Generally in a network environment you want to 'strap' ports to speed/duplex
settings and avoid autonegotiate as this can cause problems... when both
ends are set to 'auto' it almost always causes problems such as links
re-negotiating out of the blue.. this kinda sounds like what you are
experiencing.

I don't know what the commands are but if possible I would 'strap' both nics
to 100/full. I have also found that some nic's (drivers) don't really
support 100/full all that well (in general not just under linux) and they
actually perform better when set to 100/half.

Charles





----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Sackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Noah Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian User List"
<debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Strange network performance

Well, that's all gone through and worked - not quite as simple as I
thought, but I got there. Network performance seems a little faster
than before but still a little slow compared with what I thought
would have been possible with a 100TX crossover network. Must be
a limitation of the cheap cards.

Thanks for your help.

Matthew

On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 06:56:31PM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> Yes, it's a 2.4.9 kernel on both machines with the included natsemi
> driver.
>
> dmesg reports much the same for both machines:
>
> eth0: link is back. Enabling watchdog.
> eth0: Setting full-duplex based on negotiated link capability.
> eth0: Link changed: Autonegotiation advertising 05e1  partner 0000.
> eth0: no link. Disabling watchdog.
> eth0: Link changed: Autonegotiation advertising 05e1  partner 45e1.
> eth0: link is back. Enabling watchdog.
>
>
> I'll replace the driver with the one from scyld.com - it's just a matter
> of physically over writing /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/natsemi.c with the
> new one right?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matthew
>
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 01:41:59PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 06:36:05PM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> > > I've just set up a 100TX network with 2 computer both running debian.
> > > Netgear FA311 cards and a single cross-over cable.
> >
> > What version of the kernel are you running?  If it's 2.4, are you
> > running the natsemi driver included with the kernel, or did you download
> > it from scyld.com?  If you're running the version that came with the
> > kernel, try replacing it with the one from
> > http://www.scyld.com/network/netsemi.html.  The one in the kernel is
> > based on that driver, but has been modified.  You may have more success
> > with the original.
> >
> > Also, use dmesg and see if anything is being logged by the kernel
> > relating to these issues.  I've seen some IRQ problems with the
> > natsemi-based cards.
> >
> > noah
> >
> > --
> >  _______________________________________________________
> > | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
> > | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthew Sackman
> Nottingham,
> ENGLAND
>
> Using Debian/GNU Linux
> Enjoying computing
>
> It said 'Required Windows XP or better.'
> So I installed Linux.



--

Matthew Sackman
Nottingham,
ENGLAND

Using Debian/GNU Linux
Enjoying computing

It said 'Required Windows XP or better.'
So I installed Linux.


Reply via email to