RE: Mail Server

2002-06-28 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
ntly doing large enterprize installs just to see what's involved and to see if I can get it to work. If I can get something to work at home, then getting it to work on the job is quite a bit easier... Barry - Original Message - From: "FreeportWeb Debian Support Account" &

RE: Mail Server

2002-06-28 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 07:53:03AM -0400, FreeportWeb Debian Support Account wrote: | Actually, your both not totally correct. If you follow the "Life | with qmail" document, its called "vpopmail smtp authentication". [POP-before-SMTP] ok... | -- hence nobody can actually

RE: Mail Server

2002-06-28 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
m, I block everything from the outside and only allow intranet sending. When I'm at work and want to send mail using my home account, I open a SSH session forwarding ports 110 and 25. Port 110 is totally blocked to the internet. Barry - Original Message - From: "FreeportWeb De

RE: Mail Server

2002-06-28 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
Actually, your both not totally correct. If you follow the "Life with qmail" document, its called "vpopmail smtp authentication". Its fairly "hands-off", and requires no intervention or adding of IP addresses to the system (manually), its all automated, it works as such: If you have a POP3 mail

RE: Mail Server

2002-06-28 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
Depending on your needs, albiet scalability, security, performance, ease-of-use etc. I find qmail to be the best solution for a dependable and secure mail server. qmail installs as a closed-relay by default, and if you follow the "Life with qmail" document, you'll have a mail system that you can

networking script not executing.

2002-06-15 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
I have interesting problem on one of my boxes. We've tried everything to figure this out. Basically, when the machine is started, the /etc/init.d/networking script isn't running, or its not running correctly so that ifup executes. I'll explain the issue: The machine is a woody machine using th

RE: Installing debian

2002-06-12 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
Which leads to my question. Once you have that up and running, whats the best way to install KDE? Gary -Original Message- From: Tom Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:54 PM To: G. L. `Griz' Inabnit; debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Installing debi

KDE on Woody 2.4.19

2002-06-07 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
I'm struggling a little with a Woody installation and KDE, I have the 2.4.18 kernel. I installed XFree86, works great. startx comes up, looks good, runs fine, twm is even running... Now, I would like to install KDE 3.0.x, which I want as my default desktop, but i'm running into issues both doin

RE: HELP: Wine + KaZaA Lite Problems

2002-06-07 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
Yes. Your wine configuration is probably suspect. Thats a common error when your trying to run a windows application that can't find the appropriate dll's. Try the command line option to specify the location of the shlwap.dll (as well as others that you'll need). Use the real DLL's... I actually

RE: KaZaA + Debian Woody + XP

2002-06-07 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
r@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: KaZaA + Debian Woody + XP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 07 June 2002 16:08, FreeportWeb Debian Support Account wrote: > Actually, there is a great version that this dude from europe has produced. > Its called "KaZaA Lite". He&#

RE: KaZaA + Debian Woody + XP

2002-06-07 Thread FreeportWeb Debian Support Account
Actually, there is a great version that this dude from europe has produced. Its called "KaZaA Lite". He's cobbled together a version that is free of all the spyware and BS that comes with the "real" KaZaA. He also has several utilities on the site that removes all the spyware and adversement cra