Re: Non-firefox browser?

On Saturday 11 June 2016 14:23:23 Michael Lange wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:00:45 -0400 > > Alan McConnell wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:39:04PM -0400, Leon.37428 wrote: > > > Here's a list of others: https://wiki.debian.org/WebBrowsers > > > > I have been

Re: non-functioning cds

On Saturday 11 June 2016 11:28:14 Shailesh Pundlik wrote: > I wrote to the e-mail address given by you but > have not received any reply yet. I'm not sure who or where you mean by "you". You certainly haven't emailed me! Assuming that Thomas is correct when he says "I assume you mean

Re: libreCAD, can't find help docs

On Thursday 09 June 2016 23:01:16 Gene Heskett wrote: >  org.kde.kcalc-6112 Probably absolutely irrelevant - but why have you got kde-anything?? (For general info, Gene is running TDE 14, not kde.) Lisi

Re: libreCAD, can't find help docs

On Monday 06 June 2016 20:00:42 David Wright wrote: > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 19:39:52 (+0100), Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Monday 06 June 2016 19:16:41 David Wright wrote: > > > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:56:07 (+0100), Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > On Monday 06 June 20

Re: libreCAD, can't find help docs

On Monday 06 June 2016 19:16:41 David Wright wrote: > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:56:07 (+0100), Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Monday 06 June 2016 18:49:50 David Wright wrote: > > > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 13:12:33 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > On Monday 06 June 2016

Re: libreCAD, can't find help docs

On Monday 06 June 2016 18:49:50 David Wright wrote: > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 13:12:33 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 06 June 2016 11:54:12 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > > On Seg, 06 Jun 2016, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > So the bottom line is that wheezy doesn't have a decent CAD

Re: June 2016

On Monday 06 June 2016 16:12:57 Glenn Holmer wrote: [snip] > What's with all the spam on this list? You don't see that on other > distros' mailing lists. And you have now made the job of the spam filters that much harder by repeating the spam. Not much spam gets through. Maybe other lists have

Re: First hint as to why kaffeine won't rx tv

On Sunday 05 June 2016 15:00:54 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 05 June 2016 06:49:18 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Sunday 05 June 2016 10:40:46 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > Based on that, I am pointing my finger at the newer kaffeine now. > > > > Kaffei

Re: libreCAD, can't find help docs

On Sunday 05 June 2016 14:58:39 Gene Heskett wrote: > I find entirely too often on linux, that the help > tut from that menu pulldown is missing an annoying percentage of the > time. Well, it's open source, Gene. Learn how to use it then write the docs. Or pay a technical author to learn how

Re: First hint as to why kaffeine won't rx tv

On Sunday 05 June 2016 10:40:46 Gene Heskett wrote: > Based on that, I am pointing my finger at the newer kaffeine now. Kaffeine-Trinity, I take it? > But > its been years since I've filed a bug. No clue how to do it on wheezy at > what could be considered this late date. You can't. Security

Re: Pursuant to my efforts to remove, and update the remaining :amd64 built packages [SOLVED]

On Sunday 05 June 2016 03:18:38 David Wright wrote: > On Sat 04 Jun 2016 at 21:11:23 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Saturday 04 June 2016 17:49:02 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > > > aptitude search '~g' > > > > And that returns an equally lengthy list, all prefaced with an 'id'. No > > clue

Re: Pursuant to my efforts to remove, and update the remaining :amd64 built packages

On Saturday 04 June 2016 19:06:01 Gene Heskett wrote: > Thank you for the link Lisi, I believe it was helpful in showing me that > at my age, I am finally in over my head, Many years ago now I had that salutary lesson - at a MUCH younger age. My six year old son was musically gifted. There is

Re: Pursuant to my efforts to remove, and update the remaining :amd64 built packages

On Saturday 04 June 2016 15:45:17 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 04 June 2016 05:53:17 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > > The aptitude on your system is an older version (on sid it is 0.8.1), > > Yes, this is wheezy. 6.8.2 here. Which, according to " is also Y2K-compliant, non-fattening, naturally

Re: CUPS under jessie

On Friday 03 June 2016 21:00:52 Alan McConnell wrote: > I would be very grateful for any aid.  Just to show how bad things > are:  I try to access  http://localhost:631 on my iceweasel and I get > the message:  Unable to connect.    ? ? ? ?    Aaaagghhh!! You said that you purged CUPS. Since

