geen grafische opstarten
> want DISPLAY staat niet goed.
>
> Hoe dat wel goed te zetten?
>
Vooraf aan de "switch user"
xhost +si:local:kees
Hoi,
Computer met XCFE daar kan ik `su - kees` doen.
Als user kees mag ik geen grafische opstarten
want DISPLAY staat niet goed.
Hoe dat wel goed te zetten?
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
> In my (not so humble) opinion, this level of security could make sense
> for a disident in a totalitarian state, less so for regular users in
> democratic country.
Reminds me of the saying that the difference between USA and USSR was
that in USSR the population knew that it was propaganda.
On 20.03.2021 22:05, Andy Smith wrote:
Anyway in OP's position, they have lost data which they need to
restore and while they could wait and see if the errors are
increasing in number they probably just want to get it replaced
ASAP.
Thanks for your input, Andy.
Now OP should be able to make a
On 3/20/21 3:50 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
I have been using amanda on this machine to back up the rest of my
machines for over 2 decades. So I'm not a new user.
But I installed a 240 gig SSD about 6 months back, because its use as a
holding disk tripled amanda's speed at backing
On Saturday 20 March 2021 08:29:04 Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 20.03.2021 15:50, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > I have been using amanda on this machine to back up the rest of my
> > machines for over 2 decades. So I'm not a new user.
> >
> > But I installed a 240 gig SSD
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> In my (not so humble) opinion, this level of security could make sense
> for a disident in a totalitarian state, less so for regular users in
> democratic country.
>
And you disappoint me here too - you believe in illusion of democracy, which
is not so obvious as i.e. in
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Good luck in doing public key cryptography without publishing the public
> key :)
Andrei - you disappoint me here!
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:36:37PM +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> Personally, I don't think it is wise to throw away any HDD as soon as it
> gets a few pending bad blocks for whatever reason.
It really depends upon your risk stance.
At home, on my home fileserver, it has RAID, it
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> How is the "version number" interpreted?
>
> "1:" ?
epoch
Epochs can help when the upstream version numbering scheme changes, but
they must be used with care. You should not change the epoch, even in
experimental, without getting consensus on debian-devel first.
>
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 08:16:22AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> peter@joule:/home/peter$ dpkg -l | grep qemu-system-x86
> ii qemu-system-x86 1:3.1+dfsg-8+deb10u8
> i386 QEMU full system emulation binaries (x86)
>
> How is the "version
Hi,
peter@joule:/home/peter$ dpkg -l | grep qemu-system-x86
ii qemu-system-x86 1:3.1+dfsg-8+deb10u8
i386 QEMU full system emulation binaries (x86)
How is the "version number" interpreted?
"1:" ?
"3.1" qemu release number?
"dfsg-8" ?
"deb10u8" Debian
On Vi, 19 mar 21, 00:54:08, deloptes wrote:
> Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> > I hear there's a lot of interesting discussions there about how to
> > communicate safely, but sadly so far I haven't managed to configure my
> > safe not-internet-connected machine to participate.
>
> do you think it is
On 20.03.2021 15:50, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
I have been using amanda on this machine to back up the rest of my
machines for over 2 decades. So I'm not a new user.
But I installed a 240 gig SSD about 6 months back, because its use as a
holding disk tripled amanda's speed at backing
Greetings all;
I have been using amanda on this machine to back up the rest of my
machines for over 2 decades. So I'm not a new user.
But I installed a 240 gig SSD about 6 months back, because its use as a
holding disk tripled amanda's speed at backing up this 6 machine system.
But amanda has
On 20.03.2021 13:50, David wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 19:53, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
To perform surface scans you can use SMART short and long scans, and also a program called
"badblocks" from the package "e2fsprogs".
Be sure to unmount "/dev/sda1" before performing the scans.
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 19:53, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> To perform surface scans you can use SMART short and long scans, and also a
> program called "badblocks" from the package "e2fsprogs".
> Be sure to unmount "/dev/sda1" before performing the scans.
Hi, I wonder why you give this
27 matches
Mail list logo
