Hello,
After each boot, the equivalent of apt update is automatically done in
background, through policykit (apt database is locked by policykitd). So
I think there is a timer triggroing this. I'd like to disable this when
my laptop is on expensive link (eg 4G link, or abroad). So I'd like to
Hellow Debian Hackers,
This email[0].
The submitter use reportbug(1) program of Debian.
And it seems that submitter use `reportbug.debian.org' as relay SMTP.
And the contents are good i think.
By the way, SpamAssassin did mark as SPAM (X-Spam-Flag: YES).
What do you guys think about this issue?
On 2/18/24 19:20, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
I am convinced that the missing space is used by btrfs snapshot process.
Perhaps. But, are you re-balancing your btrfs file systems regularly?
https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/btrfs-progs/btrfs-balance.8.en.html
Doing it by hand was not practic
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 02:20:20PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
[...]
> I am convinced that the missing space is used by btrfs snapshot process. But
> WHY is the used space reporting on my daily driver LESS than that on the
> spare machine 29G vs 35G? The original install was the same .iso Ah
On Sun 18 Feb 2024 at 12:41:29 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 18/02/2024 11:40, David Wright wrote:
> >$ ssh bhost
> >$ udisksctl unlock --block-device /dev/disk/by-partlabel/Nokia01
> >Passphrase:
> > AUTHENTICATING FOR org.freedesktop.udisks2.encrypted-unlock ===
> >Auth
On 19/2/24 10:26, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 18/2/24 14:49, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 18/2/24 07:34, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
Yes the / partitions are btrfs
So the apparently missing space is perhaps taken up by btrfs snapshots.
Seems to be the prime
On 19/2/24 13:41, Felix Miata wrote:
would be some places to start. Didn't you do your
https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/btrfs-filesystem.html
reading yet? ?_?
My eyes have glazed over too often, already. I know I have to get back,
but that NEED to do it is making it harder.
--
All t
Keith Bainbridge composed on 2024-02-18 14:49 (UTC+1100):
> debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
>> So the apparently missing space is perhaps taken up by btrfs snapshots.
> Seems to be the prime suspect.
While snapshotting is obviously a consumer, until you use the right tool for the
job, you wo
On 19/2/24 11:15, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
Have you read their FAQ page about hard links?
https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/blob/dev/FAQ.md#how-do-snapshots-
with-hard-links-work
Very interesting. Thank you
I have totally missed the concept of copying all files as a starting point.
I
On 19/02/2024 06:26, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
So later yesterday afternoon I created a new snapshot with no obvious
change is free space.
Effect of snapshots is delayed. When you remove a file that does not
belong to any snapshot, some disk space is reclaimed. However to restore
a file (even
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 16:15:01 -0800
Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> Have you read their FAQ page about hard links?
> https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/blob/dev/FAQ.md#how-do-snapshots-with-hard-links-work
An excellent writeup. The only thing I would add is that creating a
hard link does require an e
On Mon, Feb 19 2024 at 10:52:16 AM, Keith Bainbridge
wrote:
> As promised:
> I said sometime in this thread that timeshift (and Back in Time) use
> hard links to create progressive copies of the system. The more I
> think about how hard links reportedly work, I reckon it can't be
> simply hard li
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:52:16AM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> I said sometime in this thread that timeshift (and Back in Time) use hard
> links to create progressive copies of the system. The more I think about how
> hard links reportedly work, I reckon it can't be simply hard links.
I
On 18/2/24 14:49, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 18/2/24 07:34, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
Yes the / partitions are btrfs
So the apparently missing space is perhaps taken up by btrfs snapshots.
Seems to be the prime suspect. If that's the case, btrfs is NOT
On 18/2/24 14:08, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 17/02/2024 09:52, Greg Wooledge wrote:
If so, you *could* have data inside the /home directory
of the root file system, which is hidden by the /home file system that's
mounted over it. You'd need to unmount /home to check.
A less intrusive way to ins
Hellow Ash!
On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 11:14 +1300, Ash Joubert wrote:
> On 2024-02-19 08:57, Ash Joubert wrote:
> > I removed /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf (as root) and ran
> > "fc-cache -f" (as user). I still have a few missing emojis in
> > xfce4-terminal (flags and combined emojis) but ge
On 2024-02-19 08:57, Ash Joubert wrote:
I removed /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf (as root) and ran
"fc-cache -f" (as user). I still have a few missing emojis in
xfce4-terminal (flags and combined emojis) but geany is fixed.
Working test-emoji screenshot attached (xfce4-terminal on sid). 😊
On 18 Feb 2024 21:28 +0100, from borde...@tutanota.com (Borden):
> what the default is when neither of those are set (which doesn't
> work). Is this another "undocumented feature" of GRUB?
Would you be willing to post your /boot/grub/grub.cfg for a setup
where you get the blank screen GRUB?
--
M
> Or perhaps you have all colors set to blank.
> Try add something like
> GRUB_COLOR_NORMAL="light-blue/black"
> GRUB_COLOR_HIGHLIGHT="light-cyan/blue"
Unfortunately, that didn't work. Still a blank screen. I'm curious that if
GRUB_TERMINAL=gfxterm works and
GRUB_TERMINAL=console works, what the
On 2024-02-19 07:08, Ash Joubert wrote:
On 2024-02-18 23:33, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 16:23 +0900, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
I am using Gnome desktop in Debian Sid. Today, after upgrade package
via apt update/upgrade, i can not see emoji in gnome-terminal.
I am also on sid and
On 2024-02-18 23:33, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 16:23 +0900, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
Hellow,
I am using Gnome desktop in Debian Sid. Today, after upgrade package
via apt update/upgrade, i can not see emoji in gnome-terminal.
(...)
Just now, i did clean-up with screenshots [1],[2]
On Sat, 2024-02-17 at 18:00 -0500, Default User wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 09:16 +0900, Byunghee HWANG (황병희) wrote:
> > Hellow^^^
> >
> > On Sat, 2024-02-10 at 19:54 -0500, Default User wrote:
> > > :(
> > > (...)
> > > Any recommendations for a GOOD alternative?
> >
> > How about Emacs?
> >
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 16:23 +0900, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
> Hellow,
>
> I am using Gnome desktop in Debian Sid. Today, after upgrade package
> via apt update/upgrade, i can not see emoji in gnome-terminal.
>
> (...)
Just now, i did clean-up with screenshots [1],[2],[3].
[1] test screenshot in bu
23 matches
Mail list logo