Re: Running without X was: Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Friday 03 June 2016 15:32:14 David Wright wrote: > I did discover that it's obvious if you try to Xorg -configure > while X is running There's a hole in the bucket, dear Eliza This is why I was trying to do it at single user level, to be *certain* that X wasn't running. :-) X is there,

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On Friday 03 June 2016 15:45:43 Mike McGinn wrote: > I am buying a new laptop in February, this one will be eight years old > by then. Then I shall start clean with Jessie. By next February (9 months away), shouldn't you be thinking of Stretch? It will probably already be full-frozen, and

Re: dphys-swapfile why don't us fallocate to create swapfile

On Thursday 02 June 2016 09:50:31 basti wrote: > so why you don't use this? Why doesn't who use it? Lisi

Re: SOS

On Friday 03 June 2016 15:09:01 Stephen Allen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:12:52PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 07:05:44AM -0500, Michael Milliman wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > >It got there because his grandson put it there. (He said last time.). > > > > > >

Re: icons missing in kde 5 applications

On Friday 03 June 2016 15:04:50 Stephen Allen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 07:27:41AM -0500, Ariel Molinuevo wrote: > > Ok. I managed to fix it following the instructions from here: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Qt#Configuration_of_Qt5_apps_under_e > >nvironments_other_than_KDE > >

Re: libreCAD, can't find help docs

On Friday 03 June 2016 10:59:53 Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings all; > > Wheezy, i386. > > libreCAD looks like a simple enough cad I could learn how to use but it > cannot find its help docs. > > I do not see a separate docs package in the repo's. > > Does anyone have a clue where they might be

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Friday 03 June 2016 09:59:29 Lisi Reisz wrote: > I didn't know what foo was anyway. I meant that I didn't know specifically what foo was in that context. Lisi

Running without X was: Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Friday 03 June 2016 10:07:13 Lisi Reisz wrote: >  I wanted to log in without X > and runlevel 1 has no X. So I next tried to shut X down. I have tried this before without success, so I googled again, and gathered that what I needed to do in fact was shut down my dm. See:

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Wednesday 01 June 2016 18:52:40 David Wright wrote: > AIUI one can configure a box to run X in all runlevels but 1; > however, there's no need to do it that way. None of my machines > run X automatically at runlevel 2: I have to use startx. This is indubitably true, but irrelevant to the

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Wednesday 01 June 2016 14:43:29 Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:10 PM Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> wrote: > > Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 23:56:02 Richard Hector wrote: > > >> On 01/06/16 07:31, Lisi Reisz wrote: > >

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Wednesday 01 June 2016 23:07:55 David Wright wrote: > On Tue 31 May 2016 at 20:31:32 (+0100), Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Thursday 31 March 2016 15:08:24 Brian wrote: > > > On Thu 31 Mar 2016 at 13:27:35 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > On Thursday 31 March 2016 1

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Thursday 02 June 2016 22:56:08 Britton Kerin wrote: > On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping > binary had the suid bit set. Now I get: > > $ ping www.google.com > ping: icmp open socket: Operation not permitted > 2 $ > > presumably because the bit isn't

Re: SOS

On Thursday 02 June 2016 09:44:51 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > [CCed, because probably not on list. Perhaps it's just a spam > trap -- so be it] He had already had two replies to the same question, which he is here asking for the second time, cc'd

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Wednesday 01 June 2016 01:20:52 John Hasler wrote: > Lisi writes: > > The pipe symbol doesn't work on the keyboard at present attached > > Then put the output of ps in a file and search that. The small part of the problem I am trying to solve at this precise minute is that I am working almost

Re: buntu kybosh

On Wednesday 01 June 2016 08:40:39 Lisi Reisz wrote: > That is why I said "of course".  And that is why I said *I* kyboshed it and > not *Ubuntu* kyboshed it. No I didn't. I said "*Ubuntu* kyboshed". Mea culpa. Lisi

Re: buntu kybosh

On Wednesday 01 June 2016 01:31:26 Felix Miata wrote: > > The word was a little stronger than is totally justified.  This is > > attached to a television.  I want to just turn it on.  Ubuntu boots but > > is unusable, so I have to hover over it, grab GRUB and get into Debian, > > because Ubuntu

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Wednesday 01 June 2016 00:42:47 Stephen Powell wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 19:25, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > ... > > Assuming that sshd is actually running at that stage, which it looks as > > though it isn't > > ... > > Looks as though I've given you mostl

Re: buntu kybosh (was: How to properly install...)

