I apologize for my home page announcement yesterday on this List.
Helmut
I welcome you at my new home page:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Hallelujah/
Hello everyone !
Please note that my home page address has changed:
My new address now is:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Hallelujah/
My Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will remain until the end of April 1999.
Come and visit !
Helmut
Hi !
I've got 3 questions:
1) I've worked with vi fine, until I installed elvis too. ( I'm only
assuming this has to do with installing elvis ... ) But now, vi doesn't
show the text of the file in an xterm, only on a console. After exiting
from vi (in an xterm), I have to type "reset" to see any
At 16:24 09.04.98 -0500, you wrote:
>On 9 Apr, Helmut Leinfellner wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>> I was trying to install XMCD and I think what I'm lacking is ... Motif.
>>
>> Where do I get it ?
>>
>
>Well since Motif libs cost about $100US you co
Hi !
I was trying to install XMCD and I think what I'm lacking is ... Motif.
Where do I get it ?
Thanks, Helmut
---
Accept the challenge! http://fbma.tuwien.ac.at/~e8426331/
... and write to me !
---
Hallo !
Ich habe StarOffice 4.0 installiert und sowohl die Installation als auch
das Programm selbst laufen EXTREM LANGSAM.
Weiß jemand, woran das liegen kann ?
Danke, Helmut
---
Accept the challenge! http://fbma.tuwien.ac.at/~e8
Hi !
I've installed StarOffice 4.0 (German version) and both the installation
process and the program itself are EXTREMELY slow.
I don't have a clue why.
"top" shows that soffice (the program name) gets only about 1%-3% of CPU.
Does anyone know what could be wrong?
Thanks, please reply personall
At 23:51 12.03.98 -1000, you wrote:
>
>Hi All,
>
>I've been struggling as a newbie both to Linux and programming to prepare
>adequately to install Debian without too many tears. Been at at it for
>four days days now, reading docs/faqs, preparing my fully-functional (at
>the moment Win95 based) Qua
Hi everyone !
Just checking by to give you a POSITIVE update on my
"fdisk-partitioning-Win95-DOS-BIOS" problem and to let others know the
solution if you have the same kind of problem.
The problem was with my hard drive (Quantum, 4.3 GB, CHS 14848-9-63). I
needed less than 1024 cylinders for DOS,
At 16:55 07.03.98 +0200, you wrote:
>On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, Helmut Leinfellner wrote:
>
>> Where do I get diskmanager ?
>
>
>Go and seek it from manufacturers www-pages. I have Quantum drives, so
>I found them from www.quantum.com. I never install it, so I don't really
>If you are going to use linux with that drive then you must use NORMAL
>mode. I noticed that number of heads affect how much DOS FDISK says size
>to be use. This drive have only 9 heads and lots of cylinders, so 1024
>cylinders mean only 283 MB room for DOS. My another drive have 15 heads
>and the
At 11:35 03.03.98 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi Helmut;
>
>I am not really much of an expert in this sort of problem but would like
>to see if I can help you to have a little better understanding of what
>is going on with your system (as best as I understand anyway)...
>
>The ROM portion of DOS loads and e
Hi !
I've still not solved the partition problem. :-(
I've set CHS in the BIOS to 14848 - 9 - 63. But this is "NORMAL" and
therefore DOS is in trouble.
If I set it to "LBA" and 524 - 255 - 63 I'm having trouble with the MBR
because lilo rewrote it (the Win95 version of the MBR) and I don't have
At 14:56 27.02.98 -0500, you wrote:
>HELMUT LEINFELLNER writes:
>> DOS fdisk gives:
>>
>> 1 PRI DOS YESHUA 1000 FAT16 100%
>> 2 EXT DOS1000 100%
>> 3 Non-DOS 6423%
>> 4 Non-DOS2047 100%
>>
>&
Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, HELMUT LEINFELLNER wrote:
>
> : Nathan E Norman wrote:
> : >
> : > On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, HELMUT LEINFELLNER wrote:
> : >
> : > : Hi !
> : > :
> : > : Just wanted to let you know that I can final
Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, HELMUT LEINFELLNER wrote:
>
> : Hi !
> :
> : Just wanted to let you know that I can finally run both Win95 and Linux
> : on different partitions. The key to this was to put the DOS partitions
> : FIRST.
> : The only thi
Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, HELMUT LEINFELLNER wrote:
>
> : Hi !
> :
> : Just wanted to let you know that I can finally run both Win95 and Linux
> : on different partitions. The key to this was to put the DOS partitions
> : FIRST.
> : The only thi
Hi !
Just wanted to let you know that I can finally run both Win95 and Linux
on different partitions. The key to this was to put the DOS partitions
FIRST.
The only thing still to solve right now is this:
DOS fdisk gives:
1 PRI DOS YESHUA 1000 FAT16 100%
2 EXT DOS1000 100%
3 Non-DOS
Hi! Thanks for your help!
Bob> What is your current status? Is anything already installed on
Bob> this disk? If not, all partitions should be removed and recreated.
Not really, I can delete everything on the disk again.
Bob> If some things are installed that need to be saved, it would be
Hi there !
I've partitioned my hard drive with fdisk / cfdisk this way:
Pri 1 Linux Swap (64 MB)
Pri 2 Linux native (1200 MB)
Pro 3 DOS (2 GB)
Pri 4 Extended DOS (4-part. 800 MB)
When I verify with fdisk it (correctly!) tells me that partition 3 starts
WITHIN partition 2 !
As a consequence, DOS
Hi !
I have two harddisks:
/dev/hda is for Win95.
/dev/hdc (4.3 GB) is partitioned:
1) swap for linux (64K)
2) linux (1GB)
3) primary DOS (2GB)
4) another DOS (4-part, 250 MB each)
Linux works fine, but Win95 (which boots from the first drive /dev/hda)
doesn't recognize the partitions of /dev/hdc
21 matches
Mail list logo
