pgrade. I
haven't seen anyone else mentioning this as a problem, so I am at a bit of a
loss as to its cause. Any ideas?
I'm using a GUS Extreme and the (commercial) OSS drivers.
--
Stig Are M. Botterli | Some men see things as they are and ask why.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Others dream things
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 07:21:48PM +0100, Phillip Deackes wrote:
>"Stig Are M. Botterli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> After upgrading to the latest Realplayer (via
>> realplayer_7.0.2.1_i386.deb),
>> I am now told "Cannot open the audio device. Anot
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 05:13:04PM -0500, Brad wrote:
>On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 09:19:27PM +0200, Stig Are M. Botterli wrote:
>>
>> xmms works fine. However, I've found one peculiar way of playing. If I go
>> to preferences and choose "Esound support", go ou
a look at http://www.PLiG.org/xwinman/
>Brian
Stig Are M. Botterli |"Always let people think you're dumber then
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| you really are, they'll underestimate you.
| Then you can obliterate them." -Greg Graffin
anced ET6000 support. You don't need anything else from the
3.2A distribution. Atleast I didn't.
>Lawrence,
Stig Are M. Botterli | "Always let people think you're dumber than
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| you really are, they'll underestimate you.
| Then
a board.
The reason I am considering this system is that I am also very attracted to the
BeOS and the fact that it will most probably run a CHRP version of Rhapsody.
For a Linux-only system it makes sense to stick to x86, esp. considering the
competition Intel is seeing from Cyrix and AMD.
Stig
gt;> confusing it with the Keenya, which is a Mac clone based on Motorola's
>> Tanzania board.
>
>is it an at or atx format board then? I don't recall seeing anything to
>that effect (but would be very happy if it were atx).
ATX. You will find the technical spcifications
27;t really all that important, as
most cards seem to be supported by the commercial, but fairly
inexpensive, OSS/Linux.
Stig Are M. Botterli | "Always let people think you're dumber than
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| you really are, they'll underestimate you.
| T
re fully supported in OSS lite. Not sure though.
Stig Are M. Botterli | "Always let people think you're dumber than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | you really are, they'll underestimate you.
| Then you can obliterate them." -Greg Graffin
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE F
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Moseley
wrote:
>
> $ dpkg -l | grep font
>
> ii gsfonts-x110.16 Make Ghostscript fonts available to X11.
This package is a real uglificator. Replace it with a dummy equiv.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Moseley
wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Stig Are M. Botterli wrote:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Moseley
>wrote:
>> >
>> > $ dpkg -l | grep font
>> >
>> > ii gsfonts-x110.16
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Z Maze wrote:
> "Stig Are M. Botterli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Moseley
>wrote:
>>>
>>> ii gsfonts-x110.16 Make Ghostscript fonts availa
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Montagne wrote:
>
> Relatedly I also get this when trying to start ROX, which started this
> whole experience:
>
> (rox:8892): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Can not open pixbuf loader module
> file
> '/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders': No such file or directory
>
In article <avpqko$qr7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stig Are M. Botterli wrote:
>
> I have exactly the same problem with both ROX and Synaptic. How is the
> '/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders' supposed to be generated?
Ok, installing unstable/libgtk2.0-common, which includes
&#
Basically, if my /boot/vmlinuz image exceeds a certain size (the limit seems be
somewhere around 90 bytes), the following occurs on boot:
hdc6: bad access: block=2, count=2
end_request: I/O error, dev 16:06 (hdc), sector 2
EXT3-fs: Unable to read superblock
hdc6: bad access: block=2, count=2
e
In article <20021205080347.GE7442@ursine>, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:04:34AM +0000, Stig Are M. Botterli wrote:
>> Basically, if my /boot/vmlinuz image exceeds a certain size (the limit se=
>> ems be
>> somewhere around 90 bytes)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Klaus Imgrund wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:16:29 +
>>
> I had kernels bigger than 1 MB - no problem.
> It would help if you remember what things you configured as modules.
Unfortunately, I don't.
> If you got i.e a driver for the wrong sound card compiled i
In article <20021206045426.GA22017@ursine>, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Wait, are you trying to boot a kernel that doesn't have ext3 compiled
> in on a system whose /etc/fstab specifies the / partition as being
> ext3?
Nope, ext2/ext3 have been included in the vmlinuz-image all along.
I'll throw in
I wanted to remove a dependency from a debian package. I took it apart and
edited the control-file, and put it back together. However, dpkg wouldn't
recognize it as a debian package. 'file' reports it as a "current ar
archive", while it reports the original .deb as a Debian binary package. So
the q
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>
> When thinking about this, I wonder: Is there a way to easily specify and add
> versions later than in stable for only specific packages? In other words, is
> there some way I can do an apt-get and specify Perl 5.8 (assuming it's
> already
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Florian Struck wrote:
>
> make menuconfig
> make dep
> make modules
> make-kpkg kernel_image
> and dpkg -i "resulting-kernel.deb"
Step two and three are both taken care of in step four. I also wouldn't
leave out 'make-kpkg clean' before your fourth step. I had some
21 matches
Mail list logo
