Re: Restoring filenames from partly damaged ext4-filesystem

2012-02-10 Thread Bernd Schubert
On 02/10/2012 06:07 PM, Rudolf Zran wrote: Hello Bernd! I have written some tools in the past to recover the file structure of an over-formated ext3/ext4 device based on directory blocks. With some tweaks it should be able to assign the file#inode_numbers in lost+found to a directory structure

Re: Restoring filenames from partly damaged ext4-filesystem

2012-02-10 Thread Bernd Schubert
On 02/10/2012 10:32 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:36:52PM +, Rudolf Zran wrote: * "fsck.ext4 -b $SBOK -B 4096 -v -y /dev/loop0" recoveres after a long time. Filesystem is mountable. Root is empty besides lost+found folder, which contains about 300GB mostly useless data

Re: Restoring filenames from partly damaged ext4-filesystem

2012-02-10 Thread Bernd Schubert
On 02/09/2012 10:22 PM, Rudolf Zran wrote: Hello Andreas! [ext4 partition overwritten with garbage at the beginning] * photorec from the testdisk package recoveres, luckily!, about 500GB of data. Though the content seems to be pretty reasonable, no filenames are recovered, since ph

Re: Corrupt data - RAID sata_sil 3114 chip

2009-01-07 Thread Bernd Schubert
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 06:38:28 Robert Hancock wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Bernd Schubert wrote: > >> But now more than a year has passed again without doing anything > >> about it and actually this is what I strongly criticize. Most p

Re: Corrupt data - RAID sata_sil 3114 chip

2009-01-03 Thread Bernd Schubert
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 02:53:09PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: > Bernd Schubert wrote: >> [sorry sent again, since Robert dropped all mailing list CCs and I >> didn't notice first] >> >> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 12:31:12PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: >>>

Re: Corrupt data - RAID sata_sil 3114 chip

2009-01-03 Thread Bernd Schubert
[sorry sent again, since Robert dropped all mailing list CCs and I didn't notice first] On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 12:31:12PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: > Bernd Schubert wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 01:39:36PM +, Alan Cox wrote: >>> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:30:07 +

Re: Corrupt data - RAID sata_sil 3114 chip

2009-01-03 Thread Bernd Schubert
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 01:39:36PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:30:07 +0100 > Bernd Schubert wrote: > > > Hello Bengt, > > > > sil3114 is known to cause data corruption with some disks. > > News to me. There are a few people with lots of SI a

Re: Corrupt data - RAID sata_sil 3114 chip

2009-01-03 Thread Bernd Schubert
On Saturday 03 January 2009 03:31:57 Redeeman wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 22:30 +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > Hello Bengt, > > > > sil3114 is known to cause data corruption with some disks. So far I only > > know about Seagate, but maybe there issues with newer Sam

Re: Corrupt data - RAID sata_sil 3114 chip

2009-01-02 Thread Bernd Schubert
Hello Bengt, sil3114 is known to cause data corruption with some disks. So far I only know about Seagate, but maybe there issues with newer Samsungs as well? http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.2/2035.html Unfortuntely this issue has been simply ignored by the SATA developers :(

RE: Debian LSI Logic RAID

2008-09-04 Thread Bernd Schubert
Privet! Michail Kulagin wrote: > Hello Francois! > I use Intel S5000PAL server platform with integrated LSI Logic RAID > module. Debian installer could not find any HW RAID with mounted HDDs. > HDDs are visible for Debian if only they were not mounted to HW RAID. So > is there any quick decision

Re: readonly NFS root: udev means can't use stock kernel? (long)

2007-01-14 Thread Bernd Schubert
Hi Alexis, Alexis Huxley wrote: > > ('ga010133vm3' is my test NFS root client. '134.171.27.236' is my NFS > root server.) > > root mounted three times! > - > > ga010133vm3# df Check in /proc/mounts what is really mounted, entries in /etc/mtab are not always identical.

Re: X.org killed my ATI TV

2006-08-21 Thread Bernd Schubert
Kent West wrote: > Bernd Schubert wrote: >> Kent West wrote: >> >> >>> I kept hoping that a new upgrade of the box would bring in the necessary >>> stuff to get it working again, as the GATOS site indicated (as well as I >>> could make out - t

Re: X.org killed my ATI TV

2006-08-19 Thread Bernd Schubert
Kent West wrote: > > I kept hoping that a new upgrade of the box would bring in the necessary > stuff to get it working again, as the GATOS site indicated (as well as I > could make out - the site's not organized in a way that I can make much > sense of it) that all the ati.2 driver stuff had bee

Re: Google Earth display problem

2006-07-09 Thread Bernd Schubert
> -- the display behaves weirdly. This is difficult to describe, >but the "earth" image does not stay put in its proper place >inside the window; it often "jumps" to the left, becoming >invisible, or sometimes half-obscured by the left edge of the >window. Sometimes resizing the w

Re: Unmount a busy NFS share

2006-06-18 Thread Bernd Schubert
Frank Blendinger wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:10:56PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: >> >> Just try 'lsof |grep mothermole'. >> > >> > This hangs, just as my try with fuser did. >> >> Hmm, this sounds as if /mothermole is in your PATH,

Re: Unmount a busy NFS share

2006-06-18 Thread Bernd Schubert
Frank Blendinger wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: >> Frank Blendinger wrote: >> > I want to unmount a busy NFS share, but failed to do so, even with a >> > umount -f. >> >> [...] >> >> > I also tried a

Re: Unmount a busy NFS share

2006-06-18 Thread Bernd Schubert
Frank Blendinger wrote: > Hello, > > I want to unmount a busy NFS share, but failed to do so, even with a > umount -f. > [...] > I also tried a ``fuser /mothermole'' to see which process blocks the > mountpoint, but that just hangs, I aborted after some minutes. I'm Just try 'lsof |grep mothe

Re: Google Earth display problem

2006-06-17 Thread Bernd Schubert
Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: > -- the display behaves weirdly. This is difficult to describe, >but the "earth" image does not stay put in its proper place >inside the window; it often "jumps" to the left, becoming >invisible, or sometimes half-obscured by the left edge of the >window.

Re: What's wrong with X forwarding / remote X logins?

2006-04-10 Thread Bernd Schubert
Hello Christian, I'm doing remote X over ssh all the day without your described problems, so something seems to be broken with your setup/applications. Christian Pernegger wrote: > > I hadn't used X for anything but local logins in a few years, but back > in the day X forwarding or logging in

Re: lockd: cannot unmonitor

2004-10-09 Thread Bernd Schubert
> > 1 lockd_down: lockd failed to exit, clearing pid > 2 flushing ide devices: hda hdc > 3 Power down. > 4 lockd: cannot unmonitor 192.168.1.1 > 5 portmap: server localhost not responding, timed out > [snip] > Does anyone know how I can fix this problem? > > Thanks in advance, > Stanley. > PS:

Re: can not access my disk with cfdisk

2004-05-31 Thread Bernd Schubert
Kent West wrote: > LeVA wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>I have a hard drive with two partitions. I can mount them, and can >>read/write them. But when I type: >># cfdisk /dev/hde >>FATAL ERROR: Bad primary partition 2: Partition begins after end-of-disk >>Press any key to exit cfdisk >> >>I get the above err