Re: Advantages of downloading Debian packages over tor

I do it for machines that is accessible over Tor only. And in some cases, just because I can do it. --  Jonathan Sélea PGP Key: 0x8B35B3C894B964DD Fingerprint: 4AF2 10DE 996B 673C 0FD8  AFA0 8B35 B3C8 94B9 64DD  On tor, 2019-03-28 at 07:18 +, André Rodier wrote: > Hello everyone, >

Thought regarding NGINX and Debian

thought about it? --  Jonathan Sélea PGP Key: 0x8B35B3C894B964DD Fingerprint: 4AF2 10DE 996B 673C 0FD8  AFA0 8B35 B3C8 94B9 64DD  signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Secure email server setup

On 01/15/18 22:30, Henning Follmann wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:56:20PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote: >>>> I would not recommend having a emailserver on the same server as a >>>> website, because if the website is compromised the "hacker" can just use

Re: Secure email server setup

>> I would not recommend having a emailserver on the same server as a >> website, because if the website is compromised the "hacker" can just use >> the mail() function >> to send emails in your name. > so can she/he if the mailserver is on a different host. That doesn't make > any difference. It w

Re: Secure email server setup

On 2018-01-15 00:19, Brian wrote: > On Sun 14 Jan 2018 at 16:43:53 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 02:26:03 PM Brian wrote: >>> On Sun 14 Jan 2018 at 12:49:46 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday, January 14, 2018 10:36:40 AM J.W. Foster wrote: > I

Re: Why was this package removed but apt?

Hi again, A quick update: It seems like Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "false"; Is not "false" by default but indeed true in unattended-upgrades on Debian 9 (stretch) Am I wrong about that? / Jonathan On 01/11/18 16:27, Jonathan Sélea wrote: Wel

Re: Why was this package removed but apt?

Well, it was removed by unattended-upgrades according to term.log and apt.log :) / Jonathan On 01/11/2018 03:35 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: It was installed manually by me: apt install php7.1-mbstring So I "explicitly asked" apt to install that package actually. So now the question is why/how

Re: Why was this package removed but apt?

On 2018-01-10 14:58, MAS Jean-Louis wrote: Le 10/01/2018 à 12:30, Jonathan Sélea a écrit : It was installed because CraftCMS depends on it :) According to term.log - unattended-upgrade performed the update 2018-01-06 06:41 and every package was updated (including php7.1-mbstring) Just two

Re: Why was this package removed but apt?

:50PM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote: Hi I am running Debian Stretch but with sury.org repository. :) Jonathan Downland suggested that I checked what package is depending php7.1-mbstring  on with: apt rdepends php7.1-mbstring php7.1-mbstring Reverse Depends: Depends: php7.1-mbstring-d

Re: Why was this package removed but apt?

+stretch~1.gbp1086fa) That particular package was not installed thou. / Jonathan On 01/10/2018 11:41 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Jonathan Sélea wrote: Good morning, I am trying to figure out why apt did

Why was this package removed but apt?

Good morning, I am trying to figure out why apt did remove this particular package when unattended-upgrade ran a couple of days ago: Start-Date: 2018-01-06 06:43:44 Commandline: /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade Remove: php7.1-mbstring:amd64 (7.1.13-1+0~20180105151623.14+stretch~1.gbp1086fa) End-