Re: implicit lock in formail - FIXED

Il 8 gennaio 2001 (lunedì), alle 23:57, Defresne Sylvain ha scritto: > You need to remove the second colon from this line. It tells > procmail to use a lock and since you don't provide a name, it > try to determine the name of the lock from the name of the > mailbox and it

Re: problem with Zip 250

Il 8 gennaio 2001 (lunedì), alle 19:52, Christian Rüger ha scritto: > Hallo Tim > > > I have an internal Zip 250. When I try to mount it (e.g., mount -t vfat > > /dev/hdd /zip), the drive spins and then gives an error message about an > > mount -t vfat /dev/hdd4 /zip >

implicit lock in formail

Hi guys!!! Every time I run fetchmail->procmail->formail, I get this message in procmail.log: procmail: Couldn't determine implicit lockfile from "/usr/bin/formail" The only place where I use formail is in .procmailrc, where I put the lines: # cancels the header Received: :0fhw: | $FORMAIL -I Re

marks in syslog

Hi buddies! Why sometimes in my logs magically appears the line date,time host -- MARK -- What does this MARK mean? Thanks in advance, marco -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 G!/MU d-(--) s:- a-- C++@ UL>++ P>+ L++> E@ W+>++ N- o? K- w-- O--@ M->+ V- PS+ PE-@ Y PGP- t-- 5

Re: System security question

Il 5 gennaio 2001 (venerdì), alle 13:08, Nathan E Norman ha scritto: > have a printer then don't run lpd. If you have a printer but only > print locally, I think you can unbind the tcp port but I'd have to ^^^ what does it mean? how can I do this