On Wednesday 01 June 2016 00:15:20 Felix Miata wrote: > Lisi Reisz composed on 2016-05-31 18:06 (UTC+0100): > > ...I have just kyboshed the computer I have attached > > to the television by trying Ubuntu MATE 16.04 as a dual boot. I am > > mentally working out the best

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 23:56:39 Stephen Powell wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 15:31, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > ... > > So I need static IPs fast! > > ... > > (The above was actually quoted from an earlier post). > If you want to convert your computers to use static

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 23:56:02 Richard Hector wrote: > On 01/06/16 07:31, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh in to run level > > one as root: > > > > lisi@Tux-II:~$ ssh root@192.168.0.5 > > ssh: connect to host 192.

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 21:51:30 Joe wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2016 20:31:32 +0100 > > Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > --- > > Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh in to run > > level one as

Re: ssh-ing in inside private network

On Thursday 31 March 2016 15:08:24 Brian wrote: > On Thu 31 Mar 2016 at 13:27:35 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Thursday 31 March 2016 12:28:57 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > 1. Each computer should have an SSH server running (on Debian that > > > would be package opens

Re: google-chrome-stable on Wheezy

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 19:11:37 Sven Hartge wrote: > Is your system 32bit by chance? Then there will be now recent Google > Chrome, as Google discontinued the support for 32bit architectures. You can't get 64 bit for Wheezy either. Lisi

Re: How to properly install Radeon drivers for Sid

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 17:44:48 Mostafa Shahverdy wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:50:14AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 11:42:51 Mostafa Shahverdy wrote: > > > > Why not try with older kernel that works with the driver? > > > > > >

Re: How to properly install Radeon drivers for Sid

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 11:42:51 Mostafa Shahverdy wrote: > > Why not try with older kernel that works with the driver? > > I always keep my OS up to date, that's why I use Sid, I always want the > latest updates :) Why?? Lisi

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Monday 30 May 2016 22:49:52 Lisi Reisz wrote: > (Parlez-vois français, je parle le   > français?) My spell checker can't cope with French, and I'm a lousy typist.. :-( parlez-vo*U*s français etc. Lisi

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Monday 30 May 2016 22:49:52 Lisi Reisz wrote: > "When I type "english" the spell-checker > tries to correct to to "English", why?" I'd have known immediately what you > meant. correction: "When I type "english" the spell-checker

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Monday 30 May 2016 20:35:40 Rodary Jacques wrote: > Thank you, I didn't know. In French (I was careful > here) languages' names and peoples' nationalities > don't take a capital letter. But towns' and countries' > names do of course. > Jacques > P.S.:I still don't see where was the joke

Re: Improper visuals after update

On Monday 30 May 2016 18:05:51 Bhasker C V wrote: > anyone ? I, for one, can't make any sense of the visual you supplied and the message, so I just gave up. Perhaps start again with explaining the problem? Lisi > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: > >

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Friday 27 May 2016 14:24:31 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 27 May 2016 14:16:50 Hársfalvi Gábor wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Is there any way to move the clock on the bar top on the screen? For > > example from center to left side. > > What desktop?? Or is it a wi

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Saturday 28 May 2016 10:11:39 Lisi Reisz wrote: > Thank you in > > > advance, and again, sorry for my poor english (kspell still tells me to > > write *English* instead and nobody told me why, and this proves nobody > > looks at the first post in a thread :-D) I thin

Re: WebRTC with Firefox in Debian Jessie

On Saturday 28 May 2016 10:08:56 Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-24, Juha Heinanen wrote: > > Markos writes: > >> I just found the WebRTC (https://webrtc.org/) project but I still don't > >> understand if I already can use it as an alternative to Skype. > > > > You need a web phone and

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Saturday 28 May 2016 01:28:03 Rodary Jacques wrote: > Thanks for your comments I also use apt* commands, when necessary, but > the point is that people don't seem to read thoroughly the threads they are > answering to: I don't mind using wicd, I even tried it. But it also uses >

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Friday 27 May 2016 14:24:31 Lisi Reisz wrote: > In TDE 3.5.13.2 on Wheezy, and TDE 14.0.4 on Jessie, you click just to the > left of the clock applet to bring up a small window which offers, among > other things, to move the clock.  You choose "move the clock" and move it

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Friday 27 May 2016 14:16:50 Hársfalvi Gábor wrote: > Hi! > > Is there any way to move the clock on the bar top on the screen? For > example from center to left side. What desktop?? Or is it a window manager? I seem to remember that you are running Gnome3 on Jessie, but you really need to

Re: [deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: Re: Network manager (again) Re:]

On Friday 27 May 2016 01:21:25 Rodary Jacques wrote: > > Could we have a reference please for "said unstable by debian's package > > installer"? (I assume you're talking about the wicd packages, because > > someone wrote "Please note, an entry does not work with network-manager. > > Use wicd

Re: What Mid-range USB Sound Cards Work with Linux?

