Re: possible server compromitation

Jon Dowland píše v Po 21. 08. 2006 v 19:05 +0100: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 06:44:00PM +0200, David Siroky > wrote: > > Attackers deleted all access.log and error.log files > > (which I had among the web files) > > I assume by "among the web files" you mean y

Re: possible server compromitation

Sergio Cuéllar Valdés píše v Po 21. 08. 2006 v 09:51 -0500: > On 8/21/06, David Siroky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I have an urgent situation. On one of my servers disapeared all apache > > "error.log" and "access.log" files and

possible server compromitation

Hi! I have an urgent situation. On one of my servers disapeared all apache "error.log" and "access.log" files and other files containing "logo" or "login". I found some unknown processes. # ps -el ... 1 S 5000 1008 1 0 75 0 - 572 - ?00:00:16 iroffer 0 S 5000 7574 1

iptables, ipp2p

Hi! I successfully compiled ipp2p, modprobe doesn't print any message but everytime a try to use a rule with the ipp2p (e.g. "iptables -A FORWARD -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j DROP") it prints iptables: match `ipp2p' v (I'm v1.3.3). and "iptables -L prints" empty chains. Does anyone have some experience w

ignore chkrootkit false positive

Hi! My chkrootkit is reporting "INFECTED PORT 465" where is my regular ssmtp Postfix daemon. I found a lots of discussions about this problem but everywhere was the last answer "That's OK, you can ignore it". I want the chkrootkit ignore it. Is there any configuration option for this? Thank you.

Re: SW RAID read performance

So what about Linux implementation? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh píše v Pá 04. 08. 2006 v 11:30 -0300: > On Fri, 04 Aug 2006, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > AFAIK RAID1 offers faster seeks to the data, but not striped reads. > > RAID1 offers, in theory, stripped reads with an arbitrary stripe size. It

Re: SW RAID read performance

Dave Ewart píše v Čt 03. 08. 2006 v 19:31 +0100: > On Thursday, 03.08.2006 at 07:30 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > > >I have 2 disks in RAID 1 and I expected reading will be approx. 2x > > >faster then a single disk reading because there can be used the same > > >technique as on RAID 0. I tested

SW RAID read performance

Hi! I have 2 disks in RAID 1 and I expected reading will be approx. 2x faster then a single disk reading because there can be used the same technique as on RAID 0. I tested it with bonnie++. Can linux SW RAID 1 read "in stripes" to boost the reading performance? Thank you. David -- To UNSUBSC

small GTK "Open file" dialog

Hi! I have a little cosmetical problem but it is annoying. By default my GTK2 standard dialogs (open, save, ...) are very small. Is there any configuration file where I can set those dimensions? Thank you! David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

GFS

Hi! I'm trying to build a debian cluster with GFS storage. I have big problems compiling GFS sources. I have a distribution kernel 2.6.16. Package kernel-patch-2.6-gfs is useless because it is old (it is for 2.6.10 kernel). Release ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/cluster/releases/cluster-1.02.00.

Re: slow loading of GTK programs

Have a nice day! David Siroky (net) píše v Pá 09. 06. 2006 v 20:16 +0200: > Hi! > > Today I made an upgrade of my Debian (unstable) system. I was a hell > with those x11-common dependencies :-) But now almost everything is fine > except all GTK programs are starting very long time.

slow loading of GTK programs

Hi! Today I made an upgrade of my Debian (unstable) system. I was a hell with those x11-common dependencies :-) But now almost everything is fine except all GTK programs are starting very long time. Much longer then before the upgrade. I used "strace" and I realized that those programs are trying