Re: partition reporting full, but not

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:21:05PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > > On 21/2/24 10:47, Felix Miata wrote: > > I didn't think so, which begs the question why OP Keith is using it. :p > > -- > > I read somewhere about 2 years ago, that it automagically de-duped data > when it detected I was copy

Re: partition reporting full, but not

On 21/2/24 10:47, Felix Miata wrote: I didn't think so, which begs the question why OP Keith is using it. :p -- I read somewhere about 2 years ago, that it automagically de-duped data when it detected I was copying the same file to different directories. It's not deliberate, but I have oft

Re: partition reporting full, but not

Keith Bainbridge composed on 2024-02-21 11:57 (UTC+1100): > Felix Miata wrote: >> A current thread from elsewhere that should be helpful: >> > really-the-solution/172576> >> btrfs filesystem usage / >> snapper li

Re: partition reporting full, but not

On 21/2/24 11:38, Felix Miata wrote: A current thread from elsewhere that should be helpful: btrfs filesystem usage / snapper list btrfs qgroup show / Thanks for the pr

Re: Determining which file is at a given LBA offset; was: HDD error: Current_Pending_Sector

On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 21:36 +, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 20 Feb 2024 12:51 -0500, from hunguponcont...@gmail.com (Default > User): > > But since the sector already can not be read, How can it be re- > > written > > to a "good" sector? > > Generally, it can't. It will be remapped if necessar

Re: partition reporting full, but not

to...@tuxteam.de composed on 2024-02-20 09:38 (UTC+0100): > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:42:18AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: >> Keith Bainbridge composed on 2024-02-20 17:45 (UTC+1100): >>> I just removed 3 snapshots from my daily driver with no change in used >>> space reported by df >> df doesn'

Re: partition reporting full, but not

Greg Wooledge composed on 2024-02-20 14:56 (UTC-0500): > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:47:26PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: >> Surely somewhere on debian.org such things must be addressed if Bookworm's >> default >> has also been changed to btrfs. > That has not happened. The default file system is

Re: HDD error: Current_Pending_Sector

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 17:51, Default User wrote: > > Hi guys! Hi to all readers, > Now it "works", BUT . . . I ran: > > sudo smartctl --test=long /dev/sdb on it, > > and it reports a Current_Pending_Sector error, at LBA 325904690. [...] > According to sudo smartctl --test=long /dev/sdb, > th

Re: Determining which file is at a given LBA offset; was: HDD error: Current_Pending_Sector

On 20 Feb 2024 12:51 -0500, from hunguponcont...@gmail.com (Default User): > But since the sector already can not be read, How can it be re-written > to a "good" sector? Generally, it can't. It will be remapped if necessary when something else is written to that sector. > If I knew which file (i

Guacamole/freerdp2 issue

Hi, I was using Guacamole with VNC until i switched on my main computer to Debian+Gnome (testing), which provides excellent RDP connection. The RDP is working from Windows, and other Debian computers, but not from Guacamole. Guacamole is running on my home server, and i also installed a Debian tes

Re: partition reporting full, but not

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:47:26PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > Surely somewhere on debian.org such things must be addressed if Bookworm's > default > has also been changed to btrfs. That has not happened. The default file system is still ext4.

Re: partition reporting full, but not

to...@tuxteam.de composed on 2024-02-20 09:38 (UTC+0100): > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:42:18AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: >> Keith Bainbridge composed on 2024-02-20 17:45 (UTC+1100): >> > I just removed 3 snapshots from my daily driver with no change in used >> > space reported by df >> df does

Re: HDD error: Current_Pending_Sector

On 2/20/24 09:51, Default User wrote: Hi guys! I am running Debian 12 Stable, up to date, on a low-spec Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Model 3511. Firmware is also up to date. I have a 4 Gb Western Digital external usb SATA HDD, Model WDC WD40NDZW-11A8JS1. It has only one partition, formatted as ext4.

Re: Re: GRUB lost graphical terminal mode

>On 19 Feb 2024 22:44 +0100, from borde...@tutanota.com (Borden): >>> Would you be willing to post your /boot/grub/grub.cfg for a setup >>> where you get the blank screen GRUB? >>  >> Yeah, I probably should have opened with that. Sorry: >>  >> ``` >> # If you change this file, run 'update-grub' af

HDD error: Current_Pending_Sector

Hi guys! I am running Debian 12 Stable, up to date, on a low-spec Dell Inspiron 15 3000 Model 3511. Firmware is also up to date. I have a 4 Gb Western Digital external usb SATA HDD, Model WDC WD40NDZW-11A8JS1. It has only one partition, formatted as ext4. The filesystem is labeled MSD00012. E

Re: GRUB lost graphical terminal mode

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:04:47 + Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> wrote: > On 19 Feb 2024 22:44 +0100, from borde...@tutanota.com (Borden): > >> Would you be willing to post your /boot/grub/grub.cfg for a setup > >> where you get the blank screen GRUB? > > > > Yeah, I probably should

Re: partition reporting full, but not

Felix Miata wrote: > Keith Bainbridge composed on 2024-02-20 17:45 (UTC+1100): > > > I just removed 3 snapshots from my daily driver with no change in > > used space reported by df > > df doesn't know how to calculate freespace on btrfs. You need to be > typing > > btrfs filesystem df

Re: Timer doing apt update

On 20/02/2024 14:48, Erwan David wrote: Le 20/02/2024 à 03:20, Max Nikulin a écrit : busctl get-property \   org.freedesktop.NetworkManager \   /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager \   org.freedesktop.NetworkManager Metered It would also require to configure NetworkManager to set this correctly. E

Re: Timer doing apt update

On 20/02/2024 19:44, Greg Wooledge wrote: 1) This apt-daily.timer stuff is quite complex and difficult to discover and understand. I am sorry that I confused enough people by my statements. I believed that by default this timer runs "apt update" every day while upgrades are not enabled ou

Re: Timer doing apt update

Hello, On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 07:44:55AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: >This thing has no configuration file by default; you have to read the >comments in the software itself to figure out what it does. Or, say, the Debian Administrator's Handbook. https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debia

Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"?