On Wednesday 25 May 2016 02:07:30 Martin McCormick wrote: > the debian-user list as it is primarily for helping > folks install, adjust and operate good old Debian and ubuntu > Linux. No, it is NOT for Ubuntu. :-/ Lisi

Re: wireless without network-manager... is it still possible?

On Monday 23 May 2016 21:06:56 Joe wrote: > It used to be known as Notwork Manager, Or Network Mangler. ;-) Lisi

Re: wireless without network-manager... is it still possible?

On Monday 23 May 2016 20:13:38 Brian wrote: > On Tue 24 May 2016 at 01:17:44 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > > "Arseholes" is the correct terminology. You've not posted enough > > > nonsense in this thread yet for it to be

Re: What can AppArmor do?

On Monday 23 May 2016 14:13:34 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:11:27AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > But I am only using us-ascii, iso-8859-1, > > utf-8 (locale) and utf-8, with a locale of en_GB.UTF-8, so not > > very abstruse in view of

Re: wireless without network-manager... is it still possible?

On Sunday 22 May 2016 22:56:36 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 5/22/2016 3:23 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote: > >> [...] it merely indicates your incompetence. > > > > Folks, I'm out of this

Re: What can AppArmor do?

On Sunday 22 May 2016 07:43:43 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:17:22PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Saturday 21 May 2016 16:56:31 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > >

Re: What can AppArmor do?

On Saturday 21 May 2016 16:56:31 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 20 May 2016 15:57:27 Richard Owlett wrote: > > > That statement reminds me of one of George Orwell's characters > > > sayin

Re: Repository problem

On Saturday 21 May 2016 08:00:03 Hans wrote: > Dear debian-team, > > I suppose there is a problem with one of your repos. Probably just that mirror. Try a different mirror. Lisi > Please take a look: > > LANG=C aptitude update > . > .. > Hit ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stable

Re: Need Urgently solution or advice - start to give up on Debian

On Friday 20 May 2016 23:59:44 Brian wrote: > On Sat 21 May 2016 at 06:45:30 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > > On 21/05/2016, Brian wrote: > > > The OP is beginning to wish he had not mentioned Ubuntu. > > > > So, you are the original poster, and you do not want a solution to the

Re: Need Urgently solution or advice - start to give up on Debian

On Friday 20 May 2016 23:45:30 Bret Busby wrote: > So, you are the original poster, and you do not want a solution to the > problem? He wanted a solution to the problem of installing Debian. You did not offer one. > > Okay then. > > Either that, or you are simply a troll. The OP could have

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Friday 20 May 2016 18:08:37 Rodary Jacques wrote: > I read quite a lot of the answers to your post, and I still think there is > a problem, not linked to the kernel's interface name name. I have a wifi > interface named *everywhere* wlan0. It isn't found by network-pre.target, > network-target

Re: What can AppArmor do?

On Friday 20 May 2016 16:45:03 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 5/20/2016 10:08 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 20 May 2016 15:57:27 Richard Owlett wrote: > >> That statement reminds me of one of George Orwell's characters > >> saying "It means whatever I want it t

Re: What can AppArmor do?

On Friday 20 May 2016 15:57:27 Richard Owlett wrote: > That statement reminds me of one of George Orwell's characters > saying "It means whatever I want it to mean." No, Lewis Carol, Humpty Dumpty in Alice Through The Looking Glass. “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > cramps, took big B-12, should kick in shortly. Didn't know that one! (B12) Doesn't being old _suck_? Lisi

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2016 05:56:49 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > Yes, its the link in the sig. > > > > Which has been unreachable all morning from here.

