Re: BitDefender-postfix [Solved]

Thanks for your reply. As it turned out, it didn't work because I didn't have vmailbox, vuid and vgid specified. Mostly because this is my workstation with just one user. Adding those fixed it. Which won't be a problem, because our mailservers have to have those files in any way. BitDefende

Re: BitDefender-postfix [Solved]

Thanks for your reply. As it turned out, it didn't work because I didn't have vmailbox, vuid and vgid specified. Mostly because this is my workstation with just one user. Adding those fixed it. Which won't be a problem, because our mailservers have to have those files in any way. BitDefende

BitDefender-postfix

Has anybody used this package successfully? The logs complain: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command) This doesn't happen when I comment the relevant BitDefender lines in main.cf and master.cf. So this recipient table seems to be part of BitD

Re: I want spam!

On Wednesday 14 January 2004 05:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Please send me lots and lots of spam, viruses, hoaxes, etc! > > I'm testing filters and want real-world spam to hit me. > > Send it all here! > I was already thinking "what's he doing". When you did the trick...would > you please tell

Re: Segmentation fault - meaning

On Thursday 08 January 2004 00:05, Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corcete Dutra wrote: > > I try to run it on the laptop I get a segmentation fault. What does > > that mean, and what sorts of things might cause it? > This is a but, plain and simple. It means that the program tried to > access some prot

Re: spamassassin [SOLVED]

On Wednesday 07 January 2004 13:02, Hans du Plooy wrote: > Thanks, but I don't think it's a bug - same versions of the same software > run on three identical machines with woody - just the one doesn't want to > play along. > > Something seems to be misconfigured -

Re: spamassassin

On Wednesday 07 January 2004 12:04, Colin Watson wrote: > The module is supposed to be loaded by spamd, not by you. If it isn't > working properly I'd consider a bug report (check if there isn't one > already filed first). Thanks, but I don't think it's a bug - same versions of the same software ru

Re: spamassassin

On Tuesday 06 January 2004 19:55, Monique Y. Herman wrote: > I've never seen this error message before, but I'm wondering if you > don't have razor installed, but have SA configured to run it? Monique, thank you. Your reply made me found the problem. I didn't have razor installed, but then I do

spamassassin

Hi all, I installed spamassassin-2.6.1 using apt-get (woody) When starting spamd, I get the following in my mail.log: Jan 6 16:41:21 hermes spamd[14266]: Failed to run RAZOR_CHECK SpamAssassin test, skipping: ^I(Can't locate object method "check_razor" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgS

woody upgrade/update path

ding production servers goes) way to upgrade these machines? Thank you kind regards Hans du Plooy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<    1   2   3   4