On 9/21/12 3:06 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
If one cannot respond with civility and respect, one shouldn't
respond at all.
How would that help OSS?
I wasn't aware I had an obligation to help OSS in order to use it. The
list exists to help people use the software, and not primarily to help
the so
Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:00:33 -0700, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
>
>> On 6/29/12 6:56 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> Should my Debian system becomes cracked or infected by any kind of
>>> treat I would worry more about my usual files and not the settings for
>
On 6/29/12 6:56 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Should my Debian system becomes cracked or infected by any kind of
treat I would worry more about my usual files and not the settings for
Filezilla. I mean, nothing new here, security is a "multi-edged" sword.
Really? I'm far more concerned about my credent
On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:01 AM, lee wrote:
> Hm, I wonder why anyone is going to the lengths of replying to digest
> messages rather than just subscribing to the list ...
So they don't need to get hundreds of separate messages?! Most people don't
treat a digest as separate from a list, just an al
François Cerbelle wrote:
A list should *NEVER* alter the contents of a message and the
reply-to field *DOES BELONGS TO THE CONTENTS* of the message.
What happens if one of the subscribers does want to have a reply on a
specific address ? It is its right and the ListMaster do not have to
impo
Pantor wrote:
---Mutt: (no mailbox) [Msgs:0]---(date/date)-%>-(all)---
No mailbox is open.
Why it is?
Because you have it configured to look for mail in a different place
from where you have your MTA configured to put incoming mail.
Fix it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Kent West wrote:
Like he said, he's not complaining, or asking for help, or asking for
information; he's just saying that we have room for improvement.
Well, yes, but it remains to be seen whether everyone considers this
"room for improvement." A lot of projects and products spend a lot of
Michael Fothergill wrote:
I suspect the web doesn't say much about it other than Acrobat exists
and where you download it.
You might consider reading instead of "suspecting" -- that's not the case.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
And, obviously, if security is your only standard, my pet schnauzer is a
better browser than either of these. Functionality must come into play
as well.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
So, let me see if I understand this. The things for which Michelle,
Ron, Michael, Johannes, Judd, Florian and I were criticized, because
they were supposedly offensive, would be OK as long as they were in a
sig?
If they also honored the four-line sig netiquette, y
Ron Johnson wrote:
IOW, sure they could try to sell add space on the Linux desktop, but
who would buy it? Oracle? Veritas?
Um, Veritas IS Symantec.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michelle Konzack wrote:
2) The white asses of Jews which have very late adopted the judaeism
for arround a half century.
I was sympathetic to some of your arguments until this nonsense. A
little math indicates that you think there has been some huge upswing in
white conversion to Jud
Joe Potter wrote:
You want to see the context. You want to see the flow of the discussion
--- like we did years ago before you had to cave due to all the suites
who can do no better.
Sorry, but I'm not too slow to remember the substance of 95% of the
conversations I have with my co-workers.
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
However, given the that majority
of people invloved in the actual *discussion* are reading it a mail or
news reader, it is better to cater to that group. The fact these
discussion are archived on the web is really a side effect.
-
The majority of people involved i
Joe Potter wrote:
That, of course, is the main point you made. I put all this in the lap
of Bill Gates --- the miserable ass. He is never happy unless he is
destroying some standard and replacing it with crap of some kind.
Outlook does it this way not to be contrary, but for an obvious re
Paul Johnson wrote:
It's
preserved for posterity and not everybody wants to read a whole
thread to figure out what solved some random printing problem.
But, in fact, most people use web-based archives in which that's exactly
how they access the messages after the original discussion.
-
Alex Malinovich wrote:
Bottom-posting makes reading easier for those
who haven't followed an entire thread.
True. But that's the point: making it easier for those who *are*
following a thread ahould be the priority.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
17 matches
Mail list logo
