on Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 08:53:44PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Dear Linux-users,
>I have a suggestion , which I guess all of us should be taking
> seriously
>
> Why don't we have a 'centralised' Nameserver , that
> will do the IP-to-name-resolution for th
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 08:53:44PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why don't we have a 'centralised' Nameserver , that
> will do the IP-to-name-resolution for the browsers
> of all the Linux users .
This is a very foolish idea. Name service should be organied by network
topology, not operatin
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.05 20:53:44+0530]:
> Why don't we have a 'centralised' Nameserver , that
> will do the IP-to-name-resolution for the browsers
> of all the Linux users .
would you provide that nameserver, which can handle the load as well
as the bandwidth volume?
Dear Linux-users,
I have a suggestion , which I guess all of us should be taking seriously
Why don't we have a 'centralised' Nameserver , that
will do the IP-to-name-resolution for the browsers
of all the Linux users .
Our /etc/resolv.conf files can then mention the IP Address
of
4 matches
Mail list logo