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote: > Yes, its the link in the sig. Which has been unreachable all morning from here. :-( (Morning by BST=UTC+1) Lisi

Re: Grub won't install

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 19:57:00 Marc Shapiro wrote: > On 05/17/2016 09:13 PM, J Mo wrote: > > lilo is ultra-ancient. I don't even know if it works with modern kernels. > > Lilo definitely still works with current kernels. I started out using > lilo 17 or 18 years ago and I am still using it now

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 16:54:49 Gene Heskett wrote: > "auto lo eth0" auto lo and auto eth0 now?? Lisi It may not solve anything, but when rationality seems to fail one has to resort to magic, and just get the incantation right Lisi

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 16:14:36 Gene Heskett wrote: > auto lo eth0 eth1 > > Its there in the complete interfaces file I just posted, and you snipped. Gene - we have, I think, established that your set-up doesn't work the way predicted. The one thing that looks very different to me is the

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 14:42:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> [2016-05-18 12:31 +0100]: > > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > [...] > > > > /etc/init.d/networking stop does ifdown -a > > &

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Gilles Mocellin [2016-05-17 19:09 +0200]: > > Le 17/05/2016 à 14:34, Mimiko a écrit : > > > On 17.05.2016 15:16, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > > Ask your search engine: "init.d/networking restart is

Re: Something never understood: see USB storage in CLI & mc

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 12:14:00 Ron Leach wrote: > On 18/05/2016 10:40, Felix Miata wrote: > > Ron Leach composed on 2016-05-18 10:30 (UTC+0100): > >> I'd be grateful for any advice on where to find the physical device to > >> use in a mount command. > > > > # lsscsi > > ... > > [9:0:0:0] disk

Re: RANT: Virtual filesystems are getting out of control

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 07:52:03 Håkon Alstadheim wrote: > Den 18. mai 2016 06:51, skrev David Wright: > > $ mount -t ext3 ; mount -t ext4 > > Or, to get only real devices listed: mount | grep '^/' . > Frees you from knowing fstype. > > > $ man bash for info on aliases and shell functions. > >

Re: Need Urgently solution or advice - start to give up on Debian

On Tuesday 17 May 2016 23:01:35 YIM Programming Izhar Mashkif wrote: > Hello all. > > I have a problem with installing Debian as described at that discussion. > The problem is that my time is over I have a other computer that I must > install there OS or I will stay without Computer. > > I really

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Tuesday 17 May 2016 23:43:08 Gene Heskett wrote: [snip] If it ain't broke, hit it with a hammer? ;-) Lisi

Re: /etc/init.d/networking does not start everything in /etc/network/interfaces

On Tuesday 17 May 2016 15:38:52 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 09:56 -0400]: > > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [...] > > > > In my opinion, a warning is in order ("this might not be doing > > > what you think it does"),

Re: Opera Won't Run on Wheezy [SOLVED]

On Friday 13 May 2016 09:44:43 Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-13, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote: > >> Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome.  No biggie. > > > > Because Chrome is unsupported

Re: Opera Won't Run on Wheezy [SOLVED]

On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote: > Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome.  No biggie. Because Chrome is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit, pepper flash is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit. It makes no difference which of the browsers that you use that uses pepper

Re: Chromium. Good Alternative for Chrome?

On Thursday 12 May 2016 08:12:22 Curt wrote: > You should probably run 'check-support-status' to obtain a list of > packages on your machine that are no longer supported security-wise. lisi@Tux-II:~$ check-support-status check-support-status: command not found lisi@Tux-II:~$ aptitude show

Re: Portable Debian?

On Wednesday 11 May 2016 23:30:52 emetib wrote: > I know this is a little off topic, yet I wrote this a while back because of > script kiddies messing with ssh on my server at the time. > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1voXlQpos4uI0qhndcIunBew1mmQbwTPl07xG5JF >8bNM/edit?usp=drive_web It checks

Re: all at a sudden Firefox

On Tuesday 10 May 2016 20:16:30 John L. Ries wrote: > traditionally hanged on Guy Fawkes Day. No, traditionally burned on Guy Fawkes Day. Lisi

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 23:38:02 Liam O'Toole wrote: > Therefore openjdk-7-* is not regarded as an > upgrade (in the Debian packaging sense) over openjdk-6-*. Instead, they > are different packages, and both can be installed at the same time. Therein lies the rub - and the explanation. Thank you.