On 2/20/24 04:29, David Christensen wrote: On 2/19/24 18:07, Felix Miata wrote: My experience with that particular color cables matches Gene's. Cut one open, and out comes a powdery substance instead of clean copper strands. I think most for gen 1.0 SATA 2 decades ago, so there shouldn't be man

Re: Timer doing apt update

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 07:44:55AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: [...] > For me, it's a combination of two things: > > 1) This apt-daily.timer stuff is quite complex and difficult to discover >and understand [...] I gather this from the thread, yes. I just checked, and the scripts come with a

Re: Timer doing apt update

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:39:56AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:17:17AM +0100, Michael wrote: > > i very much dislike the fact that my systems do things i am not aware of. > > I think one of the purposes of a Linux distribution is to pull > together a collection of dispara

Re: Timer doing apt update

Le 20/02/2024 à 12:46, Andy Smith a écrit : Hi, On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 08:52:09AM +0100, Erwan David wrote: I use KDE, and I do not know wether discover does an update by itself. I do not thind any setting about this I think it is very likely that KDE has an equivalent to GNOME, which does th

Re: Timer doing apt update

Hi, On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 08:52:09AM +0100, Erwan David wrote: > I use KDE, and I do not know wether discover does an update by itself. I do > not thind any setting about this I think it is very likely that KDE has an equivalent to GNOME, which does the equivalent of "apt update" every day and

Re: Timer doing apt update

Hi, On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:17:17AM +0100, Michael wrote: > i very much dislike the fact that my systems do things i am not aware of. I think one of the purposes of a Linux distribution is to pull together a collection of disparate software of their choosing and make default decisions for thei

Re: partition reporting full, but not

Hi, > when cfdisk reports: > Device Start End Sectors Size Type > /dev/sda2 1785522176 1786245119 722944 353M EFI System > /dev/sda3 1786245120 1933045759 146800640 70G EFI System > I don't understand the 'EFI System' note /dev/sda3 is / The partition type d

Re: partition reporting full, but not

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:21:15PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > > On 20/2/24 19:38, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: [...] > Tomas, the upgrade failure was earlier than these notes. It has now worked I see. > Sorry, but I don't know how to assess the snapshot space usage. Nor do I -- my question w

Re: partition reporting full, but not

On 20/2/24 19:38, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:42:18AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: Keith Bainbridge composed on 2024-02-20 17:45 (UTC+1100): I just removed 3 snapshots from my daily driver with no change in used space reported by df df doesn't know how to calculate free

Re: partition reporting full, but not

On 20/2/24 18:42, Felix Miata wrote: btrfs filesystem df OK, so please interpret: >> btrfs filesystem df -h / Data, single: total=32.80GiB, used=31.94GiB System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB Metadata, DUP: total=1.50GiB, used=1.10GiB GlobalReserve, single: total=71.69MiB, used=0.00B k

Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem)

On Dienstag, 20. Februar 2024 06:58:31 -03 Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ wrote: > On Montag, 19. Februar 2024 21:48:52 -03 Andy Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:12:44PM -0300, Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / > > KY4PZ > wrote: > > > The notorious red SATA cables - I threw them out long

Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"? (Was Re: Orphaned Inode Problem)

On Montag, 19. Februar 2024 21:48:52 -03 Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:12:44PM -0300, Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ wrote: > > The notorious red SATA cables - I threw them out long ago. The red > > pigment eats up the fine copper threads, changing the impedance of > > the ca

Re: red SATA cables "notoriously bad"?

On 2/19/24 18:07, Felix Miata wrote: My experience with that particular color cables matches Gene's. Cut one open, and out comes a powdery substance instead of clean copper strands. I think most for gen 1.0 SATA 2 decades ago, so there shouldn't be many still around bogging down 3.0 drives. A

Re: Timer doing apt update

On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 5:23:35 AM CET, Greg Wooledge wrote: I'm not sure how to interpret this combination of things. Do these default settings mean "the update/upgrade script will run, but it won't actually do anything"? kind of... lines 354-360 (on bookworm) of said script (/usr/lib/

Re: partition reporting full, but not

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:42:18AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > Keith Bainbridge composed on 2024-02-20 17:45 (UTC+1100): > > > I just removed 3 snapshots from my daily driver with no change in used > > space reported by df > > df doesn't know how to calculate freespace on btrfs. You need to be t

Re: GRUB lost graphical terminal mode

On 19 Feb 2024 22:44 +0100, from borde...@tutanota.com (Borden): >> Would you be willing to post your /boot/grub/grub.cfg for a setup >> where you get the blank screen GRUB? > > Yeah, I probably should have opened with that. Sorry: > > ``` > # If you change this file, run 'update-grub' afterwards