Hi Debian users,
My /var/log/daemon.log is now being flooded with
avahi-daemon: Received response with invalid source port 44038 on
interface 'eth1.0'
Could someone tell me what's going on? I'm using the testing
distribution of Debian.
Ryo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
[...]
> (I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
> experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
> in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Top posting may work. But I t
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Ryo Furue wrote:
[...]
> >But, since I formatted it as an ext2 filesystem,
> >it won't work with Windows any longer.
> >
> >So, I have a feeling that I did something wron
Stefan O'Rear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 03:14:19PM -0700, Ryo Furue wrote:
> > Argh. That sounds plausible. The page I consulted
> > (http://www.linux1394.org/faq.php#sbp2) didn't tell me th
Nicolas MASSE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Le samedi 28 Ao t 2004 08:51, Ryo Furue a crit :
[...]
> > I managed to add necessary modules to my kernel by consulting this
> > website
> >http://www.linux1394.org/start req.php
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:51:58PM -0700, Ryo Furue wrote:
[...]
> > I managed to add necessary modules to my kernel by consulting this
> > website
> >http://www.linux1394.org/sta
Hi all,
This may sound a stupid question, but how are we *supposed*
to use a firewire harddrive? I'm now using one without problems,
so this isn't a usual "howto" question.
The other day I asked our tech person for an internal ATA harddrive.
He didn't have one at the moment, so he gave me a fire
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hopefully this won't offend anyone; I'm just curious.
>
> I often see posts on this list with subject lines like:
>
> Doubt about Debian Installation
>
> or
>
> Configuring PS/2 Mouse Doubts
>
> Is this word "doub
Thank you all who responded! The problem was solved.
I said:
> After I upgraded the kernel from 2.4.18 SMP to 2.6.7 SMP,
> I lost the console bell (beep). I don't think I changed
> anything other than the kernel. Is it possible that the
> lack of the console bell is due to the kernel? If so,
>
Hi all,
After I upgraded the kernel from 2.4.18 SMP to 2.6.7 SMP,
I lost the console bell (beep). I don't think I changed
anything other than the kernel. Is it possible that the
lack of the console bell is due to the kernel? If so,
could someone tell me where to look?
I tried "xset b 100 400",
Hello all,
I'm wondering how to use remote fonts. I searched the
Google groups for information and browsed "man xfs",
but still don't know how to do that.
Here is my situation. I log in to a remote machine by
"ssh -X" from a local machine on which an X server
is running. Let's call the remote m
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>..
[. . .]
>I forgot to add that Stroustrap says that lot lot of memory
> management problems can be avoided by simply using variables on the
> stack and not dynamically allocate it using new (so you're not alone:-),
>
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
[. . .]
> > My point is that it's really is a choice. The fact is that in majority
> > of cases the heap is the better choise. But, I don't see any inherent
> > reason why you shouldn't use the stack for large data. I s
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Ryo Furue wrote:
[. . .]
> > That's a good question. In fact, most modern Unix/Linux systems allow
> > you to use as large stacksize as you like, roughly speaking. Although
> > th
Roel Schroeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
[...]
> > It's interesting that some of the new features are (or seem to me to be)
> > mainly for numerical computations, such as the "restrict" keyword and
> > the builtin complex numbers.
>
> Possibly, but isn't this
Roel Schroeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
[...]
> > Actually, the first version works -- and both C and C++ (tested here with
> > gcc -- not sure it it became a standard or not)) will dynamically allocate
> > memory for you. Try thi
Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > There's another problem with the above C++ code: If ny and nz
> > aren't constant, you can't write
> >
> > double s[ny][nz];
> >
> > Instead, either you allocate the array in two stages:
> >
> > dou
Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:54:12PM -0700, Ryo Furue wrote:
> > ... I haven't used the GNU Fortran 95, but I'm 98% sure that it's almost
> > unusable at this stage. Since
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
[. . .]
>it's [1]. debian has very slow release cycles, but unstable is much
> better quality than you'd expect from name. In general I see unstable
> being equal to latest releases of other distros (both features a
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Ryo Furue wrote:
[...]
> > That's out of question! :) For numerical computation, Fortran 95 is "better"
> > than C++. (I have plenty of experience in C++ programming.)
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Ryo Furue wrote:
[...]
> > In fact I looked at the homepage of nptl. That was kind of scary to me :)
> > The page says that you need to use a rather new kernel and libc.
[...]
>I don&#
"Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
[...]
I'm not sure whether I understand every point you make (I read your message
twice but there are still points I don't understand), but I think I understand
your main point: A binary distribution may not work o
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Ryo Furue wrote:
> > Some open source software like GNU emacs runs on most Unixes.
> > I bet a LOT of resources went into it.
>
> Some? Some!? slrn, apache, mysql, screen, joe
Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:
[...]
> > I'm using the Intel Fortran Compiler (IFC). Its version 7 runs on Debian
> > without any problem whatsoever, although Intel doesn't support Debian. But,
> > last year Intel released a total rewrite of the compiler, version 8, with
Hi,
Since Kent West has kindly clarified what I wanted to say, I'm not going to
repeat my main point. Only the following:
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
[...]
>about particular software (nptl thread library) not being available
> for woody: why
Paul,
Thanks for your comments.
| > I'm using the Intel Fortran Compiler (IFC). Its version 7 runs on
| > Debian without any problem whatsoever, although Intel doesn't support
| > Debian. But, last year Intel released a total rewrite of the
| > compiler, version 8, with which my Fortran program
Hello all,
I recently found the following:
$ df -k
[...]
/tmp/autol8wP90 37483560 2742148 32837312 8% /tmp/autoKVio9R
$
which I'd never seen before. I'm the sole user and the admin of the machine.
Also,
$ ls -lF /tmp
total 28
drwx--0 root root0 Jul
"Steven Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Working in a MS, Solaris, Linux, Tru64 shop, I find that for the vast
> majority of our servers the usability of Linux is as good as Unix if not
> better. While Unix might have high end bits Linux lacks for 95% of t
John L Fjellstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I was wondering if Linux can be considered Unix?
This question makes me laugh (no offense to you) because it reminds me (and
would remind many people who frequent(ed) comp.unix.admin) of a certain person,
who would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ryo Furue) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
[...]
> When invoked with the --syslog option, fetchmail uses syslog:
>
>[...] Messages are logged
>with an id of fetchmail, the facility LOG_MAIL, and prior-
>ities L
Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
[. . .]
> In the FM page I did a search on log. Maybe this is what you want.
[. . . ]
> The -L or --logfile option (keyword: set logfile)
> allows you to redirect status messages [. . .]
Thank you, Wayne! But, in fa
Hello all,
I'm wondering if someone could help me with how to keep fetchmail
from logging to /var/syslog. I read the manpages of both fetchmail
and syslog, but still don't understand.
When invoked with the --syslog option, fetchmail uses syslog:
[...] Messages are logged
with a
32 matches
Mail list logo