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 23:38:02 Liam O'Toole wrote: > The openjdk-6-* packages are now obsolete and unsupported > (both by Debian and upstream), and will receive no further security > updates. Yes, I have discovered that!!! Lisi

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 22:37:06 Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2016-05-09, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is also a pity that Wheezy LTS appears not to be a truly viable > > proposition for the desktop. > > True. The software versions are obviously quite

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 17:19:33 Brian wrote: > On Mon 09 May 2016 at 18:51:56 +0300, Piyavkin wrote: > > On 09.05.2016 17:18, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > >On Monday 09 May 2016 13:18:26 Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > >>what version of Windows could you purchase today that w

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 13:18:26 Dutch Ingraham wrote: > what version of Windows could you purchase today that would > operate on an Intel Pentium M 750? Windows 10 CLAIMS to run on 32 bit computers. I would have to pay £90.00 to test it, so I don't intend to do so. I haven't researched it much.

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 13:45:39 Stefan Monnier wrote: > > My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux. > > Why not? AFAIK my daughter's computer (running 32bit Debian stable) has > a working flash player (and yes, I'm talking about Adobe's crap plugin, > rather than gnash which sadly

Re: Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

On Monday 09 May 2016 10:22:57 Markus Schönhaber wrote: > Lisi Reisz, Mo 09 Mai 2016 10:38:54 CEST: > > I seem to have hit the following: > > My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux. If she insists > > on running Flashplayer, she can run an out of da

Flashplayer on 32 bit computers

I seem to have hit the following: My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux. If she insists on running Flashplayer, she can run an out of date Flashplayer in her current Debian system (if I can get a functional one installed) or she can go out, buy and install Windows. She will

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

On Monday 09 May 2016 02:01:28 Sven Hartge wrote: > Beware: this is David who has this CPU, not Lisi, wo has not yet > provided any further info in her CPU. I have not yet gained access to the computer again, which is not mine. I have confirmed (just now) that it is a Dell Inspiron 9300

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

On Sunday 08 May 2016 12:59:27 Sven Hartge wrote: > Unless the computer is more than 10 > years old, it should be able to run 64bit. It must be because it won't! It's certainly pretty old. I'll try again - I have to admit it is a while, but I am pretty sure I tried. None-the less, I'll try

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

On Saturday 07 May 2016 23:25:35 Sven Hartge wrote: > Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Granted - but my client won't be in a hurry to buy a new computer. > > And Google says: "We intend to continue supporting the 32-bit build > > configurations on Li

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

On Saturday 07 May 2016 22:41:39 Lisi Reisz wrote: > Granted - but my client won't be in a hurry to buy a new computer. And > Google says: "We intend to continue supporting the 32-bit build > configurations on Linux to support building Chromium." Chromium still > bei

Re: libpepflashplayer.so

On Saturday 07 May 2016 19:00:54 Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-07, Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote: > > Curt <cu...@free.fr> wrote: > >> On 2016-05-07, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Has anyone got the 32 bit file of libpepflash

libpepflashplayer.so

Has anyone got the 32 bit file of libpepflashplayer.so? If so, are you willing to send it to me? Please, if you do, could you tell me which version it is. Thank you. Lisi

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

On Friday 06 May 2016 16:39:33 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 12:41 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > The site in question says that it wants Flashplayer 11 but will not > > "speak" to  > > my Version: 11.2.202.577 on Firefox.   > > If I go to that si

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

On Friday 06 May 2016 17:46:52 Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-06, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > >> my Version: 11.2.202.577 on Firefox. > > > > If I go to that site without scripts, it claims to need at least > > version 13: > > Asks me for version 11 ("This content requires the Adobe Flash

Re: Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

On Friday 06 May 2016 13:08:34 Markus Schönhaber wrote: > Lisi Reisz, Fr 06 Mai 2016 13:41:50 CEST: > > I cannot get Pepperflashplugin installed on my clients computer.  I have > > aptitude installed it, but Chromium remains obstinately falshplayer free. > > You did >

Installing pepperflashplugin on Chromium on Wheezy which has not previously had Google-Chrome installed.

I know that Chromium with Pepperflashplugin can work on Wheezy because I have it working on my own desktop. A client who has never used or wanted Flash now wants to use this website: http://www.petersfieldphotographic.com/ to make a photo album. Her system had not been updated for a while.

Re: Sudo/root issues...

On Thursday 05 May 2016 20:51:45 Ralph Sanchez wrote: > Tried aptitude update and apt-get > commands, they needed root access so i did sudo on them Why not just run them as root?? Open terminal. $ su enter root password when asked. # aptitude update # aptitude safe-upgrade # aptitude

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >