On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:54:03PM +, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:46:41PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> > # aptitude install bleh
>
> Yeah, i figured that but then i thought why not apt-get!!
Aptitude is smarter in same ways, for a start, but the bigger reason is
that aptit
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:46:41PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> # aptitude install bleh
Yeah, i figured that but then i thought why not apt-get!!
Would still be good to be able to sync the aptitude package status with
the actual package status, is this possible?
hugh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:46:28PM +, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:20:25PM +, iain d broadfoot wrote:
> > - Forwarded message from Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> > Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:57:15 +
> > From: Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
* Hugh Saunders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> not avoiding woodyr1 but i dont have fast connection [56k dialup] so i
> want to aptiutude to install what i select and its dependencies [nothing
> else- bit like apt-get install -which is what i end up using!] but as
> ive fiddled about with it, aptitud
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:20:25PM +, iain d broadfoot wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:57:15 +
> From: Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: iain d broadfoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
> X-Spa
- Forwarded message from Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:57:15 +
From: Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: iain d broadfoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SpamProbe:
Subject: Re: Quick aptitude question...
X-CIS-MailScanner: Found to be
6 matches
Mail list logo
