And as I am quite paranoid - won't .. daren't.. use dselect..
what is the answer then?
thank you
clare
On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Ed Cogburn wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I be wary of ubgrading from libc6 2.0.6 to 2.0.7? Or can I just
blithely replace the library?
Andrew Tarr
On 8859 xxx 2001, Orn E. Hansen wrote:
Date: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mi=F0,?= 03 Sep 1997 23:00:14 +0200 (CET DST)
From: Orn E. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 03-Sep-97 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Hm, interesting thought.. Right now it does sort by the Date: line which
is quite nice, it puts all the
Please can anyone tell me what might have sparked the message:
lpr: unable to get official name for local machine
Sorry folks, I have found how I caused this - it was by deleting
a line
n.n.n.n bay
from /etc/hosts. ( I got the lpr source to find that out, I find if I put
the same IP numbers as
Hi group:
Please can anyone tell me what might have sparked the message:
lpr: unable to get official name for local machine
I have re-installed the lpr from lpr_5.9-13.1.deb, but no cure that way.
hostname gets the right answer for the machine name (bay).
Root can cat to lp2 and print.
) the bios and debian's own startup said the
printer was.(I also have a note that I initted via boot/root menus telling it
that is where the printer is and saved that to my custom boot disk.
I have not installed lilo, but I think it has an option to put the printer
details.)
clare
--
Clare
5 matches
Mail list logo
